If Englishness is now a hereditary members’ club, it is quite something to appoint yourself gatekeeper without the qualifying genetics. It’s giving male gynaecologist energy.
Let’s take this argument to its logical extreme. A woman with no English ancestry whatsoever feels entitled to police Englishness and lecture a man of English descent on what is and isn’t English.
Fine. I’ll play English ancestral privilege game that some on the right seem to believe should exist. Like
@SirSimonClarke, through my maternal lineage, I am biologically English.
@SuellaBraverman is not.
By her own narrow, blood and soil definition of Englishness, and her rejection of the live and let live culture that has developed on these islands over centuries, she might pause before dictating to those who descend from the indigenous people here.
Thank you for your apology.
But English is not the same as British. Just as Scottish and Welsh are different to English- identities determined by background. And it’s not semantics.
I’m not ethnically English; I’m ethnically Asian. And my nationality is British.
Equally if you or I were born in China, we could never be ethnically Chinese.
It’s this casual, anything-goes approach to culture and identity that has led our country to this confused and fractured situation today (a consequence of the orthodoxy of multiculturalism that has prevailed for decades).
And the vague invocation of ‘British values’ has become meaningless because of this casual approach.
We need a much more muscular reassertion of British culture, patriotism and heritage if we are to fix all the problems that the indulgence in multiculturalism has caused.