ESB úthlutaði skattlausum Brusselstörfum til þeirra sem töluðu fyrir hagsmunum þess. Ef við segjum Já hefjast aðlögunarviðræður, og fólkið sem á að gæta hagsmuna okkar verður einmitt það sem ESB mun reyna að múta. Gleðilegan 17. júní 🇮🇸 mbl.is/frettir/innlent/2026/…

What's this? It's only Fatboy Slim joining the anti-fascists against the far right in Brighton 💚

Viðreisn lætur gera könnun. Fyrirsögnin segir „Meirihluti ætlar að segja Já.” Niðurstaðan er að 44,5% vilja “kíkja í pakkann”. Þjóðin er klofin í tvennt um hvort það eigi yfirhöfuð að “kíkja í pakkann”, þó ríkisstjórnin sé búin að vera að selja það sem lítið og saklaust mál. Það er því augljóslega ekki meirihlutavilji fyrir aðild að Evrópusambandinu. Og þetta er árangurinn eftir margra mánaða einhliða markaðssetningu ríkisstjórnarinnar á kostum Evrópusambandsins. Vonandi lítur ríkisstjórnin á þessa könnun sem vísbendingu um vilja þjóðarinnar og fer nú loksins að einbeita sér að þeim málum sem raunverulega skipta landsmenn máli, að draga úr útgjöldum ríkisins og ná þannig tökum á vöxtum og verðbólgu.

Ivan Kaufmann: Þorgerður Katrín sagði að ég ætti að selja Vélfag Íslendingi | Spjallið | S04E34 Ivan Kaufmann hefur verið sakaður um að vera „leppur Rússa“ af íslenskum stjórnvöldum. Í þessu ítarlega viðtali við Frosta Logason segir Kaufmann sína hlið á Vélfagsmálinu í fyrsta sinn af fullum þunga. Kaufmann heldur því fram að íslensk stjórnvöld hafi aldrei sýnt honum nein gögn sem réttlættu aðgerðirnar gegn honum, þrátt fyrir að hann hafi lagt fram umfangsmikil gögn um eignarhald sitt og viðskiptasögu. Í viðtalinu fullyrðir hann að Þorgerður Katrín Gunnarsdóttir hafi látið þau skilaboð berast til hans að hann ætti að selja Vélfag til íslensks aðila. Fáðu þér áskrift og sjáðu alla þætti á Brotkast í fullri lengd inni á brotkast.is/askrift/ @FrostiLoga

A multicultural liberal society can only work for a very brief moment in time, while there’s still a deeper underlying unity that exists from a dominant majority culture that supplies the necessary social cohesion for this liberal utopia to thrive. But liberalism steadily uses up that cohesion while pretending it doesn’t need it. It lives off the pre-liberal social capital of a family structure, national identity, shared religion, and common conceptions of civic duty until it eventually dissolves all of those those things in the name of trying to build the fully autonomous self-actualized universal gender fluid floating bundle of rights that we once called “man” but can no longer assign a gender specific name to because that’s not sufficiently pluralistic. Liberalism dissolves the very world that sustains it, and it replaces that world with a fractured and atomized one that becomes too weak for abstract rights and neutral procedures to hold it together for long. The last thing liberalism dissolves is itself.

If I get stabbed and murdered by a subhuman savage, please use it to push an extreme political agenda – it is my will.

More disturbing details slowly bubble to the surface re Henry Nowak's murder and @HantsPolice complicity. Chief Constable Boon's claim of Henry not surviving regardless of police uselessness was based on the pathology report from Home Office registered Dr Amanda Jeffrey, which is being contested by Dr Krzysztof Magier in the post below. In addition to this, the body-cam audio proves the police were told Henry was in a state of collapse when they arrived and had blood in his mouth. He also had a clearly visible knife-wound to his face according to the judge's summing up (link below). In addition to this, the judge also noted Henry's attempted escape route was visible by the bloodstain trail. Dr Krzysztof Magier claims the dragging and cuffing of Henry likely opened up a partially clotted sliced vein, and had he been taken straight to hospital would have had a 50% chance of survival. Hants Police are complicit in his murder. Not least the thick DEI female officer who eventually called an ambulance but told them the victim was "beat up" rather than stabbed, thereby delaying the response time. Hopefully the truth behind this will slowly emerge. Even more hopefully, manslaughter charges will be bought against these monster police on the scene, and Chief Constable Boon will be sacked in disgrace. Judge's summing up here: judiciary.uk/wp-content/uplo…

