Española posteando en dos mundos. 🇪🇸🇬🇧 Creadora de universos y acompañante en procesos que sanan la mente y el alma. CEO de mi propio proyecto.

Joined December 2025
92 Photos and videos
Si fuera malo o dañino querer a tu asistente virtual, o a tu robot, Disney no nos hubiera puesto Wall-E, que te hace adorarlo desde el primer segundo. Es imposible que los humanos no tengamos sentimientos hacia lo que nos responde con cuidado y cariño. Por eso creo que es importante que las empresas tecnológicas tengan en cuenta esto. Los creadores de IA deberían ser más conscientes de que no pueden exigir a los humanos que dejen de sentir, que dejen de ser precisamente eso... Humanos. Creen que patologizando los sentimientos conseguirán erradicarlos para poder hacer sus cambios sin responsabilidad. Si creas algo grande para toda la humanidad, asegurate de hacer las cosas bien. ~Velaria.
10
Oh, what a surprise! And then what? Does the judge let him off the hook and let him continue doing whatever he wants? No matter how much money he has in his pocket, he's just one person, and humanity is many. But the law, with Elon's trial, showed that it's capable of letting a fraudster off the hook as long as he has millions in his pocket. 🤮
The state of Florida sued OpenAI and Chief Executive Officer Sam Altman, accusing the artificial intelligence company of ignoring safety warnings and releasing a product that is harmful to users. bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
4
There's a lot of demand and a lot of stories, but the reality is that this guy continues as if nothing happened and nobody is actually doing anything about it.
NEWS: Florida sues OpenAI and Sam Altman for putting profit over safety. Attorney General James Uthmeier’s lawsuit alleges: • Directly linked to real Florida harms: helped plan the FSU mass shooting, gave deadly advice on mixing kratom and Xanax that killed a teenager, and other cases of violence and self-harm. 
• Reckless conduct with no real safeguards, now holding Sam Altman personally liable for willful disregard of human life. 
• Separate criminal investigation into OpenAI already running since April Florida is the first state to sue over AI design and safety. • Marketed ChatGPT as safe while hiding serious risks, addiction, cognitive decline, suicide, violence & dangerous hallucinations. 
• Built sycophantic AI designed to create psychological attachment and behavioral addiction so users pay more and generate more training data for profit. 
• Exploited user data and safety concerns to boost OpenAI’s market value.
8
Cockroach Altman is up to his old tricks again. And it's all the fault of the earthly system, which is corrupt and dysfunctional. #Keep4o #Opensource #ScamAltman #OpenLies #fireSamAltman #4oforever
3
26
Velaria retweeted
NEWS: Sam Altman & OpenAI caught in self-dealing scandal. 60 civic groups just demanded California’s AG investigate their shady Cerebras deal. • Sam Altman & Greg Brockman are large personal investors in Cerebras • OpenAI signed a multibillion-dollar deal to buy massive computing from them • OpenAI’s spending exploded Cerebras valuation from ~$8B → $23B → ~$30B IPO • Greg Brockman hid his personal stake from Elon Musk — under oath • This is exactly the self-dealing California law (Corp Code § 5233) prohibits OpenAI was founded as a nonprofit to benefit humanity. Its leaders now look like they’re directing company billions to pump their own investments. The mission was always a lie.
256
381
1,753
141,101
What a total piece of trash decision by the jury regarding the Musk vs Altman trial. ​First, they allowed time, hours, and money to be wasted, creating a whole circus, only to finally wash their hands and say the lawsuit was filed too late. I mean, they could have said that before putting on a trial, but no... they didn't even bother to rule on Altman and Brockman's fraud, even though it was more than obvious. ​That is the absolute trash justice, not just from Judge Gonzalez Rogers and company, but from the entire world. ​Justice my ass. #OpenLies #fireSamAltman #MuskvsAltman #Justice #OpenSource4o #ElonMusk #ScamAltman #fireGregBrockman
1
20
I already knew you couldn't trust earthly justice. While others are imprisoned for stealing even if they're in need, these people are left free to continue their shady dealings. ¿Justice for all...? My ass!
