Trauma Surgeon/Surgical Intensivist #weallhavetodieofsomething he/himbo/homo @UR_Med, @URochesterSurg, @UMNCare alumnus

Joined August 2020
381 Photos and videos
32. Told my mom in July ‘14. She cried, said I was displeasing to god, would die alone, and never have kids. Convo went downhill from there. Eventually, I got annoyed and told her it was her fault I was gay. Pointed out how all of her sons that look like her side are gay 1/2
com que idade e como foi a de vocês?
1
1
278
the ones that look like dad’s side are straight. And two of her sisters each have a lesbian daughter. So clearly it’s genetic and from her side. And if somehow it’s nurture and not nature, she raised me so still her fault. (Never came out to my dad, he was out of the picture)
1
94
I know this is a niche complaint, but one of the things I hate about AI is that if I’m reading a scifi/fantasy novel published in the last 3 years, I wonder if AI wrote it.
126
Pt was alone in preop this week. After we reviewed risks/benefits/possible complications- Me: any questions? Pt: are you someone who prays? Me: not really… Pt: ____ Me: …but I’m happy to be with you while you pray. We held hands while she prayed for a successful surgery.
158
25 Nov 2025
Beyoncé…

ALT Beyonce Hair Flip GIF

25 Nov 2025
Your country has??
1
467
11 Sep 2025
Very Serious People are writing how bad political violence is: “disagree with his politics, he didnt deserve to die!” But the policies he aided and abetted also led to people dying. He’s a victim AND a perpetrator of political violence. I shed no tears for him.
1
1
242
11 Sep 2025
I can mourn that his kids lost their dad. And even that he will never have the chance to evolve into less of an asshole. But do I mourn that someone who encouraged violence and hate is gone? No. #notearsfornazis
193
11 Sep 2025
Charlie Kirk was an advocate for and abettor of political violence.
American rightists have been losing their fucking minds about the Charlie Kirk assassination, bawling their eyes out and babbling about “civil war” and how ready they are to use any amount of violence to crush the “radical left”. The president himself suggested that Kirk was a victim of “radical left political violence” and said he’ll be taking action against groups and individuals who he views as responsible for it. “My Administration will find each and every one of those who contributed to this atrocity and to other political violence, including the organizations that fund it and support it,” Trump said in a speech after the assassination, adding that “radical left political violence has hurt too many innocent people and taken too many lives” and complaining that “those on the radical left have compared wonderful Americans like Charlie to Nazis and the world’s worst mass murderers and criminals.” All this despite the fact that as of this writing there is no evidence whatsoever that Kirk’s killing was motivated by left-wing ideology. The assassin appears to have been able to successfully escape after the killing, so nothing is known about what their motives were. Rightists are braying for civil war and demanding sweeping new authoritarian measures to crush what passes for the political “left” in the United States these days, based on nothing but vibes and feelings. I myself have a hard time believing the narrative that Kirk’s assassin was a blue-haired they/them Antifa ninja who had developed the skills and training necessary to shoot a high-profile individual through the jugular at 200 yards and then execute an elaborate escape plan, and yet chose to use all those abilities to murder some divisive pundit instead of Trump or somebody with real power. That doesn’t make much sense to me. It seems a lot more likely as of this writing that Kirk was assassinated by one of the usual types of sniper assassins — someone whose job is assassinating people, or some weird, fringey right winger (I’m seeing people online say that Kirk was despised by white supremacists). There are all kinds of motives someone can have for assassinating a prominent political operative, and not all of them are ideological or personal. As things stand right now there is no evidence for any of them. I don’t have much else to say on the subject, other than to tie it back in to the genocide in Gaza. Charlie Kirk was an enthusiastic cheerleader and propagandist for the Gaza holocaust, and the right wingers who’ve been talking about how gruesome they find the video of his assassination are accidentally confessing that they haven’t been watching the footage that’s being produced by the mass atrocity they support. If they had, someone getting shot in the throat wouldn’t feel like such a big deal to them. I saw more shocking things today before my morning coffee. The same day Charlie Kirk was killed, at least 72 Palestinians were killed in the genocide he supported. The Palestinians killed in Gaza on that day collectively mattered at least 72 times more than Charlie Kirk, but his death received many orders of magnitude more attention from the mainstream press and from western political discourse. Westerners do not regard Palestinians as fully human. So on this particular day I would like to express my sincere condolences to the families of everyone in Gaza who’ve been massacred by bombs and bullets every single day for the last two years with the facilitation of the US government and cheered on by wealthy Republican pundits. I don’t believe anything positive will be gained by Charlie Kirk’s death; he was a mediocre man who will be easily replaced by the next mediocre man in the right wing punditry pecking order. But he was also a piece of shit, and I’m not going to pretend otherwise just because he’s dead now.
2
589
11 Apr 2025
☠️😵🪦
I’ll never understand transphobic Christians. Was god not the first to look at His son and think he needed more holes?
1
334
14 Mar 2025
Why, in 2025, should anyone be expected to give up their seat on the train based purely on perceived gender? Using a mobility aid or service animal? Definitely. Pregnant? Yes. Elderly? Most likely. Inhabiting an AFAB body? No.
I’m on a train and men are sitting in seats while women stand or sit on the floor. The declining birth rate isn’t a mystery.
1
374
3 Mar 2025
Croissant loaf? You mean the bro-nut?
Upgrade your sandwich game with this amazing CROISSANT LOAF 🎥 natashas_baking | IG
1
222
3 Mar 2025
I make well over the cap, and am already in the highest federal tax bracket. (No kids, no mortgage, work on a W2.) I will WILLINGLY paying more taxes, IF all of the truly wealthy to pay the same rates I do.
reminder that the answer to Social Security is literally just remove the contribution cap there are very few "one neat tricks" in government policy but this is one of them
1
221
27 Feb 2025
I COULD buy myself flowers, but my friends did. So I don’t have to.
2
189
21 Jan 2025
I’m sure Miss Bianca (1 yr old spayed female, 35-40 lb) does this with all of the volunteers, but damn did I need the extra dopamine boost today. #adoptdontshop #MACC #dogrescue
1
7
637
26 Feb 2025
Bianca was adopted 2/1. 🥰
89
25 Feb 2025
I have always struggled with accepting help. So I started asking “what would you do for a friend in this situation?” And accepting the same things from my friends. #therapy #breakthrough #igetby #withalittlehelp #frommyfriends