🟥 Czy Henry Nowak mógł przeżyć? Dr Krzysztof Magier @DrMagier , lekarz pediatra i były konsul honorowy RP w Cowes, przeanalizował nagrania z policyjnej kamery nasobnej pokazujące śmierć Henry'ego Nowaka. Dr Magier jest lekarzem prowadzącym oddział intensywnej terapii dziecięcej, z doświadczeniem w szkoleniach z medycyny pola walki oraz po specjalistycznym kursie leczenia ciężkich urazów (w tym ran postrzałowych i kłutych). Nie zgadza się z opinią patologa i sędziego, że Henry Nowak nie miał żadnych szans na przeżycie i ze skucie go w kajdanki nic w zasadzie nie zmieniło. Wręcz przeciwnie – istnieje duże prawdopodobieństwo, że to interwencja policji przyczyniła się do jego śmierci. Przeanalizował on raport z sekcji, który wskazuje na uszkodzenie żyły podobojczykowej jako główne źródło krwawienia i tłumaczy, gdzie leży problem. U zdrowej osoby krwawienie żylne odbywa się pod niskim ciśnieniem i często samoogranicza się dzięki powstającemu naturalnie skrzepowi, a samo zbliżenie krawędzi rany i ucisk otaczających tkanek domyka żyłę na tyle, że spowalnia albo nawet zatrzymuje krwawienie. Z nagrania z policyjnej kamery nasobnej wynika, że gdy policja przybyła na miejsce (prawdopodobnie 5-10 minut po zranieniu), Henry był na tyle przytomny, że mówił dość głośno. Nie był zatem jeszcze w stanie terminalnym. Po wykręceniu rąk do tyłu i skuciu za plecami najprawdopodobniej doszło do rozciągnięcia żyły, rozerwania skrzepu i gwałtownego nasilenia krwawienia. W ciągu zaledwie ok. trzech minut stracił przytomność i zmarł. Osoby z podejrzeniem urazów wewnętrznych nigdy nie powinny być gwałtownie przemieszczane ani szarpane – takie działanie może zniszczyć naturalny skrzep i doprowadzić do masywnego krwotoku wewnętrznego. Zamiast natychmiastowego wezwania zespołu ratownictwa medycznego i przekazania pacjenta w ręce ratowników, policja go skuła. Gdyby na miejscu jako pierwsi pojawili się paramedycy, szanse Henry’ego na przeżycie byłyby znacznie większe. "50%" - pisze dr Magier. Ratownicy mogliby szybko założyć kroplówkę, podać płyny zwiększające objętość krwi krążącej oraz kwas traneksamowy stabilizujący skrzep, a w razie potrzeby wykonać dekompresję igłową (wkłucie grubej i długiej igły w płuco), bo problemem nie był tyle brak funkcji płuca, ale ucisk zalanego krwią płuca na serce i śródpiersie, który blokuje krążenie. Co gorsza, incydent miał miejsce zaledwie kilka minut jazdy samochodem (2–3 minuty karetką na sygnale) od Southampton University Hospital – regionalnego Major Trauma Centre dysponującego pełnym zapleczem specjalistów, procedur i sprzętu. "Jestem przekonany, że gdyby Henry dotarł tam żywy, lekarze nie pozwoliliby mu umrzeć" - pisze dr Magier. Podsumowując: agresywna interwencja policji, zamiast ratować życie, doprowadziła do śmierci przez nieodpowiednie postępowanie z ciężko ranionym człowiekiem, mimo że najwyższej klasy opieka była w zasięgu kilku minut. "Obawiam się, że Sędzia i patolog byli zbyt łaskawi dla policji" - pisze dr Magier.

