Creative brandable domains for startups or rebranding.

Joined January 2019
142 Photos and videos
Pinned Tweet
13 Oct 2025
Super rare domain: inc.tax Is available for offers: epicname.com/name/inc.tax #domains #finance #taxaudit
2
7
306
EpicName retweeted
Mar 31
ABM just dropped one of the most valuable pieces of knowledge that has ever been shared in the domain industry, and most people are going to miss it because it was a reply to a reply. In August of last year I did a pretty lengthy post breaking down the realities of the aftermarket, trying to help people understand what percentage of sales come directly from "for sale" landing pages, what percentage come from distribution networks, and of the network sales which come from each major distribution partner. The reason I did that was to show the math on what happens if you list at Afternic and use their landers, versus using other landers with discounted commissions. What I essentially proved was that even if the alt lander has a 0% commission, you still end up worse off due to Afternic's commission penalty for not using their landers. I'll link to that post in the replies if you want to do a deep dive and really understand the full picture. But in short, around 60-65% of domain sales come from Afternic DLS and Sedo MLS (the distribution networks), and the remaining 35-40% come from the "for sale" landers directly. This is confirmed by multiple large portfolio holders. There were still two important questions that I was unable to answer though: The first is what would happen if you fully delisted from Afternic, so they couldn't sell your domains at the 25-30% punitive rate while using alt landers. The theory a lot of people shared was that the network buyers, not being able to find you on the network, would still find you by typing in the domain. I wasn't buying it. Sure, it'll happen sometimes, but I was almost certain it would be an extreme minority, and the move would be a major net negative. My theory was that a vast majority of network buyers were either shown your domain as an alternative to what they were actually searching, or when brainstorming a bunch of different domains. And they wouldn't have found it without the network, because they weren't typing domains into their browser's address bar to check availability. They were using a registrar. But I couldn't prove it because I've never fully delisted from Afternic and Sedo to find out, and I didn't know anyone who has and then talked about it. Until now. Thanks to ABM we now have that missing piece of the puzzle; he said sales dropped 50% by delisting. That means if his sales breakdown was 40% landers 60% network, only 17% of network buyers would buy directly if it wasn't on the network. Or if his breakdown was 35% landers and 65% network, only 23% would buy directly if it wasn't on the network. Let that sink in. Between 77% and 83% of network buyers will NOT buy your domain directly from your discount-commission landers if you are not on the distribution networks. If you scroll up on ABM's reply below, you'll see it was a reply to a comment I made predicting this "50% drop" outcome pretty much on the nose. The second looming question is what would happen if you raised your prices on Afternic and Sedo to offset the higher commissions and then used your own landers with low or no commissions offering the domain at a lower price. A lot of people think this is "free money" for network sales by baking in the commission. But I know that it will, for the most part, hurt your sell-through rate quite a bit. I can't quantify it, but I suspect it would almost definitely more than offset the commission penalties you were hoping to recoup. It just seems logical, if you hurt your STR on 65% of your sales to get a slightly better commission on 35% of your sales, you're probably going to lose. Except in the situation where most of your domains are priced below $2k; at that level you can raise prices without affecting the demand curve. I selfishly hope ABM will test this next by relisting at Afternic and Sedo, but at higher prices than shown on his NamePros Landers; enough that he would net the same wherever it sells. That would answer the last remaining question surrounding the economics of the domain aftermarket: is it even possible to offset a commission by raising prices? My money is on "no". But once we know that, we'd be able to fully model out all possible outcomes and make perfectly informed decisions to maximize revenue based on all the various marketplace commission structures and "for sale" lander options. Regardless, I hope ABM stops this delisting experiment for both his and Jamie's sake. It's already been running long enough to learn everything there is to learn from it. It's painfully obvious that a 50% drop in sales to save 15-20% on commission isn't a winning move. Let's say he was doing $1 million in sales a year and netting $800k after commission. Now he would have about $500k in sales, netting maybe $480k after transaction costs. That means he probably spent around $320k to learn this lesson. We all owe ABM an enormous debt of gratitude for generously sharing what he learned with everyone.
