SPOILER ALERT: SARS-CoV-2 is a circulating vaccine-derived-coronavirus (cVDCV) via the PLA, but borne from work originally done at UNC, the only institution that’s been attempting to design a LAV for SARS and chimeras needed for attenuation... harvard2thebighouse.substack…

IF ONLY THE PEER-REVIEWED LITERATURE REGARDING AN ENGINEERED VIRUS HAD COVERED THIS SIX-YEARS AGO!! "In addition to the possibility of obtaining a furin cleavage site through natural recombination in a secondary host or through serial passage either in a laboratory or on a commercial farm, one could have been spliced directly into the novel coronavirus's backbone in a laboratory using classic recombinant DNA technology that has been available for nearly 20 years. This allows for the removal of the restriction site junctions that are the telltale sign of direct genetic manipulation and permits reassembly without introducing nucleotide changes—creating a virus without any evidence of manipulation using the aptly named “No See'm technology.”[ 24 ] pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/article…

China: the PLA watching the live-attenuated vaccine which they tested on the Uighur Concentration Camps revert faster-than expected at the Wuhan Military Games due to the same conditions that leads to OPV reverting - overcrowded toilets.

I’ll never forget his red eyes bulging out of his head. He was in agony. When I tried to move Him Rocky he would just collapse in fear. His blood results said he was as good as dead. Today just 23 days later he is standing tall and proud with 50% eyesight back. ❤️

I promise you this will fill your heart full of joy. Nothing captures the positive bond between a human and their dog quite like this. Priceless ❤️

As David Reich recently remarked on the BBC, “The standard view has been that natural selection has been quiescent in our species over the last several hundred thousand years … that paradigm is just wrong.” The paradigm he is challenging is closely associated with the neutral theory framework, which holds that most genetic variants are not subject to selection and has long shaped interpretations of human evolutionary history. This raises an important question: to what extent are the broader implications of this reassessment fully appreciated? Many influential conclusions in human evolutionary studies—including aspects of the prevailing Out-of-Africa model, as well as interpretations in Reich’s own work—were developed under assumptions consistent with that framework. If those assumptions require revision, it follows that at least some downstream inferences may also need to be re-examined. In this context, alternative perspectives—such as the maximum genetic diversity (MGD) theory, which posits a more pervasive role for selection—may warrant closer consideration as frameworks for reinterpreting empirical patterns.

Many have recognized that the genetic equidistance phenomenon is striking and cannot be adequately explained by the conventional molecular clock theory, and have attempted, largely in vain, to uncover its underlying cause. "We are actively pursuing the answers to these questions and are excited about what these studies may reveal." Molecular Equidistance: The Echo of Discontinuity? icr.org/article/5867/

fluent in mandarin. was living in China and read early wechat messages shared by those in the medical field. messages were leaked by industry insider early early early January prior to the crackdown on information sharing in late January. so assume that anything I read is common knowledge. at that time, consensus in the materials I saw was a research product not bioweapon, but also military-funded research so those are slippery categories. the zoonotic playbook in this context is obviously dishonest -- an attempt to discredit most credible explanation (gain-of-function serial passage) consistent with Chinese-language info leaks by arguing against genetic engineering. @Harvard2H had the best early paper on the problem that took the possibility seriously and applied rational analysis, particularly on ferrets and cross-species transmission. i've yet to see anyone address his arguments in the way they deserve, and this includes @mattwridley and @Ayjchan. was blocked by KA for asking whether he still gave the pangolin story credence. the wheel of karma is going to grind most of these people into dust.

Lionel Baratheon the shrimp

Yep. Also, credit to @Harvard2H. Dude nailed this from day one. Nailed the whole damn thing.

Kristian Andersen is doubling down on his zoonotic origin co-authored paper from 2020. So we can now be reassured that Covid is not a lab leak. But then we find this snippet of information: "Conflict of interest statement: Declaration of interests J.E.P., M.W., K.G.A., and J.O.W. have received consulting fees and/or provided compensated expert testimony on SARS-CoV-2 and the COVID-19 pandemic." Is a paper in which the authors have a conflict of interest because they received money to say what they say in the paper a credible scientific work? I'm only a social scientist, but if Orbán was paying me to say that Orbán is no danger to democracy, would I be taken seriously? In fact, if I was making this claim in a serious journal, shouldn't the peer reviewers and the journal editors raise a flag...? Asking for scientific friends. Jennifer L Havens , Sergei L Kosakovsky Pond, Jordan D Zehr, Jonathan E Pekar, Edyth Parker, Michael Worobey, Kristian G Andersen, Joel O Wertheim, "Dynamics of natural selection preceding human viral epidemics and pandemics", Cell, March 6, 2026. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2026.02.006. Online ahead of print.. 2026 Mar 6:S0092-8674(26)00171-6.Cell pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4179…

In Sweden, 10% of healthy life years have been lost since the pandemic began. That’s one out of every ten years gone. 1/x