Foundations of Cooperative AI Lab @CarnegieMellon. Creating foundations of game theory for advanced AI w/ focus on achieving cooperation. Directed by @conitzer.

Joined January 2022
Photos and videos
New positions at FOCAL! cs.cmu.edu/~focal/index.html

We are recruiting postdocs at the Foundations of Cooperative AI Lab (@FOCAL_lab) at @CarnegieMellon (cmu.edu)! Please retweet / share / send great applicants our way! For different positions please reach out. @SCSatCMU @CSDatCMU @mldcmu apply.interfolio.com/136899
744
Foundations of Cooperative AI Lab (FOCAL) at CMU retweeted
One of my open math problems apparently got resolved by ChatGPT 5.5 Pro (Ryan O'Donnell prompted it better than I did!), though the proof was so hard for me to read that it seemed easier to just prove it myself. More thoughts on implications for math here: aifails.substack.com/p/even-…

10
20
152
17,192
Foundations of Cooperative AI Lab (FOCAL) at CMU retweeted
Replying to @FOCAL_lab
@FOCAL_lab member @EmanuelTewolde is presenting his CoopEval work at EPFL on Monday (14:30) and it will be on zoom! (paper link in comment) memento.epfl.ch/event/ai-cen…

1
2
3
99
Foundations of Cooperative AI Lab (FOCAL) at CMU retweeted
(1/4) Can remembering more of the past make AI agents less cooperative? In our new paper, we study LLM agents in repeated social dilemmas. The key variable is not how many rounds they play, but how much prior interaction history they can access when making each decision.
1
3
9
626
Foundations of Cooperative AI Lab (FOCAL) at CMU retweeted
(2/4) Surprisingly, longer recall often degrades cooperation. Across 7 LLMs and 4 repeated social dilemma games, agents with longer histories often shift away from forward-looking cooperation and toward retrospective grievance-tracking.
1
2
3
547
Foundations of Cooperative AI Lab (FOCAL) at CMU retweeted
(3/4) The mechanism is not just “too much context.” It is what the agents remember: replacing histories with synthetic cooperative records restores cooperation, and ablating explicit CoT reasoning often reduces the collapse. We call this the memory curse.
1
2
5
475
Foundations of Cooperative AI Lab (FOCAL) at CMU retweeted
(3/3) Also, I don't understand how some people think AGI is just around the corner but the risks are easily manageable! Of course their positions may not be captured accurately here.
1
1
180
Foundations of Cooperative AI Lab (FOCAL) at CMU retweeted
(2/3) I'm sure we all have thoughts on our descriptions -- I certainly worry about many other AI risks current and future in addition to scaled misinformation, and I actually think the world is too focused on LLMs-as-chatbots -- but still impressive.
1
1
2
195
Foundations of Cooperative AI Lab (FOCAL) at CMU retweeted
(1/3) Wow, I (and many friends) made it onto this "Mapping AI" map! Does anyone know the methodology? Who is behind it? mapping-ai.org/map
1
1
2
376
Foundations of Cooperative AI Lab (FOCAL) at CMU retweeted
(3/3) You can play with interleaving tokens yourself here! (... works better with better models...) cs.cmu.edu/~focal/alternatin…

1
2
4
404
Foundations of Cooperative AI Lab (FOCAL) at CMU retweeted
(2/3) We've also been interested in interleaving tokens for philosophical reasons. This chapter based on a talk I gave at a Duke conference about tests of consciousness discusses how coherent LLM text doesn't necessarily come from any clear unit entity. cs.cmu.edu/~conitzer/LLMcons…

1
3
4
433
Foundations of Cooperative AI Lab (FOCAL) at CMU retweeted
(1/3) In this new paper led by Jiayuan Liu, we show that interleaving tokens from multiple LLMs can be (somewhat) robust, even when a *majority* of the LLMs are corrupted (unlike if they all vote over tokens)! arxiv.org/abs/2604.17139
1
6
30
4,551
Foundations of Cooperative AI Lab (FOCAL) at CMU retweeted
After about a year of work, I defended my MSCS thesis at CMU: Title: The Structure of Deception: How LLM Agents Lie, Break Promises, and Exploit Trust in Multi-Agent Settings Core claim: LLM deception in multi-agent settings isn't one phenomenon. It's a family of structurally distinct failure modes, each shaped by different features of the interaction. Some look like premeditated false commitments. Others look like strategic silence that message-level classifiers can't see at all. Aggregate lying rates hide this, and current monitoring approaches each fail against different parts of it. I would like to deeply thank to my advisors @conitzer and @ZhijingJin, @AdtRaghunathan for being part of the committee, and everyone in the @JinesisLab for all their time and effort shaping this work. Recording: youtu.be/Z3Q9AkriPxg @MPI_IS @ELLISforEurope @UofTCompSci @VectorInst @TorontoSRI @CIFAR_News @JinesisLab @EuroSafeAI @ELLISInst_Tue @CarnegieMellon @SCSatCMU #AIAgents #AISafety #MultiAgentAI
1
6
45
6,149
Foundations of Cooperative AI Lab (FOCAL) at CMU retweeted
(4/4) Emin Berker is presenting (on Saturday at this time) "Designing Rules to Pick a Rule: Aggregation by Consistency" (an unusual approach to social choice where we let the choice of rule depend on the input (!)) arxiv.org/abs/2508.17177
2
2
142
Foundations of Cooperative AI Lab (FOCAL) at CMU retweeted
(3/4) Ioannis Anagnostides (maybe with help from Emanuel Tewolde) is presenting (right now!) "Convergence of Regret Matching in Potential Games and Constrained Optimization" (studying the properties of regret matching beyond zero-sum games) arxiv.org/abs/2510.17067
1
2
2
202
Foundations of Cooperative AI Lab (FOCAL) at CMU retweeted
(2/4) Cyrus Cousins is presenting (right now!) "Towards Cognitively-Faithful Decision-Making Models to Improve AI Alignment" (arguing for the importance of ensuring that models learned from people's decisions align with their cognitive processes) arxiv.org/abs/2509.04445
1
2
2
129
Foundations of Cooperative AI Lab (FOCAL) at CMU retweeted
(1/4) Three papers with authors from our Foundations of Cooperative AI Lab at ICLR!
1
3
7
472