Joined July 2014
- Tweets 165
- Following 308
- Followers 302
- Likes 473
3 Photos and videos
Felipe Diaz-Griffero retweeted
19 Mar 2024
A Jungle Myna pet bird from China has been trained to go out and look for cash, then bring it back home with him
1,124
4,396
65,392
20,494,352
Felipe Diaz-Griffero retweeted
18 Mar 2024
this still makes me laugh
120
1,464
23,903
1,107,843
15 Mar 2024
Great to have the visit of Peter Palese at Einstein @vinayaka1prasad @gvkalpana
ALT Dinner with Peter, Prasad and Kalpana
2
12
309
31 Jan 2024
kudos to Katarzina Bialas, for a beautiful review....congratulations!
sciencedirect.com/science/ar…
2
235
Felipe Diaz-Griffero retweeted
12 Jul 2023
We are looking for a post-doctoral fellow with experience in fluorescent microscopy. Experience in spinning disk live imaging is highly desirable - please pass this on and ask them to message me directly if there is interest.
11
11
2,339
Felipe Diaz-Griffero retweeted
45
451
2,318
250,930
7 Jul 2023
We greatly acknowledge the contributions of Charlotte, Vineet, and Eun to our understanding of HIV-1's capacity to facilitate the translocation of CPSF6/CPSF5 to nuclear speckles/biomolecular condensates. Thank you. nature.com/articles/s41598-0…
15
925
Felipe Diaz-Griffero retweeted
9 May 2023
Excited to join former Maniatis members in celebrating Tom's birthday at this event. Tom is an exceptional mentor, a champion for his trainees, and an amazing scientist. The world definitely needs more Toms to continue inspiring future generations of researchers.
9 May 2023
events.columbia.edu/go/tom_m…
Join us in this journey to the birth of molecular biology through the history of the one and only Tom Maniatis!!!
1
9
2,552
Felipe Diaz-Griffero retweeted
📢 SPECIAL SEMINAR 📢 The @IcahnInstitute and @SinaiImmunol are hosting a very special guest speaker THIS THURSDAY. Özlem Türeci, MD is a renowned immunologist and physician-scientist, celebrated for her pivotal role in the development of the world's first mRNA COVID-19 vaccine.
1
13
33
26,553
Authors’ names have ‘astonishing’ influence on peer reviewers go.nature.com/3Cv4WoZ
8
51
160
Felipe Diaz-Griffero retweeted
25 Oct 2022
Looking for a new position? We are hiring at multiple levels for projects in infectious disease, neuroscience, and cancer. Recruiting both computational and experimental expertise. Come join our team! kroganlab.ucsf.edu/join-our-…
1
5
Felipe Diaz-Griffero retweeted
25 Oct 2022
Dinner with @PaulBieniasz the first in-person seminar speaker in Department of Microbiology &Immunology @EinsteinMed after a fabulous talk on SARS COV2 antibodies! With @ChandranLab, @gvkalpana and @DiazGrifferoLab
2
3
36
Felipe Diaz-Griffero retweeted
22 Oct 2022
Come and join us !
17 Oct 2022
Honoured to co-organise the 13th International Symposium of Gunma University Initiative for Advanced Research entitled “Translational Cancer Research – New Trends and Future Drugs“, November 29th 2022. It's online and free. For more: giar.gunma-u.ac.jp/eng/13th-…
2
3
Felipe Diaz-Griffero retweeted
20 Oct 2022
Accepting and rejecting papers is an archaic practice that is terrible for science. It strips peer review of its value & institutionalizes the practice of judging scientists based on where, rather than what, they publish. It's time for this system to go.
elifesciences.org/articles/8…
54
265
935
20 Oct 2022
In the face of these pathologies, scientists across the world are taking tangible action to make science publishing and its place in science better. They preprint their work, advocate for others to do so, and quash efforts to treat preprints as lesser works of science
20 Oct 2022
Accepting and rejecting papers is an archaic practice that is terrible for science. It strips peer review of its value & institutionalizes the practice of judging scientists based on where, rather than what, they publish. It's time for this system to go.
elifesciences.org/articles/8…
20 Oct 2022
judging scientists based on where, rather than what, they publised has transformed journals from a means of communicating science into gatekeepers whose judgments – heavily bias, faddishness and chance – can determine which science gets seen, and which scientists succeed.
20 Oct 2022
Accepting and rejecting papers is an archaic practice that is terrible for science. It strips peer review of its value & institutionalizes the practice of judging scientists based on where, rather than what, they publish. It's time for this system to go.
elifesciences.org/articles/8…
2
20 Oct 2022
Adios supreme judges, you will no longer hold the key...only the results and time will...
20 Oct 2022
Accepting and rejecting papers is an archaic practice that is terrible for science. It strips peer review of its value & institutionalizes the practice of judging scientists based on where, rather than what, they publish. It's time for this system to go.
elifesciences.org/articles/8…
1
Felipe Diaz-Griffero retweeted
Big thanks to all participants of this year's #RetroPath 2022, you all made it into a fantastic meeting!
1
8
17