Replying to @NameBio
Your guess is correct. Around 50% of the sales have been dropped.
19
19
136
6,967
EpicName retweeted
@GoDaddy cannot get any crazier than this. The top line of the image below is GoDaddy's AI "Suggested Pricing" for our Wednesday.com. IMO, it's accurate. However, below it is their GoValue appraisal, which is what the PUBLIC sees. This is self-sabotage of the highest order. Shout out to @DomainOrca for spotlighting it. @afternic
8
4
54
3,827
EpicName retweeted
Decided this year I would be a little more active and share some sales and acquisitions from time to time. First sale of the year: Domain: Aivi (.) com Hold time: 8 years Venue: @afternic (no boost) Sale: $98,500 (BIN) Wishing all a prosperous and healthy New Year šŸ™ #domains #domainsales
86
33
321
9,880
EpicName retweeted
29 Dec 2025
Just analyzed root words that drove the most sales in 2025 on Atom.com. Beyond volume alone, average selling price is a useful signal of where buyer appetite is strongest. AI, pay, and fund show the most pricing power.
27
27
201
8,236
EpicName retweeted
Most domain investors obsess over STR like it’s the ultimate badge of honor. Truth: High STR can be pure ego if you’re underpricing everything. The metric pros actually respect? Revenue Per Domain (RPD). Mine is $172 this year. Why RPD > STR (and why it’s safe to share): 🧵
9
12
76
3,907
EpicName retweeted
šŸ™Grateful to God, Dadaji, Family, and Friends šŸ™ ✨ Giving Back to the Community with the Full Journey of HealthStrategy .com — From a $3K Acquisition to a $100K Sale in 18 Months Earlier this week, I promised the domain investment community that I would share the complete background story behind one of my six-figure sales — not just a highlight or price tag, but the full journey, the key turning points, the negotiation psychology, and lessons learned from start to finish. True to that promise, here’s a step-by-step breakdown of my sale of HealthStrategy .com, a domain I acquired for ~$3,000, and sold for $100,000 within 18 months. This is more than just a sale recap — it’s an open-book look into how I approach domain investing, how I price and position premium assets, how I handle negotiations, and how I stay grounded through it all. I hope this deep dive adds value to the community — whether you're new to domain investing or a seasoned player seeking long-term consistency. Let’s begin... šŸ‘‡
217
97
629
41,555
EpicName retweeted
13 Dec 2025
Maintain a list of check boxes Green Check boxes for reasons to buy: TLDs taken, Word combination, root word strength, brand word strength, user depth, user breadth, potential buyers, SLD TLD synergy, Industry Synergy and so on etc Red Boxes for reasons to not buy: Mostly how absurd the name is, as most names are. And when you start out buying names, it should check as many green boxes as possible and as few red boxes are possible It is a limited pool of names and competitive but it is what it is As you gain more expertise, you slowly adjust the number of red and green checks to balance scale and growth
9
12
91
3,214
EpicName retweeted
I can finally reveal the name involved in this deal. AiReviews .com Now listen close. Most domainers would’ve flipped it for a quick thousand. I don’t play that game. It’s not about the domain. It’s not about the price. It’s about the DEAL you create. If you’re happy flipping mobile homes, have at it. But if you want real wealth, you slow down and think!
Just closed a LTO deal on a domain I bought in 2021 for $480 Sale price: $1,340,250 LTO: $228K over 5 yrs Balloon: $1,112,250 Equity: 9% Full indemnification $480 → $1.34M equity. That’s how you structure an LTO deal Domains are the greatest asset class ever created!