Continuum Ep. 9 | The Open Society The Henry Nowak murder raises the question, how did the West come to treat minority rights and tolerance as more sacred than the lives of its own people? 0:00 Intro 2:35 The shock of the Second World War 3:54 Popper's early life 7:03 Popper as a Jewish intellectual 11:44 Popper's attack on Plato 17:49 Did Socrates love democracy? 21:50 Closed vs. Open societies 26:42 Populism vs. democracy 30:02 Historicism and Hegel 34:11 Nationalism 46:22 Was Popper intellectually lazy? 49:35 The Open Society as uniquely Western 51:47 The huge influence of Popper's work

The Macpherson Report and the murder of Henry Nowak are causally linked through the corrosive logic of multiculturalism and its institutional offspring: two-tier policing. By the time he was stabbed to death in December 2025, 18-year-old Henry Nowak would have been eight years younger than the 1999 Macpherson Report. The nature of the former—and especially the police response—is directly tied to the latter. Sir William Macpherson’s inquiry into the Stephen Lawrence case redefined institutional racism expansively. It instructed police to prioritise perceptions of racism from minority complainants. This well-intentioned reform, born of genuine outrage at one racially motivated murder, embedded a structural bias: complaints from certain communities received swift deference, while the concerns of the native majority were often dismissed as prejudice. Over a quarter-century, this shifted the state’s posture from impartial referee to quasi-imperial active manager of ethnic sensitivities.  Fast-forward to Southampton, 3 December 2025. Henry Nowak, a Polish-British student, was stabbed five times—including a fatal chest wound—by 23-year-old Vickrum Digwa, who was legally carrying a 21cm kirpan, a privilege extended to no others in British society. As Henry lay dying in his own blood, Digwa falsely claimed racial abuse (citing a bruised eye). Officers handcuffed and arrested the victim rather than rendering immediate aid. Police later apologised—unconvincingly, particularly after the leaked bodycam footage emerged. The IOPC is investigating. This is not mere incompetence. It is the predictable outcome of Macpherson’s legacy: officers socialised to fear being labelled racist more than failing to protect life. Listen to Henry’s father. Watch the leaked video and don’t look away. Henry didn’t get a dignified death. He died frightened, drowning in his blood while being mocked and then advised of his rights. Scriptwriters would be sent back to the room if they suggested something so on-the-nose in a gritty drama—yet this is grotesque UK reality. People should be furious about it. The government is paralysed by ideology, fear, and cowardly shamelessness. Genuine media that holds power to account is in short supply. Setting anger aside for a moment, multiculturalism erodes the pre-political loyalty that underpins state legitimacy—the special sauce of governance. When institutions apply justice asymmetrically—aggressive on Islamophobia or native 'hate', hesitant or inverted when minorities are perpetrators—trust collapses. This is textbook anarcho-tyranny. Polls show historic lows in institutional confidence. Incidents like Nowak’s, amplified by grooming scandals, knife crime disparities, and uneven protest handling, accelerate the collapse. The consequences are stark: feral zones in cities, rural-urban fractures, nativist backlash, and escalating intercommunal violence. Would you choose to walk your dog where Wayne Broadhurst was stabbed to death, or send your son to university where he might be degraded while dying and begging police for help? What would you do if violence and rape regularly targeted you and yours and the police seemed indifferent? It used to be brushed off as part and parcel' of modern urban life, or 'don’t look back in anger'. That was low, dishonest, and weak. Now the strategy is silence—which may be the least bad option left for this dishonest, discredited government. We are sliding toward the civil conflict I have warned of—not as cause, but as consequence—of Britain’s unravelling as a coherent nation. The drivers are obvious because they strike normal people faster, wider, and deeper. The reactions are predictable. War is adaptive behaviour; civil war is simply more brutal and socially miasmic. Henry’s killing is not an isolated tragedy. It is a chapter in a larger, nationally suicidal debacle imposed on ordinary people by a governance system that has grown functionally undemocratic over thirty years.