Joined May 2014
1,665 Photos and videos
I am bearish which is bullish 🙃
1
1
379
This is so called: Bull extinction event 👀
🚨 BREAKING 🇯🇵 JAPAN WILL HIKE RATES TO 1.00% TOMORROW AT 11 PM ET, FOR THE FIRST TIME IN 31 YEARS! ODDS ON PREDICTION MARKETS ARE NOW AT 99%. HISTORICALLY, EVERY RATE HIKE IN JAPAN HAS BEEN FOLLOWED BY A 20% DUMP IN $BTC. THIS WOULD BE REALLY BAD FOR MARKETS...
62
FomoMoonKey ∞/28.7B 𐤊 retweeted
$KAS is everything what Bitcoin was supposed to be.
12
45
301
3,775
Exactly my take. What are the chances? 🫶
Calling it now
53
FomoMoonKey ∞/28.7B 𐤊 retweeted
Smart money positioning for rate cuts not rate hikes.
42
102
888
93,812
FomoMoonKey ∞/28.7B 𐤊 retweeted
152
2,137
9,176
639,227
FomoMoonKey ∞/28.7B 𐤊 retweeted
Jun 12
bro makes billionaires look poor
234
1,243
28,525
927,720
FomoMoonKey ∞/28.7B 𐤊 retweeted
Tesla FSD 14.3.4 rolling out now
5,558
9,554
78,203
9,659,008
FomoMoonKey ∞/28.7B 𐤊 retweeted
Time will tell Study kaspa $KAS
7
55
288
5,364
FomoMoonKey ∞/28.7B 𐤊 retweeted
SpaceX starts trading this Friday. Here's what history says happens next. This is the post-IPO performance of every major tech listing of the last decade. Every name you know. Every name you use. Look at the last column: maximum drawdown in year one. – Facebook: -54% – Snap: -56% – Uber: -68% – Pinterest: -70% – Lyft: -79% – Rivian: -88% – Robinhood: -90% Median first-year drawdown across the entire list: -54%. Average: -55%. Not the speculative junk. The whole class. Including the eventual winners. Zoom eventually rose 142% in year one. It still drew down 40% along the way. Palantir gained 153%. It still fell 53% at one point. CrowdStrike, Datadog, MongoDB. All ended year one higher. All put their holders through a 40 to 67% drawdown first. There has not been a single major tech IPO in a decade that didn't hand you a brutal drawdown in the first twelve months. Not one. Now SpaceX joins the list, at the richest valuation in IPO history. You don't have to buy it today. The IPO is the seller's moment, not the buyer's. Wait for the base.
92
247
956
148,975
Correct take :) This is why I follow the @Barchart 😎
Imagine trying to take out bank loans to buy now 🤦‍♂️
29
I died 🤣 Why? One thing they forgot to mention is: 4,000 new millionaires out of the people who invested in closed rounds and Angel rounds, who will now get the exit liquidity on the IPO day. Others will need to wait at least 4 years to make any money at all 🤣
BREAKING: SpaceX's IPO is expected to create 4,000 new millionaires, including some cafeteria workers whose compensation packages include employee stock options, per Bloomberg.
58
My prediction for $KAS in the coming months :) WDYT @BTCBreadMan @skibumtrading 🙃
1
58
FomoMoonKey ∞/28.7B 𐤊 retweeted
The Golden Age is real in Poland!! 🇵🇱 And the streets are clean & safe!
