A new WHO climate report exaggerates heat deaths while hiding that cold deaths have fallen by roughly 250× more than heat deaths have risen. That’s not science — it’s the suppression of inconvenient data to manufacture a crisis. wsj.com/opinion/global-warmi… archive.ph/EEW9U

Russia has never attacked the EU. Not once. Since the Berlin Wall fell in 1989, we had peace. Russia sold us cheap gas, traded honestly, and stayed a calm neighbor. No threats. No invasions. Then Washington’s neocons and London smelled blood. They tried to loot Russia in the chaotic 90s with shock therapy and oligarchs. When that failed, they turned Ukraine a non-NATO, non-EU country into their proxy battlefield to bleed Russia dry. Ordinary Ukrainians? Just collateral. Their lives destroyed for American hegemony, more NATO bases, more expensive US LNG for us, and keeping Europe weak and dependent. Europe was a quiet neighborhood. Russia was the big reliable house next door offering fuel and food. Than the overseas bully says: “Use the neighbor kid’s yard as a battlefield to smash the strong house. Don’t care about the kid we’ll wave flags.” Our spineless EU leaders opened the gates, cheered, and cut our own electricity to “punish” Russia. Now the kid’s yard is ruined, the strong house got tougher, and our neighborhood is paying insane bills. This isn’t defense. It’s suicide for empire dollars. Russia didn’t march west! NATO marched east. We’re sacrificing Ukrainian lives to keep America on top. Europe First. Real energy. Real borders. Real sovereignty. Stop letting foreign neocons play with our continent. Russia isn’t the enemy but blind obedience to Washington is.

Why is it only pushed in the West?

Climate Change is a Scam.

HAMAS: „Wir werden das Massaker vom 7. Oktober wiederholen und wiederholen, eine Million Mal, wenn es nötig ist. Bis wir der Besatzung ein Ende setzen.“ Journalist: „Besatzung von Gaza?“ HAMAS: „Nein, ganz Israel“. Glaubt jemand ernsthaft, dass mit diesen Mördern Frieden möglich ist?

Even Arab leaders admit it. Everyone is sharing the Bill Clinton clip where he describes how Yasser Arafat rejected a generous peace offer at Camp David that would have given the Palestinians a state on 96 percent of the West Bank, land swaps, and a capital in East Jerusalem. Clinton says Arafat lied to him and that the Palestinian leadership never actually wanted a two-state solution. They wanted to destroy Israel. It’s a video often shared by people like @VividProwess, and it’s an important one for people to see. Of course, critics immediately dismiss it. They claim Clinton is biased or he’s pro-Israel. They’ll tell you that you cannot trust the American perspective. Ok, so let us set that aside. Now watch this. In this powerful interview, former Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak, a major Arab leader who was directly involved in negotiations, says exactly the same thing from the Arab side. He talks about the Mena House Conference in Cairo as well as the Camp David negotiations of 1978. All failed because of the Palestinians repeatedly rejecting any offer. The Oslo accords were signed but because Hamas and the Palestinian Islamic Jihad were not involved, they derailed the accords and any chance for peace by initiating 4 years of terrorist suicide attacks in Israel. Then came the second Camp David negotiations in 2000 which Arafat agreed to, then rejected and instead initiated the Second Intifada. Mubarak explains how the Palestinians refused to even participate in the Mena House conference of 1977. He describes repeated opportunities they were given, including a detailed document that called for Israeli withdrawal from the Samaria, Judea and Gaza, security arrangements during a transitional period, and other major concessions. The Israelis were willing to negotiate on difficult issues like who would control security. The Palestinians, according to Mubarak, kept saying no and wasting chance after chance. He speaks with clear frustration about how for decades the Palestinian side has rejected peace initiatives and realistic compromises. The video further shows footage from the PLO representative in 1977, as well as old footage of Egyptian president Sadat who was involved in the Mena House and first Camp David negotiations of 1978. This perhaps is far more impactful than Clinton’s account because it is not a Western or Israeli voice. It is prominent Arab leaders who lived the negotiations, who represented the broader Arab world, and who had zero incentive to defend Israel. When leaders from both sides of the table describe the same pattern of Palestinian rejectionism and violence, it becomes much harder to dismiss as bias. The pattern is clear across decades and across different voices… generous offers, repeated refusals, and continued demands for everything while giving nothing in return. This is not ancient history. It is the core reason the conflict continues today. If you value the truth, please share.

