This post from the
@metpoliceuk is frankly embarrassing and I’m genuinely surprised it’s still up.
Let me break this down per the law:
In the UK, when people are asked to disclose religion, sexual orientation, or gender identity, there is always an opt-out. That safeguard exists to prevent prejudice and coercion.
Yet here we have the police publicly singling out a lawful, registered charitable organisation and treating membership as something that must be declared. Whatever anyone’s personal views are, that is not how fair policing works.
If the
@metpoliceuk have concerns about the Freemasons, the answer is simple: investigate specific allegations against specific individuals. That is their job.
What you don’t do is scaremonger the public, blur lawful association with suspicion, and create division, especially when there are far more serious and pressing issues the police should be dealing with.
This approach doesn’t demonstrate strength or transparency. It raises serious questions about judgment, priorities, and competence.
#metpolice
We will robustly defend our decision to require officers and staff to declare if they are Freemasons.
Our response to the decision by the Grand Lodge of England to seek an injunction blocking the implementation of the policy is below.