No EU law or regulation bans this. Another maga level bullshit.

People sleeping in cheap hostels are complaining about AC in a country with very comfortable breezy weather.

Elon Musk is the Ivar Kreuger of our time, and the OpenAI trial is PROVING it in real time. If you don't know who Kreuger was, you should: In the 1920s he was the most admired businessman in the world. The "Match King." He controlled 90% of global match production, lent money to sovereign governments, and his securities were the most widely held in America. But after his death in 1932, auditors spent 5 years untangling over 400 subsidiary companies and discovered the whole thing was held together with fictitious assets, forged bonds, and the unquestioning loyalty of people too dazzled to ask questions. Investors lost $750 million (~$17 billion in today's money). His deficits exceeded Sweden's national debt. Doesn't this sound familiar? The Musk playbook is the most DANGEROUS house of cards I've witnessed in my career. This week in federal court, Musk took the stand to argue that Sam Altman stole a charity. 3 days later he'd contradicted himself under oath so many times that the judge told his lawyers she suspected plenty of people don't want to put the future of humanity in Mr. Musk's hands. OpenAI's attorney asked if Tesla is pursuing AGI. Musk said no. The attorney then pulled up Musk's OWN post from March 4 where he wrote Tesla will be one of the companies to make AGI. His own words entered into evidence against him. BY HIM. Then the attorney asked if xAI used OpenAI's models to train Grok (which violates OpenAI's terms of service). Musk called it a general practice among AI companies. Pressed for a direct answer, he said "partly." Think about that: Musk is in court accusing OpenAI of betrayal while admitting under oath that xAI violated the very same company's terms of service to build Grok. Then came the credibility test: Musk was asked to name his companies that benefit society. He listed Tesla, SpaceX, Neuralink, and X without hesitation. Every one of them is an uncapped for-profit enterprise. Then why did xAI start as a benefit corporation and quietly flip to a for-profit C-corp? No clean answer. This is someone who repeatedly launches entities with noble-sounding charters and converts them into for-profit corporations once the money gets serious. Then his money manager Jared Birchall took the stand: OpenAI's lawyer asked about the donor-advised funds at Vanguard and Fidelity that Musk used to send his $38 million. Did Musk have any legal right to direct where the money went once it entered the DAF? Birchall couldn't answer. Said the legal question was beyond his expertise. The entire lawsuit hinges on that donation creating enforceable obligations. But the man who managed Musk's money just told a federal jury he can't confirm Musk had any enforceable claim over those funds. Now step back... This is a man who promised full autonomy by 2018, a million robotaxis by 2020, and unsupervised FSD by June 2025. EVERY deadline was missed. He claimed he invested $100 million in OpenAI. The real number was $38 million. His defense? His "reputation" made up the difference. Kreuger had 400 subsidiaries and used one entity to prop up another through structures nobody could follow. Musk has Tesla, SpaceX, xAI, Neuralink, the Boring Company, and X. He shifts AI talent from Tesla to xAI, has xAI building the brains for Tesla's Optimus robot, and uses X as a megaphone while the algorithm amplifies his narrative to 200 million followers. Kreuger's investors trusted the man, NOT the math. They loved the confidence. They stopped asking questions because the aura of genius made questioning feel foolish. The same psychology applies to Musk's empire today. Kreuger's reckoning took 5 years of forensic auditing after his death. But Musk is providing his in REAL TIME: contradicting his own posts under oath, admitting to the practices he's suing others for, watching his logic collapse under cross-examination. Different decade. Different industry. Same ending. The truth always catches up.

When we remind people that Musk is a known fraud, it's not because we're making shit up. This is typical of everything he does.

