Medical Oncologist. "Targeted therapies for targeted populations”

Joined June 2014
236 Photos and videos
Pinned Tweet
Personalized Antibodies for Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma (PANGEA): A Phase II Study Evaluating an Individualized Treatment Strategy for Metastatic Disease cancerdiscovery.aacrjournals…

5
25
105
#CM577 If only we could have known years ago, maybe we could’ve spared all those patients ineffective (worse than nothing?), toxic expensive therapy.
#CM577 there is no benefit (especially CPS0) in CPS low/neg tumors. 44% of pts. And this is not even by histology which would make adenocarcinoma look even worse. Why is this buried in the supplement? & Why would you give this drug for a year to people having no benefit?
1
5
17
3,402
#MATTERHORN Phase III FLOT durvalumab or placebo #dejavu #samsara
Replying to @LizzySmyth1
HR 0.78 NS per the presentation but not in the paper (rather HR 0.99 <12m HR 0.67) >12m) Where have we seen this tuning fork curve before? ~1/3 pts no diff. CM577 I think it’s a good idea to see the results by PDL1 1, 5, 10: will likely show same thing as all previous studies
4
12
892
Better late than never, I guess.
📢 FDA ODAC gets it ✅️ for patients Immune checkpoint inhibitors are a PD-L1 targeted 🎯 therapy in GEA. No target, no efficacy. Let's focus on: ➡️ alternative targets (CLD 18.2, FGFR2b, MTAP...) ➡️ overcoming immune evasion (bispecifics, T-cell engagers, CAR-T..)
1
1
10
1,555
#TOPGEAR @ESMO2024 - periop chemo /- RT for #GEA - no benefit adding RT - now 6 Phase 3 studies w/o CRT benefit vs or added to neoADJ/ADJ tx for GEA: - CRITICS, ARTIST1, ARTIST2, neoAEGIS, ESOPEC, TOPGEAR - SOC is periop #FLOT for all GEA
Time to move away from radiotherapy in operable GEA #ESMO24 TOPGEAR ➡️ no survival benefit when RT added to periop chemo TOPGEAR ESOPEC : both great trials with a definitive answer = no more RT ✅Great drugs in development - let's focus on systemic Rx for cure @myESMO
2
17
52
11,294
Daniel Catenacci retweeted
🚨PRODIGE23🚨 Long term results now published! T3-4 rectal adenocarcinoma Randomized: CRT➡️🔪➡️FOLFOX mFOLFIRINOX ➡️ CRT➡️🔪➡️FOLFOX ✅✅✅Improved OS!!! Looking forward to JANUS clarifying if TNT with FOLFIRINOX vs. FOLFOX improves cCR and/or DFS/OS pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3898…
2
97
216
18,943
Already Approved in Japan 3/26/24. Different manufacturing sites for the two countries hopefully?? astellas.com/en/system/files…

4
310
Thank you for this very pivotal study to streamline perioperative therapy for esophageal and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. #ESOPEC
14 Jun 2024
🔥 ASCO 2024 Plenary: Prof Dr @JDekervel (UZ Leuven) and Prof Dr @FlorianLordick (University of Leipzig) discuss the ESOPEC trial, comparing FLOT perioperative chemotherapy with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus or oesophagogastric junction.
1
10
2,041
Daniel Catenacci retweeted
14 Jun 2024
🔥 ASCO 2024 Plenary: Prof Dr @JDekervel (UZ Leuven) and Prof Dr @FlorianLordick (University of Leipzig) discuss the ESOPEC trial, comparing FLOT perioperative chemotherapy with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus or oesophagogastric junction.
1
3
13
4,290
Daniel Catenacci retweeted
Yes research warranted, not SOC. Control here arm did very well compared to overt stage IV disease, as expected, since these are highly selected patients. This control arm is so critical because it normalizes and shows that they do well, but not due to the surgical intervention.
1
1
593
IKF-575/#RENAISSANCE phase III Addressing #oligometastatic #GEA more aggressively, my heart said yes, but my brain said no:
3
10
1,753
Daniel Catenacci retweeted
I guess we must agree to disagree until we see prospective phase 3 data. Thankfully others have actually done this study and asked this very pertinent question as to the utility of RT in EGJ AC and not danced around it for 20 years. Would you change your opinion based on esopec?
1
2
Daniel Catenacci retweeted
Do you call the benefit of CROSS over surgery alone ‘modest’ with a HR of 0.75? FLOT had HR of 0.76 over ECF which previously had a HR of 0.74 over surgery alone. There is nothing more to say. Ultimately you either see it and it is obvious or you dont. But you eventually will.
1
2
4
Daniel Catenacci retweeted
Unfair comparison of ITT R0 in FLOT vs R0 of those going to surgery in CROSS. Also,Why compare surrogate endpnts of OS when we actually have the OS to compare? The controlled studies are coming.Will be some disappointed folks likely. See here: meetinglibrary.asco.org/reco… @RenoHemonc

1
1
5
Daniel Catenacci retweeted
Looking forward to debating Dr Ilson!! (FLOT vs CROSS #31.)@agrothey @ILSONDavid
Looking forward to discussions with my colleagues during Great Debates in GI Malignancies next week! @GreatDebatesGI
4
5
29
Daniel Catenacci retweeted
#justmath I particularly like the comment that this is homework for 9-yr olds...@GermanBiotech CROSS-trial comparisons r tricky, but it's the HR compared to controls that are useful here... Of course we await ESOPEC, but for now, the evidence points in a certain direction...no?
3
4
21
Daniel Catenacci retweeted
Hey #medtwitter, I need some help with the math on this one: @OncoAlert If B - A = X & C - A = X & B=C & D - B = X & D - C = Y Can we solve for Y?
2% Y=Z
2% Y=A
85% Y=X
10% Indeterminate
206 votes • Final results
8
2
9
Daniel Catenacci retweeted
Last, I would say that ~90% of pts will have a PET response w FLOT, & we saw this also w FOLFIRINOX. These pts are not at risk for R1 resection. One might consider CROSS for those ~10% who don’t, with the caveat that those are the resilient tumors that may also be radioresistant.
1
1
6
682
Daniel Catenacci retweeted
Tweet 6/6: From tweet 5/6, if we have a prospective study that seeks organ preservation, documents differences in QOL, & risk of local/distant recurrence & OS comparing dCRT vs, hopefully what is now everyone’s standard, perioperative FLOT, then great, & pts can make a choice.
1
1
6
683