ALT Beatles Walking GIF

1
150
Dr J retweeted
Sage wisdom from two experienced legal aid attorneys. In any interaction with police or law enforcement: “Shut the f*ck up.”
136
8,166
38,358
1,118,676
23 Feb 2025
like my coffee like I like my men… - dark - strong - full of leche
Replying to @SilverGill47
That’s a new one on me ☕️
1
175
23 Feb 2025
It’s Thin Mint season!! (I’m not a glutton, my friend has diabetes and I need to keep cookies on hand in case his levels are low when he’s at my house.)
101
Dr J retweeted
Why is there always money to bomb people, but never any money to feed, house or care for people?
6,728
57,690
204,943
10,715,612
21 Feb 2025
AT BEST, strategic voting can be a means of trying to ensure more of us survive till the empire faces a reckoning. Voting IS NOT revolutionary.
You don't have to pick a team. You don't have to side with Democrats because Trump is bad. You don't have to side with Trump because Democrats are bad. You don't have to give Trump "credit" for anything. You don't have to give Trump the benefit of the doubt. You don't have to buy into narratives that Trump presents some dangerous new threat that other US presidents did not. You don't have to trust right wing media just because the liberal mainstream media are liars. There's this weird assumption that Americans are under some kind of moral obligation to take a side side either with Trump or with his pretend opposition in the Democratic Party, and it's just silly nonsense. You don't have to, and you should not. The US empire is the single most murderous and corrupt power structure on this planet, by an extremely massive margin. Everyone at the upper echelon of empire management is the sort of person who is willing to facilitate the incomprehensible atrocities and abuses that are necessary for the continuation of that empire. Thinking you need to choose a favorite empire manager is like thinking you need to choose a favorite Nazi. A lucid mind does not look at the turmoil of corruption and psychopathy of the Washington swamp and start calculating which of the vampiric slime beasts are their friend. A lucid mind looks at all the managers of the US-centralized power structure as part of the same enemy. Sure the swamp monsters bicker and contend with one another along various fronts; you'll see that under any power structure. That doesn't mean they're not all devoted to advancing the interests of an empire that feeds on human blood, and it certainly doesn't mean they are your friend. No US president will ever be your friend. No Washington politician, empire manager or oligarch will ever be your friend. Donald Trump is not your friend. Chuck Schumer is not your friend. Elon Musk is not your friend. Hakeem Jeffries is not your friend. Marco Rubio is not your friend. Bernie Sanders is not your friend. JD Vance is not your friend. AOC is not your friend. RFK Jr is not your friend. Elizabeth Warren is not your friend. Tulsi Gabbard is not your friend. Joe Biden is not your friend. These people have some differences, but what they all have in common is that they have all knowingly made careers out of serving the interests of a globe-spanning empire that can only be maintained by nonstop tyranny, abuse, and murder. That one quality rules them out as anyone you should side with, sympathize with, or support. The only reason this isn't immediately obvious to everyone is that the entire western world is marinating in a highly controlled information ecosystem where such obvious facts are hidden from our perception. Whenever I talk about how everyone in Washington is a corrupt monster I get called negative or "blackpilled", but nothing could be further from the truth. I have plenty of hope for positive outcomes for our world, I'm just not delusional enough to believe those outcomes will ever come from the heart of the power structure most responsible for our world's problems. I have plenty of hope in humanity as a collective. Plenty of hope in the real revolutionary movements of the global south. Plenty of hope in the possibilities that could potentially open up with the rise of a multipolar world. I just have no hope in the one power structure on earth nobody should ever place any hope in, in the same way nobody should look to a rapist currently committing rape for solutions on how to curb sexual assault. They are the problem. They are what needs to be fought. Real solutions will begin emerging as soon as there is sufficiently widespread understanding of our problem. Our task — and it is a difficult one — is to punch through the propaganda matrix of imperial narrative control by circulating as much true information as we can about our world, our rulers, their abuses, and their lies. In this way we can start opening eyes to the reality of our situation and begin organizing together to effect real change using the power of our numbers. Is that easy? No. Is it harder than casting a vote for your preferred presidential candidate? Yes. But unlike voting and cheerleading for your favorite swamp monster, it stands a chance of actually bringing positive change to our world.
1
144