Davos doesn't have the answers. It has caused the problems

His eyes are a dead zone....a clue

It's not up to him he's clearly taking orders from Blackrock etc.

Like a lot of other people i'd always believed that Putin was a bad guy. When all this Ukraine/Russia shit started i did my own research & it didnt take me long to find out the truth. Putin is not the bad guy. I dont expect anyone to take me word, just dont believe what the media tells you. Research what the people in Donbass went through for years before Putin went into Ukraine. Watch Ukraine on Fire by Oliver Stone 🙏

Yet again they called is conspiracy theorists for telling you that Starmer works for WEF SCUM like Blackrock. Who remember are massively invested in Ukraine so he'll even send your kids to die to protect that. He started his war on farmers after his meet with Gates too.

The Ukrainian military can’t beat the Russians. The American military couldn’t even beat the Taliban. Talks are the only solution. How many more must die and how much more money wasted before the inevitable negotiations begin?

𝐓𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐞 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐡𝐚𝐯𝐞 𝐢𝐭 He’s a traitor. He works for them, not us… He’s serving the globalists and the investment companies not the British people! 𝐇𝐞 𝐡𝐚𝐬 𝐒𝐎𝐋𝐃 𝐔𝐒 𝐎𝐔𝐓

Let me make this simple. Zelensky cannot “win” but the world can lose. Biden and Starmer should stand down now, with Trump taking over in America and a General Election in UK, which would doubtless be all about war and peace

If the Government were to try a draft, would you let your kids go and fight in Ukraine ?

Prime Minister Kier Starmer’s senseless decision to let Zelensky attack Russia with UK missiles is a futile, costly escalation into unknown danger: all without Britain’s consent. This action indelibly stains Starmer & Labour as reckless militarists

And that was in place under the uniparty Tories

We’re all supposed to believe this guy decided to push us closer to WW3 all on his own. x.com/John73111870/status/18…

I'M SO COLD........ I ask you @Keir_Starmer how do you think that makes me feel hearing my 90 year old neighbour saying that? She came to her front door with a blanket wrapped around her. I MADE her put the heating on - whether she leaves it on I have no idea. This is what YOU have done to our elderly. The illegals in hotels have no such worry do they! WHERE ARE THE HUMAN RIGHTS FOR OUR OWN??

🇺🇸JEFFREY SACHS: "It's very important to understand that World War II never ended with a treaty, and I think the United States was to blame. The reason it never ended with a treaty is that the Soviet Union said, 'Germany killed 27 million of our people; we want Germany to be disarmed and neutral.' Of course, Germany itself was divided into occupation zones at the end of the war in 1945. The U.S. immediately came to the view, in the summer of 1945, that the next war would be with the Soviet Union. Rather than making a peace agreement to end World War II, the U.S., along with the British and French occupation zones, merged, formed the Federal Republic of Germany, and rearmed Germany. By the way, the fact is that they put a lot of former Nazis back in charge of leading armaments industries, and a few years later, Germany joined NATO. This was, of course, both an affront and a threat for the Soviet Union. NATO was never viewed as a defensive force. The Soviet Union saw NATO as the next front in a continuing Western war against it. There were periods of détente, for example with Nixon, and periods of tension, but there was never an end to World War II on the basis of a treaty. When Mikhail Gorbachev said, 'I wanted to end the Cold War'—and be sure, he ended the Cold War—he ended it peacefully. This needs to be remembered: it wasn't an American victory. Mikhail Gorbachev said, 'I wanted the walls to come down.' Of course, Reagan wanted to do that peacefully together with Gorbachev, but it was Gorbachev's initiative. I watched a lot of it firsthand, up close, in Central and Eastern Europe, as an economic advisor to the heads of governments involved in this. Immediately, the question of German reunification arose. In that context, there needed to be an agreement between the West and the Soviet Union for the legal end of the occupation of Germany. German reunification was a legal event that was essentially the end of World War II—you needed the Soviet assent. What did the United States and Germany say to the Soviet Union to get that assent? It was not ambiguous; it was not unclear. They said, without any equivocation, 'We will have German reunification, and NATO will not move one inch eastward.' Those were the words used by U.S. Secretary of State James Baker III directly to Mikhail Gorbachev on February 9, 1990. Hans-Dietrich Genscher—on a tape you can listen to—said, 'When we say it won't move, we don't just mean within Germany; we mean anywhere to the east.' It's so clear. Of course, America cheats. Please understand this: America is a big power. It cheats. It tries to do what it can. It uses media and propaganda to get away with cheating—that's what big powers do, have no question. A few years later, the United States claimed, 'Oh, we never promised that.' You can just read it in the documentation, which is available online in the National Security Archive of George Washington University. So, in 1994, under Bill Clinton, the U.S. cheated. They adopted a plan: NATO would expand eastward. And, by the way, not just eastward by 100 km or 300 km, but keep going east—all the way to Ukraine, all the way to Georgia, remember. They wanted to go even beyond. I'm sure some crazy person in the United States said, 'Why not Kazakhstan? Why not Uzbekistan? Why not Armenia?' Their idea in 1990—I know it—was, 'We won!' Especially in December 1991, when the Soviet Union ended, the American 'strategists'—if you can call them that; it's a kind of euphemism because they are hardly good at strategy—said, 'We're alone. We're the most powerful country in the history of the world. We're more powerful than the Roman Empire. We're the world's sole superpower. We can do whatever we want.' So that was the mindset, and cheating goes along with that mindset—the arrogance of power. So, to make a long story short: yes, the United States started to expand. Zbigniew Brzezinski, one of these strategists, explained very clearly in 1997, in his book The Grand Chessboard, why Russia would be unable to resist. In a meticulously laid-out chapter, he asked the question: What if the U.S. pushes NATO? What if Europe keeps expanding eastward, crowds Russia, surrounds Russia—what can Russia do? Brzezinski asked whether Russia could resist or if it would have to give in, and he concluded that Russia would have no choice. He reached the conclusion, for example, that Russia would never form an alliance with China. He also concluded that Russia would never form an alliance with Iran. You know, okay, theorists—this is playing games. He compared the world to a chessboard. By the way, the world is not a chessboard; it's not a poker game. It's the real lives of eight billion people. American strategists are trained in game theory, which, by itself, in its name, gives everything away. They treat the world as a game—bluff, raise, call—as if it's a poker match. And you know what? They used other people's lives to do it. They raised the stakes with Putin: 'We raise you.' But whose lives were they betting on the table? The Ukrainian lives. Huh, not a good show."

It's so convincing, from a government that sprays billions in its sinister and sadistic determination to immiserate and control the people, funnelling more billions into a for-profit war in Ukraine, that it's the farmers' fault the NHS doesn't have enough money.

My God, he's not just dangerously stupid, he's insane.

Bookmark this. Keep this. Remember this. Watch it often. Memorize it. Learn it. Understand it. Grasp it. Believe it. And never forget it. Ever.

What would happen if Russia fired a couple of missiles on London? This is insane. Britain has no role in this war. The 25th amendment should be invoked, Biden removed and Trump take control of US foreign policy from today. World war 3? Seriously? apple.news/AtURsNVZyThWj2E0x…

Has anyone calculated how the impact of multiple nuclear bombs affects climate change?

So many fake jobs

Dear World, This is the UK Prime Minister opening the G20 Summit He talks about ending hunger whilst at the precisely the same time tens of thousands of Farmers descended on London to protest the fact this man is making them all bankrupt. The people that grow us food - think about it. . Climate Change is also obviously one massive scam too.