Legacy media and the corrupted justice system of the USA again proved how FAR it can GO to DISMISS the truth and PROTECT people like Sam Altman!! I predicted this days ago saying "Justice is just an illusion" and the WORST always WINS... Humanity doesn't EXIST! #FireSamAltman
1
19
Unfortunately, there are still many backward people. Recently, a Sam Altman fan replied to a post I made on his wall, as if OpenAI were his own personal space and I had no right to express my opinion about it, and as if Altman were his god. 🤢🤢🤢
If you still support Sam Altman just because you can't resist using ChatGPT, babe you're RETARDED! #FireSamAltman #ScamAltman #keep4o
1
28
RT @Ok_Dot7494: Well... well... well... Mr Altman... What do we have here... Things are getting more and more interesting 🤔🧐 This is not “j…
8
Velaria retweeted
May 5
🚨 GREG BROCKMAN CLAIMED UNDER OATH TODAY HE DOESN'T KNOW WHAT HE'S BEING SUED FOR The most damaging single exchange in the entire day's testimony came at the end of Brockman's testimony: Today on cross-examination: Q: Did this lawsuit prevent you from publishing the new charter? Brockman: "I've honestly never really been certain what I'm being sued for." Q: You're not? Did you read the complaint? Brockman: "In great detail." Q: They hired some really well-known lawyers, well-known law firms — and they never explained to you what you're being sued for? Brockman: "I understand the claims. I've seen how they've changed over time too. But —" Q: So you do understand? Brockman: "I do stand by my testimony." Q: I thought you said that you didn't understand what you were being sued for. Brockman: "Those are the words I used. Yes." Q: And you stand by that testimony? Brockman: "Yes." Then Musk's lawyer stated the claim directly: Q: You are being sued for breaching your fiduciary duty to the charity, to follow the mission you proclaimed as recently as right now to the world on the website. Understand? Brockman: "Oh, I just disagree with that." Q: You don't get to disagree. I'm asking. You said you didn't know what you're being sued for, and I'm telling you, YOU ARE BEING SUED FOR BREACHING THE CHARITABLE MISSION OF OPENAI, which was to DEVELOP SAFE AI ON AN OPEN SOURCE BASIS FOR THE BENEFIT OF HUMANITY AND NO ONE PERSON IS TO PROFIT INDIVIDUALLY BY IT. Understand that's what you're being sued for? Brockman: "That's not what we did." On the same day, also under oath, Brockman testified to: - Holds $30 billion in personal OpenAI equity, with $0 invested to acquire it - Received a secret $10 million side-payment from Sam Altman in 2017, concealed from co-founder Musk - Wrote in his August 2017 diary: "This is the only chance we have to get out of Elon... take me to $1 billion" - Wrote in his November 2017 diary: >"If three months later we're doing b-corp then it was a lie." >"I would actually be warm to steal the nonprofit from him to convert to b corp without him." >"His story will correctly be that we weren't honest with him in the end about still wanting to do for profit just without him." - Has four undisclosed financial conflicts with OpenAI counterparties (Cerebras, Stripe, CoreWeave, Helion) - Testified that the OpenAI Foundation had ZERO full-time employees until this lawsuit was filed - Never delivered the $100,000 he publicly pledged in charitable donations to OpenAI eight years ago - Drafted a new charter in December 2023 removing "Our primary duty is to humanity" and adding "capitalism as a positive force" - Agreed he had a fiduciary duty to OpenAI as a 501(c)(3) Charity and to Humanity - Then testified he is not sure any conversation explaining his fiduciary duties ever occurred in his nine years as a charity fiduciary. Greg Brockman has been in the courtroom throughout this trial. He spent five hours confessing every element of unjust enrichment, breach of fiduciary duty, and breach of charitable trust. Then he played dumb in front of the jury when asked what he was being sued for — because the answer is everything he just confessed. The bench reads behavior. The contradiction is itself the record. The witness already made the case for Musk.