76
27
264
20,379
16 Nov 2025
TextToVideo.com This gem is available for offers: epicname.com/name/TextToVide…

63
EpicName retweeted
14 Nov 2025
If you’re seeing a slowdown in domain sales, it may have nothing to do with pricing or exposure. The buyer demand curve has shifted, and you can feel it in the data. šŸ§µšŸ‘‡
11
12
96
5,330
12 Nov 2025
One possible solution to non paid auctions: Remove all fake bids from fake winner, extend the auction from the last legit bid for another 3 days. This way you ensure fairness to all bidders involved. @Dynadot
Dynadot turned a fixable mistake into a virtual crime scene; fingerprints of bad faith all over the bidding, evidence of negligence in plain view, and even a CEO who publicly admitted the very policy that caused it. The smoking gun: ā€œIn this case, if we had removed all the bids of the high bidder, the auction would have closed at 12k instead of 30k. That didn’t seem reflective of the market value, or seem fair to the 22 other bidders. So we decided to allow the domain to re-auction, as per our usual policy.ā€ @Dynadot CEO That statement says it all. They acknowledged knowing the bids were invalid and still left them in the record because the result ā€œdidn’t seem reflective of market value.ā€ That’s not fairness, that’s manipulation of the ledger, and it undermines every honest bidder on the platform. Here’s what happens when a disputed, contaminated asset is sold anyway: • Civil exposure under UCC § 2-328(4); honest bidders can void the sale or demand the asset at the last good-faith bid. • Fraudulent-misrepresentation and unjust-enrichment claims; courts can unwind deals and order disgorgement of profits. • Punitive damages when bad faith or recklessness is proven. • Courts can impose a constructive trust or freeze proceeds if the name is flipped for profit. • Emergency relief (TRO / injunction) can halt everything fast once filed. • Regulatory and law-enforcement attention; deceptive practices invite scrutiny. • Reputation fallout; it won’t read as ā€œpolicy.ā€ It will read as ā€œcover-up.ā€ • Buyer risk; if the sale is tainted, the buyer can lose both the domain and the money. Counsel has been retained and every record preserved. This isn’t a joke or fun, it’s exposure. Letting this sale proceed would multiply the damage for everyone involved. Do the right thing @dynatodd . Preserve the evidence. Halt the transfer. Fix the ledger. If not, the fallout will write itself. We’ll see if trying to screw me for $21,000 ends up backfiring and costing them something much more valuable… something they can’t fix. šŸ‘‘ How much is integrity worth? How much is integrity worth? For @Dynadot, I guess it’s exactly $21,000. Unless this is just the tip of the iceberg. šŸ‘‘ And time’s almost up. I sign documents tomorrow at 3 PM. After that, it’s completely out of my hands. šŸ‘‘ #Dynadot #CoinBook #UCC #Accountability #Domains
6
9
2,174
28 Oct 2025
šŸ’”Domaining tip: Before acquiring any new domain (from auctions, closeouts, expired lists..etc) do this simple task: āœ… Search for the name in Google, Crunchbase, Open Corporates. āœ… If no one uses the name then don't buy it! It is as simple as that.
1
3
129
EpicName retweeted
27 Oct 2025
Each new partnership brings us closer to what's possible🌱
27 Oct 2025
We're rapidly expanding our distribution and global reach, now in China šŸ‡ØšŸ‡³ through a new partnership with SeaArea. Their team will showcase Atom Premium Domains to local buyers, and our listings are live here: seaarea.com/agent/ More partnership announcements coming soonšŸŒ
9
4
86
3,827
EpicName retweeted
25 Oct 2025
Can someone explain to me how dropping 500 tone b0mbs on refugee camps was reported as ā€œtargeted strikesā€? Unless civilians were the real target…

94
2,284
4,341
54,645
EpicName retweeted
Make this make sense:
15
6
79
5,957
EpicName retweeted
I have had a full and complete day, and it's only 10 AM here. ā˜‘ļøSorted out which searchers can't see your Afternic .com listings ā˜‘ļøDid quick review of DomainNames marketplace listings ā˜‘ļøDitto for Atom Ultra Premium ā˜‘ļøTold Spaceship how to ease frustrations and save $4.3 million a year ā˜‘ļøAnswered what I like about domaining ā˜‘ļøSuggested an easily implemented solution to make Afternic search user friendly, flawless, and powerful 🤫Some secret stuff I can't tell you, yet.
11
2
67
2,266