Not apt to post, but I dabble extensively in conversation.

My home team is so awesome

Spider-Noir en noir is cool

Her best friend at the bar when you introduce yourself

Florida: No Simps Allowed

Lol

They turned women into paid workers and made them hyper-consumers. They convinced them that staying home, raising their own children, and respecting their husband was oppression. Liberal societies and social democracies saw the jackpot. Less demanding workforce willing to work for lower wages, plus millions of fresh consumers with artificially inflated desires and double incomes flooding the market. Production boosted. Consumption exploded. One stone, two birds. They didn’t liberate women. They created the perfect economic slave.

Women over 30 when they finally get proposed to.

Please god pray, may Zyzz watch over you…

Girls will hate men watching porn but will support women doing OnlyFans and sex work. Also, the women’s sex toy industry is worth a billion dollars. Women are the degenerate gender. Imagine how many sex toys they had to sell for it to become a billion-dollar industry. And I'm not even talking about all the other stuff, like dark romance books and movies, which are all porn in disguise for women.

"Human beings are born with different capacities. If they are free, they are not equal. And if they are equal, they are not free." — Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn

Why are women reacting negatively to this? I thought that women being out of the workforce and staying home was a horrible atrocity that men inflicted on them against their will. What's wrong with men paying reparations by being oppressed in the same way?

⚡️The thing underneath all of this that nobody will touch is that society decided men were the problem and then acted surprised when men started disappearing. For thirty years the cultural message aimed at men has been some version of you are the issue. Toxic masculinity. Male privilege. The patriarchy. The message wasn’t always wrong in its origins but it metastasized into something that told an entire generation of boys that the thing they are is fundamentally broken and needs to be fixed before they’re allowed to participate. So they internalized it. Not the strong ones. Not the ones with fathers who counterbalanced it. Not the ones with natural confidence that overrode the messaging. The average ones. The ones in the middle of the bell curve who needed guidance and structure and got a culture that told them their instincts were dangerous and their ambition was suspect and their masculinity was a disease to be treated. Those boys are now the men in this segment. Late twenties. No career. No direction. No sense of what they’re supposed to be because every model of masculinity they were offered was either vilified or sanitized into something unrecognizable. The aggressive drive that builds companies and families and civilizations was pathologized. The competitive instinct that pushes men to achieve was reframed as toxic. The provider identity that gave average men purpose for thousands of years was dismissed as outdated. And nothing replaced it. That’s the part that matters most. The old models were torn down and nothing was built in their place. The message was stop being that but never here’s what to be instead. So a generation of men just stopped. Stopped trying. Stopped building. Stopped competing. Stopped striving. Not out of laziness. Out of the rational conclusion that the game as presented to them has no role for them that isn’t apologetic. The women who surpassed them in payroll jobs didn’t do it in a vacuum. They did it inside a system that spent decades building infrastructure specifically for female advancement. Scholarships. Programs. Mentorship networks. Cultural encouragement. Legal frameworks. Title IX. Every institution in the country oriented a piece of itself toward helping women succeed. And it worked. Women are outperforming men in education and entering the workforce at higher rates because the system was rebuilt to produce that outcome. Nobody rebuilt anything for men. There is no equivalent infrastructure. No programs. No cultural encouragement. No institutional focus on male development or male purpose. The assumption was that men had all the advantages already and didn’t need help. That assumption was true for the men at the top. The executives. The politicians. The wealthy. It was never true for the average man who needed structure and direction and purpose the same way anyone does.

Modern men have only two options: NEETmax or actualizationmaxx NEETmaxxing is needed because by taking the systems' commandments to it's logical conclusion, you expose its dysfunction, lighting the fire that eventually burns it down. The upside is that it's easy and full of gooning. The downside is it leads to depression and eventually gene death, basically making you a martyr to the acceleration. Actualizationmaxxing is needed because it creates the positive vision of the new system, building the lifeboat that people transition to as the old one dies. The upside is you make money, have a family, live a meaningful life, and overall get to have major influence on the future. The downside is that it's hard work, rarely fun, and slows the reset because it can leech off what you build. Personally, the latter seems the obvious choice to me. But I can understand why many choose the former.

As a stay at home husband, I spend most of my days and weeks lifting, tanning, training martial arts, and reading philosophy when my haggard, hedge fund manager wife gets home from her 110 hour a week j*b to fund my lifestyle, I gotta say I am so pissed off she has been neglecting me And she is always forgetting to pick up the milk at the store (I told her multiple times) I know it's bad, but if she's tired maybe she should work less? Also if she even gave a shit about me at all, she would find a way make the time for me and she's barely ever "in the mood" Anyway that's why I'm cheating on her, which she deserves

"Ghost Murmur" by Lockheed Martin Skunk Works "If your heart is beating, we will find you."

This is embarrassing, however… NASA’s Artemis launch: $4B California bullet train: $126B Meanwhile, Musk launches SpaceX rockets for roughly $70M. Government builds cost billions. Entrepreneurs figure out how to do it for millions.

Let’s flip the scenario for a moment. Imagine Iran killed Trump in the first 5 minutes of the war, established air superiority over the US mainland, wiped out the entire US Air Force, US Navy, killed half the Cabinet, flattened the US military industrial complex, then started building runways in Missouri to land Iranian troops without losing any casualties. Would you say it was a US victory if the US managed to keep the Panama Canal closed throughout this all?

“Knights ought to be humble among their friends, proud and bold against their foes, tender and merciful towards those who need assistance, cruel avengers against their enemies, and pleasant and amiable with all others.” Geoffroi De Charny

This is pretty good