What does John Healeyās resignation mean for the military?
More delay. More uncertainty. More difficulty in getting the kit Armed Forces personnel so desperately need.
The Defence Investment Plan has been written up since January. The financial plan for it was only revealed on Monday to the former Defence Secretary.
Put simply, it wasnāt nearly enough. The Treasury (and the Chancellor) has refused to fund it to the levels needed.
This will almost certainly result in projects being cancelled or delayed. And that, in turn, will almost certainly result in the taxpayer paying the price.
Priorities will be hacked back to fund essential projects; work for British industry will be cut through procurement slowdowns, meaning some companies may not be able to weather the drought of financial investment.
Companies based in Britain may consider moving abroad because of the financial uncertainty, damaging the countryās defence industry.
This is a debacle two decades in the making but coming home to roost now. Labour had a chance to try and fix it, to try and show Britain can increase its defences. It has so far failed, miserably.
Cuts will need to be made. Training, critical to keeping troopsā war-fighting edge sharp, may be cancelled for some units to save money.
Ministers repeatedly said were working āflat outā on finishing the DIP. If thatās true, how was financial statement for the investment plan only revealed to the former defence secretary Monday afternoon?
This is an embarrassing situation for Britain and a pathetic display of leadership by Starmer. As several military figures told me today, the only person this debacle benefits is Putin. āHeāll be rubbing his hands in glee,ā one person said.
Itās hard not to agree with thatā¦