BREAKING NEWS FOR PALESTINIANS! The fact that your great-grandfather lost his house, one dunam of land, three goats, and an olive tree in a war that HE AND HIS FRIENDS STARTED in 1948 does NOT give you the right to rape innocent young women. Follow me for more ethics tips! w.

So, when Ukraine kills Polish farmers, its Russias fault, when Ukraine bombs Lithuania and Latvia, its Russias fault- And when the Drug addict beggars (British directed) sea drone fleet starts blowing up Romanian ports- You guessed it- Russias fault.

Short test: are you an antisemite?

Verstehe ich es richtig, dass Drohnen aus der Ukraine in folgenden NATO-Ländern eingeschlagen sind… - Finnland - Estland - Lettland - Litauen - Rumänien …und uns jedes Mal erzählt wird, dass es sich dabei um eine Aggression Russlands gegen die NATO handle und wir darum bald gegen Russland in den Krieg gehen müssen? Warum eigentlich nicht gegen die Ukraine?

Rupert Sheldrake: "there's a conflict in the heart of science between science as a method of inquiry based on reason, evidence, hypothesis, and collective investigation, and science as a belief system or a world view. And unfortunately, the world view aspect of science has come to inhibit and constrict the free inquiry, which is the very lifeblood of the scientific endeavor."

So the flotilla activists were rightly and justly held by Israel, though for just half a day, then released and deported. And the world went into complete meltdown. Outrage went to delirious levels. Now the same flotilla activists have been detained and imprisoned in Libya for the past 10 days, and that prison term has been extended significantly. And the reaction from the world? Total silence. Not a peep. Weird huh? 🤔

How to manufacture a crisis: A WHO commission wants to declare climate change a “global health emergency.” Their big evidence? Rising heat deaths in Europe. But once you adjust for an ageing society, the “crisis” essentially disappears. Even more dishonestly, the report conceals that cold deaths have declined by approximately 250 times as much as heat deaths have risen. wsj.com/opinion/global-warmi…

Under capitalism, socialists are free to build socialism. Under socialism, capitalists aren’t free to build anything. Nothing stops a group of socialists pooling their money, forming a company, and splitting every wage and every pound of profit perfectly equally.... Or to donate all profit to the government. It’s legal. It’s easy. Owning the means of production is as simple as setting up a company. Marx wrote his manifesto before the invention of limited liability companies. Back then “seize the factory” meant seizing it from the handful of families who could afford one. That argument expired the day anyone could start a company with limited liability, raise investment and hire who they want. Socialists are free to lead by example and demonstrate their system works. They can out-recruit, out-motivate, out-build and out innovate based on their ideas if they like. It would prove the philosophy works. Capitalism will happily host their experiment. The fact that nobody does this tells you a lot.

The October 7th massacre did not end with Hamas. It continued in UN reports. A rigorous review of UN documentation reveals a pattern of systemic bias: laundered data, distorted statistics, the systematic omission of Hamas' conduct - Read the Full Report

Dla wszystkich ukraińskich botów piszących słowo w słowo ten sam bełkot, że po upadku Ukrainy Polska będzie miała granicę z Rosją - mamy granicę z Rosją i nic się tam nie dzieje. To wasz ukraiński problem, że w 2014 roku rozwaliliście sobie swoje oligarchiczne państwo i poszliście w coraz większą rusofobię. Ługańsk, Odessa, Korsuń, Słowiańsk i Mariupol - tam wszędzie polała się w 2014 krew rosyjska i ukraińska z rąk banderowskich bojówek. To było pewne, że w końcu wybuchnie wojna rosyjsko-ukraińska, a tej nigdy nie wygracie. Teraz i my, Polacy musimy ponosić koszty waszej głupoty i kompleksów, także wobec Polaków. Miejmy nadzieję, że nastanie pokój, a diaspora ukraińska masowo wróci na Ukrainę - nową, federalną i bez fanatyków Bandery.

"I STOPPED BELIEVING THE IPCC AFTER CLIMATEGATE (2009). MAN MADE GLOBAL WARMING IS JUST GROUPTHINK, THERE IS NO SCIENTIFIC CONSENSUS ON IT. IT'S POLITICAL: SCIENTISTS ARE "GREEN" ACTIVISTS & LOBBYISTS" - Dr Judith Curry

It’s a racket.

The scientists who wrote the "lab leak is a conspiracy theory" letter? They organized it themselves then told each other they needed "the appearance of independence." Both were paid intel informants. Both worked with the Wuhan lab. One scientist called it genetically engineered. Days later he wrote the opposite. Then got a $9 million grant. No conspiracy required. Just people covering their own tracks.