Evolutionary social scientist, co-creator of @cah, co-host of Evolutionary Psychology (the podcast), blogs about bullshit at everythingisbullshit.blog

Joined November 2012
22 Photos and videos
I think AI discourse would greatly benefit from avoiding the quagmire of folk concepts like "intelligence" and "consciousness" while focusing on specific abilities that AIs do or do not have. For example, they're good at writing essays. They probably don't have nociceptors. Etc.
13
2
47
16,683
There is such a thing as being politically unbiased, and cool new work shows AIs are good at it.
What could it mean for an AI to be "politically neutral”? And can we measure it? New paper dataset. We propose a defn that applies to any type of conflict: a neutral response should maximize approval on both sides of an issue, while keeping that approval balanced. 1/🧵
7
9
1,831
Interesting new paper on the alliance politics of antisemitism. Conservatives are more likely to tolerate antisemitism with no justification, but liberals are more likely to tolerate antisemitism with an anti-Israel justification. eprints.soton.ac.uk/508855/1…

2
7
704
David Pinsof retweeted
"modern environmental features often appear unprecedented, yet they still map onto the same fundamental social challenges—cooperation, alliance formation, threat management, and status competition—that shaped human psychology over evolutionary time" cambridge.org/core/journals/…
3
10
1,081
David Pinsof retweeted
Humans are not simply “good” or “evil.” Some of the worst atrocities in history are driven by moral conviction: empathy, solidarity, and a perceived duty to protect one’s own group. A fascinating new study on armed groups in Congo shows that many people who participate in genocidal violence are not psychopaths, but ordinary individuals motivated by loyalty, empathy, and the belief that they are doing good for their community.
Violent people, soldiers, who are responsible for hundreds or thousands of deaths, are not psychopaths. They are driven by empathy toward their own. To kill is a duty, justified by past actions. This paper is an extraordinary look into *why* genocide happens. 1/
9
15
67
8,972
David Pinsof retweeted
Are the Brooms Multiplying Yet? The Sorcerer's Apprentice and the Evolution of AI Citing @lucsteels @WillRinehart @hendrycks @sebkrier @DavidPinsof @simonfriederich @Noahpinion @s_r_constantin
3
2
10
2,624
David Pinsof retweeted
Does partisanship affect justifications of political violence? Berntzen et al. find that both Democrats and Republicans are more likely to justify identical acts of political violence when the victims are from the opposing party. Read now: doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfag010
1
23
54
9,175
David Pinsof retweeted
Cards Against Humanity co-creator and evolutionary psychologist David Pinsof has some deep theories on status-seeking, humor, and more. I think you'll like this one.
Had a great time chatting with Zachary Elwood on People who Read People. Youtube: substack.com/@zacharyelwood/… Podcast: podcasts.apple.com/us/podcas…
2
12
1,205
Had a great time chatting with Zachary Elwood on People who Read People. Youtube: substack.com/@zacharyelwood/… Podcast: podcasts.apple.com/us/podcas…

2
4
14
2,485
I really don’t understand why cognition “built on embodied perception” and the brain simply being a computer are mutually exclusive.
A new paper challenges the traditional idea that the brain is simply a computer. Instead, it argues that human cognition and personality are built on embodied perception, relying on our ability to maintain a "grip" on reality. dlvr.it/TS6TL1
5
3
26
2,935
David Pinsof retweeted
"If you watch lots of great movies, your desire for great movies will not diminish. No, you will become a film snob and watch 7-hour black-and-white films about the collapse of a farming collective in post-communist Hungary." 😂😂😂
I wrote about enduring satisfaction, how it is impossible to obtain (sorry), how its impossibility was likely built into us by natural selection, and how self-help gurus can trick us into thinking they can provide it. (Link below).
1
3
6
672
I wrote about enduring satisfaction, how it is impossible to obtain (sorry), how its impossibility was likely built into us by natural selection, and how self-help gurus can trick us into thinking they can provide it. (Link below).
3
6
16
2,379
Is it just me or has AI doomerism gradually transitioned from "AI will literally kill us all" to "AI will cause bad things to happen / Humans will do stupid things with AI / AI will cause huge changes." If so, this is a very positive development.
13
4
34
8,439
David Pinsof retweeted
🔪"Yea, life is beautiful and every moment is precious or whatever, but there’s another side of the story you almost never hear: most of life is pretty stressful, mediocre, and unsatisfying, and then you die." everythingisbullshit.blog/p/…
3
7
19
1,706
"All humans strive to be happy in some form." Citation needed.
The pursuit of happiness: pitfalls and promises Review by Iris B. Mauss (@IrisMauss) & Brett Q. Ford (@BrettQFord) Free access before May 15: tinyurl.com/33ur58bs
1
5
25
1,836
A very positive development. Still, should be higher.
Philosophers cite more empirical sources than they used to
2
2
30
2,102
Part of my goal with @DavePietrasz and our podcast is to kill the idea that this is what evolutionary psychology is.
say what you will about evolutionary psychology but I think no other social science would have predicted the median voter being this
2
6
26
2,711
How much AI replaces artists and writers will be a good test of how important social signaling is to these fields. I think social signaling is hugely important, so I predict continued resistance to AI art and writing, and a strong preference for human creativity.
3
19
730