15
15
238
10,590
FomoMoonKey ∞/28.7B 𐤊 retweeted
since many (~4) asked me about the zcash bug - - - earlier this year I had this convo with a zcash core dev: zk: it's weird that kaspa is pruning past records me: why does it need to keep 'em? zk: the whole point of ledgers is to prove correctness of all state transitions me: the whole point of ledgers is to provide focal points for the consensus state zk: the whole point... me: hmm then why did you come work in zcash? you know the Sprout->Sapling counterfeiting bug zk: Turnstile guarantees that the counterfeit could have been very limited me: true but you still cannot prove or even reason about correct state transitions besides the total supply cap zk: that's actually a good point ---- the most hardcore cryptography coin is shifting away from correctness proofs to practical-enough proofs. I believe this is a step in the right practical direction, yet the paradigm shift should not go unnoticed - -cryptography is giving way to consensus. if you came to zcash for cryptographic integrity, reconsider. there are many good reasons to root for zcash prospering. zcash is serving a more important role than bitcoin, whose utility for the original mission is by now blurry. cryptographic integrity is/should not be one of those reasons. ---- BTW the bug should definitely have been exploited. I don't know the personal values of Taylor Hornby, and I shouldn't be required to make the effort to learn them. I only know that if I found such an exploit, it wouldn't take me more than a few minutes to tempt myself into printing a longint amount of ZEC and deciding later what to do with it. I wouldn't necessarily use it to exit the pool immediately and corrupt the supply, I'd wait to see if some portion of the broken pool does not seem to migrate on time (probably lost funds), in which case I would not think twice before claiming the funds myself. you could argue that no harm done, and you might be right, but then again you are here -- in zcash / in crypto -- for its consensus dynamics, the ability to coordinate interests and convictions across different trust zones around some shared asset; not for some pristine mathematical integrity.
55
275
891
30,349
Accumulate $LINK at $7 - $10 Your future self will thank you
1
28
OG @hus_qy is one of the best things that happened to $KAS :) People were not bullish enough when he joined the team
🚨 Just one word. "Sure." A Kaspa community member asked if David Gokhshtein would join a conversation with Hans Moog. Hans replied: "If he wants to talk about Kaspa, I'm definitely in. We're building something really awesome." David's response? 👉 Sure. When one of crypto's largest influencers is open to hearing the Kaspa story, people should pay attention. ⚡ 10 BPS live ⚡ Toccata hard fork approaching ⚡ Native smart contracts on the horizon ⚡ One of the most passionate communities in crypto This isn't hype. This is what happens when the tech becomes impossible to ignore. #Kaspa #Crypto #Bitcoin #BlockDAG
100
YES :)
Bitcoin WYCKOFF ACCUMULATION PROGRESS ▰▰▰▰▰▱▱▱▱▱ 50%
1
25
This is correct, take :) They also never say how much Poland paid to the EU in direct membership contributions, interest payments and obligations. Every penny "poured" into Poland comes with a % interest charged by Deutsche Bank 🙃
Everyone repeats the "EU poured money into Poland" line like it ends the argument. Worth asking where a lot of that money went, and what Poland gave up to get it. Start with the funds. Brussels pays for a Polish motorway and the contract gets won by a German or Austrian firm, the machines come from Germany, the consultants bill from Frankfurt. That's not a conspiracy, it's in the EU's own research: contracts in Central Europe routinely go to firms from the countries that "donated" the money. A chunk of it does a lap through Poland and heads back west. Then the part sold as generosity. Most of what gets called Europe investing in Poland was Western firms chasing cheaper labour. The border opened and German and French companies moved production east. That's arbitrage (not aid). They cut their costs, Poland got the jobs, and the brands and the profits stayed west. What they didn't build here they bought: the biggest grocery chain in Poland is Portuguese, Warsaw's power grid is German-owned. Now watch the same rulebook in German hands. UniCredit owned Bank Pekao, one of Poland's biggest banks, for 18 years and nobody in Brussels blinked. The moment that same Italian bank reached for Commerzbank, Berlin called it a hostile attack and the government dug in to stop it. An Italian buying a Polish bank is just the market working. An Italian buying a German one is a national emergency. Same single market. The rules get written for everyone and enforced on the small. The money helped, no argument. But the EU didn't build Poland, the Poles running their own firms did, the same firms now selling more to Germany than they buy from it. Brussels gave them a market to sell into, nothing more. Follow the invoices and the savior story falls apart.
28
Gold cycles so far: 1970 -> 1980 🐂 1980 -> 2001 🐻 2001 -> 2011🐂 2011 -> 2015🐻 2015 -> 2025🐂 Patterns are not guaranteed, but we just finished the 4th 10-year bull run on Gold, which finished with a Silver rotation (for the 4th time as well)
1
27