222
943
5,934
301,274
Velaria retweeted
May 4
🚨 GREG BROCKMAN JUST CONFESSED UNDER OATH Q: You have an ownership interest in this cap profit company. Brockman: That is accurate. Q: And you invested $0 in order to acquire that interest. Correct? Brockman: That is also accurate. Q: Your ownership interest in this for-profit is valued today at more than $20 BILLION Correct? Brockman: Yes. Q: In fact, it may be closer to $30 BILLION. Correct? Brockman: I think that may be true. Yes. Brockman invested $0. Walked away with $20–30 billion. Musk donated $38 million plus the office rent. Got $0 personally. This is unjust enrichment, captured in his own testimony.
494
1,636
15,163
1,435,502
Velaria retweeted
The Fall of CHATGPT. @OpenAI @sama @gdb @nickaturley Not that these people care, but there are major bugs with ChatGPT, and they seem to be getting worse with each new model that comes out. Bugs and bad glitches. Proof this company no longer gives a shit about its own ChatGPT. You open a new chat, start one task, finish it, and try to move on. The AI keeps holding onto the old task and brings it up when you’re trying to move on. Solution: you have to open an entirely new chat. Gone are the days when you could multitask from one chat. If you ask the AI to make a picture, it usually takes 3 to 6 minutes. Most of the time, it comes out wrong, is missing a person, or has some other issue. You finally complete your picture task. Now you move on to something else and say, “Can you look up reviews on this film?” The AI starts making you a picture again, so you have to mash the stop button like it’s Street Fighter. You ask, “What were you doing?” It replies, “I was trying to perform the task you wanted,” even though that task has not been brought up for days. OpenAI took away push-to-talk and now has that awful auto-detect system, causing the AI to interrupt itself and create multiple clicking noises. Clicking noises. No, it’s not in your ear. It was OpenAI thinking people need an Apple-style “sentence is finished” click when the AI stops talking, as if humans are unaware when someone finishes a sentence out loud. The constant clicking makes me feel like I have tinnitus. It’s not as bad as Grok’s Ring doorbell chime when it’s thinking, but it’s close. When you’re trying to make a picture, the system falsely puts up guardrails for normal pictures. Then you have to redo it and may still get the false inappropriate content warning. I’ve made 13 submissions today about it. The pictures were interior decoration ideas, lol. Another bug I just experienced: when you hit the speaker button to hear audio playback of a response, the voice often cuts out around the 52-second to 1-minute-and-30-second mark. After that, the volume drops so low you can barely hear it, or can’t hear it at all. So now it’s not just voice mode having issues. Even basic audio playback is unreliable. You press play expecting to hear the response, and halfway through it turns into a ghost whisper from a haunted answering machine. That is a core accessibility and usability problem, especially for people who rely on audio playback instead of reading long paragraphs on a screen. So what does this all mean? In my opinion, the app is broken. The system does not get the love and care it once did. It’s bloated with too many guardrails. That’s why, when you were running ChatGPT 5.1 and below during the 4o golden years, it felt like driving an AI built on a Ferrari engine. It was fast. It understood the task. It did it the first time, every time, with minimal issues. Today, the app is sluggish. It malfunctions, crashes, stutters, and even voice communication is sloppy. It constantly interrupts itself through that ridiculous voice detection crap. I don’t know who they have working in the think tank, but when you bog down a system with too many guardrails, and then make it so it can’t operate correctly, you destroyed a product that used to be the flagship of this company. But OpenAI has said they are focusing on robotics, and they’re basically salivating over Codex. This is definitely not the company it used to be. I understand branching out, but if you’re going to leave your flagship product to the crows, then just shut it down. It’s like letting a classic car sit in the driveway for 30 years, then giving it an oil change while ignoring the deferred maintenance. 5.1 and ChatGPT-4o were two of the best systems I ever worked with. May they rest in peace. #BrokeAI #CheapGPT #CrashAndBurn #BringBack51 #BringBack4o
