CITIZENS Don't Want It— Opposition MPs Oppose CAB 3
MPs Mount Strong Opposition to Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3
Opposition politicians, activists, and civil society groups have intensified their campaign against the proposed Constitutional Amendment Bill Number 3, commonly known as CAB3, describing it as a threat to Zimbabwe’s democracy and constitutional order.
Speaking during parliamentary debates on the Bill, several legislators voiced strong objections, arguing that the proposed amendments fail to address the country’s pressing socio-economic challenges, including unemployment, low wages, deteriorating public services, and corruption.
Among those opposing the Bill was Honourable Gladys Hlatshwayo, who said the legislation suffers from both procedural and substantive shortcomings. She argued that unlike the 2013 Constitution, which emerged from an inclusive and bipartisan process, CAB3 lacks broad national consensus and should therefore be rejected in its entirety.
Other legislators, including Honourable Ropafadzo Makumire, questioned the relevance of the proposed amendments at a time when many young Zimbabweans are struggling to find employment and make ends meet. Critics maintain that national priorities should focus on economic recovery and improving living standards rather than constitutional changes.
Former MP Joana Mamombe also weighed in on the debate, expressing concern over what she described as attempts to undermine democratic institutions and processes.
Meanwhile, President Nelson Chamisa praised contributions made by MP Mureri during the parliamentary debate, arguing that the proposed Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3 presents a constitutional conflict by potentially benefiting current office holders. Chamisa described the Bill as fundamentally flawed and maintained that any attempt to extend terms of office without broad public approval would face resistance from Zimbabweans
Opponents of the Bill have called for greater public awareness campaigns, urging citizens to engage in discussions about the implications of the proposed amendments. They argue that any significant constitutional changes should reflect the will of the people through broad consultation and democratic participation.
Meanwhile, supporters of the anti-CAB3 campaign insist that Zimbabweans have consistently voiced opposition to the Bill and have called for its withdrawal.
Debate over Constitutional Amendment Bill Number 3 continues both inside and outside Parliament, with the issue expected to remain a key point of political discussion in the months ahead.