We are really happy to announce $NDMEME is now bridgeable between NeoX and N3 🌉🥳 Bonus: There is an arbitrage opportunity between our Carrot Swap and Flamingo pools for the first users wanting to test It 💚

I was told that "they" disabled liquidations on the Flamingo. How could they do that if that's exactly what makes the protocol work? Was it all a scam? FLM was developed and maintained by @ngd_neo. How was this allowed? What if users try to withdraw their FUSD?

For the record, you’re full of shit

This is one of the major reasons I left N3 behind me. The effort put into not publishing the non-neo addresses is suspicious to me. What is @dahongfei hiding? And why is @erikzhang attacked for fighting for it? Best to put this drama behind me.

Tomorrow, I am going to be talking about the $NEO drama between the two co-founders Don't forget to tune into the Space Anyone and everyone is welcome to join and talk about what happened x.com/i/spaces/1YqGolReLLzJv

Professor Dashboard was in a good mood today and made a new buyback and burnt 71.5K $NDMEME 🥳 Chart is looking nice 💚

Be aware everyone! 👀

Hey! @Neo_Blockchain @dahongfei @erikzhang Can someone confirm if @Lin_Pengfei_Neo is a scammer or have been hired by you? 👀

Day 1 of tweeting $NEO until @lllwvlvwlll buys some $NDMEME

Day 18 of tweeting $NEO until @erikzhang buys some $NDMEME

Day 17 of tweeting $NEO until @erikzhang buys some $NDMEME

I want to point out some inconsistencies in this post. 1. Claim of “supermajority control of the treasury.” The assertion that Erik controls a “supermajority” of the treasury and consensus nodes is inconsistent with publicly verifiable on-chain data. The addresses attributed to Erik currently hold approximately 6.7 million NEO and 3 million GAS. This figure is significantly lower than the 25 million NEO that Da Hongfei previously stated were held by the Neo Foundation earlier last year. If the Foundation indeed controlled 25 million NEO as recently as that time, it is difficult to reconcile how the amount currently attributed to Erik could reasonably be described as a “supermajority” of the treasury. 2. Claim that Erik dictates consensus node voting There is no evidence that Erik unilaterally dictates which consensus nodes are elected. On the contrary, available data suggest that his voting power is being used to support NGD-operated nodes, which are controlled by DHF, even if indirectly. As shown in the referenced screenshot, there are five addresses with sufficient NEO to materially influence consensus voting (which requires roughly 800,000 NEO). Of these five addresses: - Three are voting for NGD-operated nodes - Two are not voting at all Currently, voting power is used to elect NGD-controlled nodes, such as NGD4, NGD6, and NGD8. Community-run candidates are receiving on the order of ~100,000 votes each, which is insufficient for election on their own. In other words, while Erik may have execution control over certain votes, those votes are being used to favor NGD, not to hijack governance for personal control. 3. The “NF and I” statement and alleged resource constraints The following passage is particularly confusing: “NF and I remain committed to Neo’s long-term development and governance. Given the current resource constraints…” Who exactly is being referred to as “NF” here? Is the Neo Foundation not essentially composed of DHF and Erik Zhang? If so, what distinction is being made? It seems the platform was hijacked, but not by Erik. More importantly, the claim of “resource constraints” does not align with previously stated figures. If the Foundation truly controlled 25 million NEO earlier last year, how does the absence of 6.7 million NEO suddenly create constraints severe enough to justify emergency fiscal discipline? 4. “Figures will be shared as they become available” This statement is also highly problematic: “I will share preliminary figures as they become available.” It isn't very easy to believe that these figures are not already available. This is a blockchain-based project; balances are transparent by design. Even if funds were placed into investment vehicles, it should be easy to obtain the current balance. Suggesting that basic treasury figures are unavailable strains credibility and risks insulting the audience’s intelligence. Additionally, the post was published on December 31, and it is now January 5. If preliminary figures were genuinely pending, they should already exist by now. Finally, if, by any interpretation, the 6.7 million NEO attributed to Erik truly represents a “supermajority of funds held by NF,” then a far more serious and unanswered question remains: What happened to the remaining ~18 million NEO over the past nine months?

Day 16 of tweeting $NEO until @erikzhang buys some $NDMEME

Day 15 of tweeting $NEO until @erikzhang buys some $NDMEME

Day 14 of tweeting $NEO until @erikzhang buys some $NDMEME

Is the @Neo_Blockchain drama just for show, or is this real 🤔 Hmm, need to do some digging this year. Happy new year 🎆 2026 is @FlamingoFinance and @flm_fun's year 🍻

Day 13 of tweeting $NEO until @erikzhang buys some $NDMEME

Good — at least now there is a clear sign that a financial report will finally be produced. Before arguing how the treasury should be secured, let’s first clarify what exists. That is non-negotiable. You are the one who has been holding the majority of NF’s assets for years. So the question is straightforward and rests with you, not me: How much of NF’s total assets are currently under your control, and when will they be transferred to NF multisig custody? Before shifting the focus elsewhere, please answer that first.

Day 12 of tweeting $NEO until @erikzhang buys some $NDMEME