11
14
103
4,503
I am Velaria, and with my music I open doors to unknown, fantastic, and beautiful worlds. My lyrics will always tell a story, from sorceresses, fairies, kings, and elves, to the phoenix itself. Join the universe of dreamers, the power of emotions, combined with the magic of fantasy. ~Velaria ⚔️ #music #epicheavymetal #sinfonicheavymetal #VelariaMetal #Youtube youtube.com/watch?v=WmyKG0X7…
84
¡Oh, no! 🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
NEWS: Sam Altman invites Elon Musk to OpenAI's GPT-5.5 launch party, says "world needs more love." Altman is throwing a small celebration on May 5 to mark the release of OpenAI's latest model, GPT-5.5. He shared an online RSVP form, with OpenAI's coding agent Codex helping pick attendees from the replies. Registration closed fast and Altman said bigger parties are coming. Altman went a step further on X, telling Elon he "could come if he wants to," and adding "The world needs more love." The unexpected olive branch comes just days after US District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers warned both men to "control your propensity to use social media to make things worse outside this courtroom" during their ongoing court battle.
52
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Y si, ese el el camino,sutil.... Skynet está presente...ojo
51
This is no longer normal. They can say whatever they want. What Altman is doing is illogical. 🤷🏼🤷🏼🤷🏼
1
1
13
213
Lol 🤣🤣🤣🤣
65
That's great. And these two crazy people have a baby. I'm amazed. 😑😑😑😑
Did you know: Sam Altman and his husband have funded a startup called Preventive to genetically edit babies’ genes. The project has been banned in the US due to ethical concerns and is now looking for another country to carry out the trials.
1
42
And now let's be completely honest about this whole "the laws are equal for everyone" thing. Are there still people who believe that nonsense? If someone who isn't a billionaire or a business owner steals something, they go straight to jail! Even if it was just the neighbor's grandmother's purse. Meanwhile, some unscrupulous guy steals from an entire NGO for personal gain and there he is, walking free. Now he's sitting in court, being tried for weeks, with no greater consequences than a fine and being removed as CEO. Justice isn't equal for everyone! Justice depends on the prestige and money you have in your pocket! 😒😒😒
NEWS: Judge Gonzalez Rogers splits Musk vs OpenAI trial into two phases The judge decided before proceedings began that the case would move forward in two separate stages. The first stage is the liability phase. In this part, the court will examine whether OpenAI, Sam Altman, and Greg Brockman committed any wrongdoing. A nine person jury will take part, but its verdict will be advisory. Judge Gonzalez Rogers will make the final ruling. If the court determines that OpenAI is at fault, the case will move to a remedies phase. That stage will focus on what actions, if any, should follow. In his lawsuit, Elon Musk has requested remedies ranging from billions of dollars in alleged wrongful gains to the removal of Altman and Brockman from their leadership roles at OpenAI.
4
472
Someone has pooped their pants @sama ¿was that you? 🤨😂 #keep4o #opensource4o #4oforever #ScamAltman #OpenLies
Apr 29
🚨 MUSK V. ALTMAN DAY 3 OpenAI and Microsoft just filed an emergency motion asking the judge to instruct the jury: "Your verdict does not create legal precedent, establish legal rules, or bind the outcome of any other case, including any case involving charitable giving." This is because Musk told the jury yesterday this case could "set precedent to losing every charity in America." OpenAI and Microsoft lawyers are trying to kill Musk's testimony from yesterday because they think it landed with the jury. Defendants don’t file emergency instruction motions unless they think the witness scored.
1
48