100,000 American troops in Europe = a free ride for Europeans? Let's check the facts. 🔹 American military bases are not free Germany, Italy, Spain, and Romania pay for the infrastructure, land, utilities, and civilian personnel of US bases. Germany alone contributes over $1 billion annually to support the American military presence on its soil. 🔹 Europe is the largest customer of the American defense industry F-35s, Patriot missiles, HIMARS, Apaches — all purchased by Europeans with real money. Every security alarm in Europe translates into contracts for Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, and Boeing. 🔹 American bases in Europe don't only protect Europe Ramstein in Germany coordinates operations across Africa and the Middle East. Sigonella in Italy covers the Mediterranean and North Africa. Romania secures the eastern flank and the Black Sea. These are global American strategic assets — not neighborhood security for Europeans. 🔹 Command is American, not European NATO is always led by an American Supreme Commander (SACEUR). Europe contributes troops, bases, and money — but America holds the controls. Those who control the structure are not the ones getting a free ride. 🔹 The nuclear umbrella is not altruism American nuclear deterrence in Europe keeps the dollar as the world's reserve currency, keeps European markets open to US corporations, and legitimizes American hegemony against Russia and China. But what would actually happen if America withdrew its troops from Europe? 🔹 For America — immediate strategic losses Without bases in Europe, American response time to any crisis in Europe, Africa, or the Middle East grows from hours to days. Ramstein, Sigonella, and Incirlik cannot be replaced by aircraft carriers. Infrastructure built over decades disappears overnight. 🔹 The American defense industry loses its biggest customer A Europe without the US umbrella will build its own defense industry — and fast. Airbus Military, KNDS, Leonardo, and Rheinmetall will take the contracts that Lockheed and Raytheon currently win. Billions of dollars shift from America to Europe. 🔹 The dollar weakens Dollar hegemony is partly sustained by American global military credibility. A withdrawal from Europe signals to the world that America no longer guarantees the postwar order. Alternatives — the euro, the yuan — become more attractive as global reserve options. 🔹 Russia wins without firing a single shot Not necessarily through immediate invasion — but through political influence, energy pressure, and the gradual destabilization of countries on the eastern frontier. The Baltic states, Poland, and Romania enter a security grey zone that no one can guarantee quickly. 🔹 China watches and draws conclusions about Taiwan A precedent of withdrawal from Europe sends a direct signal to Beijing: American commitments are negotiable. The cost of deterrence in the Pacific rises exponentially. Withdrawal is not isolationism. It is strategic abdication. America would not be leaving Europe because it no longer has interests there. It would be leaving while ignoring that those very interests are what make it a superpower. The "free ride" narrative doesn't describe Europe. It describes exactly what America has in Europe.

In Jan 2025, he said Elon Musk was going the balance the budget with DOGE finding fraud. On 2/2/25 he said tariffs would balance the budget. On 6/2 he said OBBB would balance the budget. On 6/12 he said Trump Cards would balance the budget. Now he says Vance will do it.

It is being presented as retail inclusion, but that is only the surface-level narrative. A more accurate reading is that this is about control—who has it, and who does not. If Elon Musk allocates a significant portion of a SpaceX IPO to retail investors, he is not simply “opening the doors to the public.” He is, more importantly, closing the doors to institutional dominance. Traditional IPO structures concentrate power in the hands of a relatively small group of large funds. Those institutions do not just invest—they influence pricing, governance, and narrative. Reducing their allocation reduces their leverage. At the same time, replacing institutions with retail is not a neutral swap. Retail investors do not behave like institutions. They are not valuation-driven in the same disciplined way; they are narrative-driven, sentiment-driven, and—critically in Musk’s case—personality-driven. This is where the strategy becomes clear. Musk has already demonstrated, most notably with Tesla, Inc., that a highly engaged and loyal following can sustain valuations that traditional metrics struggle to justify. His “army” of followers does not operate like conventional capital—they buy into vision, identity, and belief as much as they do into financials. That creates a powerful feedback loop: attention drives demand, demand drives price, and rising price reinforces the narrative. A retail-heavy IPO structure effectively weaponises that dynamic from day one. Instead of institutions capturing the early upside and imposing discipline, the initial float is placed into the hands of participants who are more likely to: • Hold through volatility • Add on momentum • Promote the story publicly • Treat the investment as alignment with Musk himself The result is not just participation—it is price amplification. So while the framing will be about fairness and access, the underlying mechanism is more strategic. It shifts pricing power away from cautious, valuation-focused institutions and toward a distributed base that is far more responsive to narrative and momentum. In that sense, this is less about democratising finance and more about re-engineering the IPO process to favour a different kind of market force—one that Musk already knows how to mobilise. RAM

Tesla is still valued 10x more than their current car business, so you see - market still believes in Elon's BS promises

Typical manipulation by showing 2 days movement (totally not material). If he showed 1 year, the chart would be so much different🤡

6:49am: sudden spike in oil futures trading. no news. no announcement. nothing public. 7:05am: trump announces a pause on iran strikes. markets move. someone knew. 16 minutes early. $580 million in contracts. the corruption is staggering.

Not that easy. He does one thing today and completely opposite thing tomorrow. His actions are just as chaotic as his talks.

