Like buy tokens.com and showing how the SAS works. Tokens.com #GatewayToRealEstateLiquidity @tZERO and @BedBathBeyond This would be fun to try. Let’s see

NYSE will likely use tZERO patents to tokenize their exchange. Offering 24/7 trading & instant settlement. This will be roughly $115 million in revenue once it's fully rolled out. At a sass valuation of 30x that is $3.45 billion valuation just from toll booth patient fees.

Ive been more directionally correct with my criticism than probably anyone. Things that used to be shocking for bros to hear and would make them so angry, they now agree and say all the time. 🤷🏻‍♂️

Validating step for on-chain equity - particularly direct onchain issuer led tokenization which we believe in. Computershare’s ISTs bring tokenized shares directly into issuers’ capital structure with compliance and control intact. tZERO’s end to end infrastructure stack for regulated issuance, ATS trading, settlement, and regulated onchain custody delivers the full lifecycle issuers need today - as we work with issuers and other partners ready for production-grade tokenization. The path of this industry is not zero sum.

Thrilled to deliver on next steps in our promise to fully tokenize tZERO Group, Inc.’s flagship private markets asset and transition it to our special purpose broker-dealer custody, one of only two in the US. accessnewswire.com/newsroom/…

In under 6 months, /mkt: — Formed a broker-dealer — Filed Form BD — Submitted Form NMA — Integrated tZERO's ATS — Underwrote 100 athletes — Shipped a working trading platform Team of 10 . Under $1M deployed. Founder-funded. Now raising Series A.

Dont know but I guess the wrong man to ask. My math is according to some very wrong (mostly by people with different books) but there never was any real engagement other than @StephaneDeBaets which I appreciated. The name calling, aggressive insults and disclosure of personal position and information have been beyond. I am out there with a real account and rep. The dollars invested in pref and ord are worth more than dollars invested in $tzrop is the rationale of the @tzero Board. Even while we are the ones that need to make changes to the current agreements in place @Alan_Konevsky . Think about that in the light of the cap table. An instrument that should have never been marketed as such to retail. I question a lot of things. Remember how they treated you for the last 7 years and how they deal with you here today with all the threats and scare tactics. The democratize finance mantra is gone here. My vote remains NO. Why vote yes? At least i have a legal position to fight for in the future. I fought for the $tzrop holders and rightly so. Others should have joined that one for a fair treatment of retail holders. We were there at reasonable terms and wanted the business to continue. Even wanted to allocate more capital in order to resolve in an amicable way. The greed on the other side was too big though, an almost free reset for the people responsible for this mess. I wish @tzero the best. Assume they got the vote. Insiders will know, ask them. It was a convoluted vote in any case. For now time some people reflect. Including me? Yeah maybe but at least I have a clean conscience. Good luck

@TZERO raised capital at $7.00 per $tzrop token. TZERO raised $0.55 per pref B share 4yrs later. Fair match if we convert at 12.73 pref B shares per token. $tzrop downgrades in seniority, loses revenue dividend etc. Stop all the scare tactics and exclusive spaces. Get on with it

DISCLAIMER: This is my personal opinion only, based solely on tZERO’s public materials and Jeroen’s breakeven framework. It is NOT legal, tax, investment, or financial advice. I am not soliciting votes, proxies, or any action. I am a TZROP holder sharing my own analysis. Everyone should read the official tZERO documents (including the Dahn report), review all assumptions, consult their own advisors, and make their own independent decision. PFD A’s, PFD B’s, and Common are not the same instrument. They are different equity securities issued by the same company, with potentially different economic, liquidation, conversion, voting, information, and transferability rights. That matters here. In my view, it is too simplistic to treat a thin OTC quote as the full answer for TZROP value. TZROP traded in a constrained market with limited liquidity, limited access, and limited price discovery. So I view quoted price as one data point, not a complete measure of underlying economic value. By comparison, the original TZROP raise brought in roughly $134M in a regulated offering at prices up to $10 per token. I am not saying that means TZROP is automatically worth $10 today. I am saying original capital formation at scale is, in my opinion, a more meaningful reference point than thin secondary trading alone.

From the breakeven math: • Pref B ≈ $113M • Common ≈ $298M • TZROP (3:1) ≈ $1B That’s not just a difference — that’s a completely different participation curve.

That’s not my call. It’s our call . 10 is the floor not the ceiling

Are you the rugpuller or the rugpullee?