The panic-stricken efforts by the state to force digital ID on the proles while simultaneously securing anonymity and cover for themselves and their own is a wonder to behold.

Starmer: We want to digitally ID everyone who uses social media Brits: Absolutely Not! Starmer: OK then, we want to ban under 16s from social media (by digitally ID-ing everyone) Brits: OMG that’s a great idea. Idk what idiot would be against that 🥴

This censorship law is a wolf in sheep’s clothing. The real goal is to enable the UK government to track everyone.

Pakistani Muslim a Home Office employee was caught “fixing” the visas for his fellow countrymen for cash..

Jeremy Clarkson says the government’s reported plan to impose a 9pm social media curfew on 16 and 17 yr olds makes no sense. “You don’t trust them to be on social media after 9pm, yet you’re happy for them to vote. How does that work? Am I taking crazy pills?” Clarkson asked.

🚨NEW: YouTube has released a statement regarding Keir Starmer’s announcement of BANNING social media for under 16s 🇬🇧 "YouTube is a vital resource for young people, educators and parents. Blanket bans push kids out of such curated, supervised, beneficial experiences and towards anonymous, less safe services" Unfortunately, that’s exactly where Starmer would like children to be, in less safe spaces - hence why he isn’t going to ban BlueSky….

here's what will happen. - u16 ban passes, platforms must verify all ages - kids use VPNs, government bans VPNs - age verification infrastructure already exists, its scope gets broader, more invasive, more extreme - Online Safety Act forces backdoors into encrypted messaging, E2E encryption dies, gov can read everything you ever send - CBDC rolls out, your internet passport and financial passport become the same document - anonymous accounts posting "wrongthink" are now identifiable prosecutable - the generation that grows up with this doesn't remember it being any other way - George Orwell was right about everything - it's over

Reminder. A social media ban was NOT in Labour's 2024 Manifesto. Neither was Digital I.D. Oh, or State Suicide. Or binning the two child benefit cap.

Any attempt to impose mandatory Digital ID will be fully repealed, scrapped and eradicated by a Restore Britain Government.

"72% support for ageverification bans on under-16s? Bullshit. Ipsos polled just 1,088 Brits ONLINE in January. That's not 'the public'.... it's a tiny, self-selected slice pushed by loaded questions that ignore digital ID creep, VPNs, enforcement failures & free speech. propaganda at its finest

Let's build the full picture of what the UK government has announced this month. Every device in the country: scanned for nudity. Signal: ordered to build a backdoor. Every stolen iPhone: remotely disabled by law enforcement on request. children: banned from disappearing messages, VPNs, livestreaming, romantic AI. though Bluesky is exempted actually. and now: every adult who wants to use social media must verify their identity with a passport, credit card, facial recognition, or government digital ID. Your face. to tweet. A registry of every adult in the country who uses the internet, tied to their real identity, held by platforms that have already sold data to Cambridge Analytica, already been fined billions for privacy violations, already shared data with governments on request. Scans your device. Knows your face. Knows your real name behind every account. Can disable your phone. Has a backdoor into your messages. This is not about children.

Keir Starmer is banning several apps including X from full access by under 16 year olds. Australia recently did something similar. Guess which app they both didn't ban? Bluesky. Here is an older post from bluesky highliting the issues they had with child abuse material. How is X banned and Bluesky not?

Australia banned X for children but not BlueSky. Britain is banning X for children but not BlueSky. This proves one thing. It's not about protecting children. It's about censorship and controlling the narrative.

🚨 A "BIG MOMENT FOR OUR COUNTRY." Good morning to the millions of everyday Brits waking up to a new digital prison. Keir Starmer has just officially announced his blanket ban on social media for teenagers! He literally stood at a podium, rambled on about his childhood in the 1970s, and claimed he is doing this to keep your kids safe. 🤡 You honestly have to laugh at the sheer delusion. He completely refuses to protect our actual streets from violent criminals, but he is completely obsessed with policing your family's phones. Do not be fooled for a single second! To enforce this ban, every single adult in Britain will now be forced to upload a passport or digital ID just to browse the web! This is not about child safety. It is a massive Trojan horse for total state surveillance. RT if you see right through this scam and refuse to let the Labour elite control us! 🇬🇧🔥

Gabe Einhorn, the guy posting private business communications, runs an ID verification company called VryfID. So, the company you’re supposed to trust with your confidential information, is doxxing people for things they say in private.

Have you ever seen someone get so excited about banning kids from using YouTube? He's actually giddy with glee Complete sociopath

The start of digital ID is here - disguised as ‘protecting children.’ First: social media restrictions for under-16s. Next: mandatory real ID registration just to post online. Then: every post, comment & opinion policed - affecting your digital ID score, which tracks and controls every part of your life (travel, bookings, banking, services). This isn’t safety. It’s total surveillance & control.

🚨NEW: Rupert Lowe has responded to the UK government’s decision to BAN under 16s from social media 🇬🇧 “Banning teenagers from social media with ludicrous conditions is unworkable, unrealistic and unwanted. Here’s a mad idea - let parents parent. Not the state, but mums, dads, grandparents or whoever else. Restore Britain will always trust the family over big government.” COMMON SENSE POLITICS 🫡

It was nice the government backed off from Digital ID after overwhelming backlash. Hmmm, new policy, how do they enforce this then....

So we just let Internet curfews for 17-year-olds happen, like we're North Korea or China, and no one bats an eyelid because "social media bad"? This is sinister, controlling, dangerous stuff.