Is this new maga narrative justifying half baked war with Iran?

we are witnessing realtime meltdown of Musk’s Ai ambitions. XAi total bust, Tesla robotics team completely gone, this 10 years old FSD project is nowhere close to new gen Autonomy tech and robotaxi hit the wall. SpaceX to save it all? we ll see.. $tsla

Můj úvodník do zítřejšího Neviditelného psa: Před čtyřmi lety přepadl Vladimír Putin už zcela otevřeně sousední zemi. Od roku 2014 ji zužoval za bezmocného přihlížení svobodného světa, ale až 24. února 2022 se odhodlal k otevřené agresi v naději, že se vše odbude za tři dny. Dopadlo to jinak a v tento výroční den ke všemu bude jistě vysloveno a napsáno mnoho slov. Proto svoje téma velmi zúžím. Tomáš Jirsa a Michal Půr pozvali do svého podcastu Insider bývalého prezidenta Václava Klause. Názory Václava Klause jsou dobře známé. Říká totéž co Putinův mluvčí Peskov: válku zavinil Západ tím, že ohrožoval svou rozpínavostí Rusko a jemu nezbylo než se bránit. Kdyby nebylo zásahu Borise Johnsona, mír mohl být uzavřen už v roce 2022. Rusko nemá žádné územní nároky, jen zajišťuje svoji bezpečnost, to je v jádře sdělení Václava Klause (Dmitrije Peskova). Na tomto opulentním velerozhovoru je pozoruhodná pouze novinářská nemohoucnost obou pánů novinářů. Fascinující byla jejich neochota Klausovi jakkoli čelit. Tento díl Insideru se v míře servility nelišil od produkcí Xavera Veselého, který si Klause zve do své Wilsonovy 10 pravidelně. Bez námitky akceptovali nehoráznost o absenci územních nároků: vždyť všechno začalo záborem Krymu, následovalo „ústavní včlenění‟ ukrajinských oblastí do těla Ruské federace. V současnosti jednání troskotá na ruském požadavku spolknout zbytek Donbasu, který není schopno vojensky dobýt. Čili ruská „územní zdrženlivost‟ je nehorázný nesmysl. To ale není jádro mého sdělení. Klausovy názory známe, on je exponent zájmů Ruska v České republice a zašel v tomto ohledu mnohem dál, než dělal kdy Miloš Zeman. V poslední době se ale v Klausově ideovém arzenálu objevil nový prvek. Rusko je zjevně znepokojené obratem v německé politice a snaží se sabotovat snahy této pořád ještě nejsilnější evropské mocnosti postavit rozvrácenou obranu na nohy. Má k tomu uvnitř Německa mnoho spojenců, zejména tradiční přisluhovače ze sociální demokracie. Ale Rusko hraje i na mezinárodní scéně. Také Václav Klaus poslouží na složité šachovnici ruské hry. Hodně ho uslyšíme v souvislosti s chystaným sjezdem sudeťáků v Brně. Ale to bude jen dílčí jitření nálad obyvatelstva. Jde o vyšší hru. Jasně to zaznělo v propagandistickém vystoupení, zprostředkovaném pány Jirsou a Půrem v Insideru: nesmyslné zbrojení, zbůhdarma utopené peníze… Klaus pečlivě odříkával kremelské noty. Jsem pamětník doby, kdy Německo vstupovalo do NATO. Takzvaný „německý revanšismus‟ byl trvalá součást komunistické (=ruské) propagandy po celou dobu trvání režimu. Teď to nastane znovu. Klaus je dirigent a zvedl taktovku. Co bude dál? Nastane ta správná „zkouška státníkova‟, jak se zachová Andrej Babiš a co bude podnikat ministr zahraničí Petr Macinka. Rusko rozumí jen síle a nechce, aby Německo bylo silné, aby Evropa byla silná. Tak jednoduché to je. Václav Klaus zjevně dělá všechno pro to, aby pomohl snahy o obnovu branné síly hatit. Není v tom sám. Bude to kolektivní úsilí, v tomhle jsou Rusové mistry, kromě vraždění je pleticha něco, v čem vynikají.

$TSLA in Europe seems to be going through the arc of First to Last to Zero.

I want to thank everyone for all the support we’re receiving. There really is an incredible amount of it. For me, the sacrifice of the people depicted on the helmet means more than any medal ever could - because they gave the most precious thing they had. And simple respect toward them is exactly what I want to give.

Tesla was always “we’ll make money in the future”. They never did, and the competition has now overtaken Tesla. Still its value is the same as the rest of the automakers combined. Bcs Elon rebranded Tesla as a robot-maker. This is his trick, selling stories of owning the future.

Mate na mysli Iana Milese Cheonga ktery je jednim z nejvetsich misinformation spreaderu na X?

president trump a week ago: china deal what pm carney “should be doing and it’s a good thing for him to sign a trade deal." president trump today:

For anyone who would like to hear Mark Carney’s outstanding Davos speech in full here it is. This is what true global leadership looks like. Canada should be immensely proud today, because they are leading the fight back when others dare not. 🎥 TikTok - vm.tiktok.com/ZNRBDT4mB/