This says it all for me. Our club and fanbase, really needs to get their head out of its arse. Forget the past, and do a 180. If we don’t, I can see fat Sam coming back and saving us again.

If Starmer was genuinely concerned about under-16s, why didn't protect them from muslim rape gangs?

If Queen Elizabeth was a Rolls Royce what is King Charles?

синяя правда Number 159 June 2026 Diplomacy Part Three : Reflections In a Mirror Magic show Well done clarets. A defence of Burnley Counter revolutionary rehabilitation bagfulloftoffees737918539.wo…

Tommy Robinson has just walked out of court with a victory that is already being called one of the most explosive free-speech moments in Britain. The terrorism-related case against him — linked to his refusal to hand over his phone PIN to UK police — was thrown out after the judge ruled the stop unlawful and reportedly said Robinson had been targeted because of his political views. This was not just about a phone. This was about power, politics, journalism, and whether the state can treat someone like a national security threat simply because it dislikes what they say. Robinson says he refused to unlock his phone to protect journalistic sources. The state treated it as a terrorism matter. The court, according to Robinson’s reaction, saw something far more disturbing: political targeting. Then came the detail that made the story explode worldwide: **Elon Musk reportedly helped finance Robinson’s legal defense**, stepping in where others stayed silent and turning the case into a global battle over free expression. Robinson thanked Musk publicly, asking why it had taken an American businessman to fight for justice in Britain. “First of all, thank you, Elon Musk,” Robinson said, before adding that he was targeted because of his political beliefs and that counterterrorism police were allegedly used to get access to his phone as a journalist. For supporters, this ruling is a brutal warning to the establishment: if terrorism powers can be used against controversial speech today, who will be next tomorrow? Critics will still call Robinson divisive, but this case has forced a bigger question onto the table — do rights only apply to people the government likes?

Another good read from Martin. This bit nails it for me. I worshiped Sharp as a player. However, that ended with his part in the near destruction of EFC. Plus the way he treated the fan. He doesn’t exist anymore for me.

@theesk Not to everyones taste! синяя правда Number 159 June 2026 Diplomacy Part Three : Reflections In a Mirror Magic show Well done clarets. A defence of Burnley Counter revolutionary rehabilitation bagfulloftoffees737918539.wo…

“One of the main problems in the countryside is dogs. Muslims don’t like dogs.” Liberal commentator complains that the British countryside is racist and Muslims avoid going there because too many people walk their dogs, which are haram in Islam. These people are truly insane.

Keir Starmer won’t stop your kids being attacked by illegal migrants, he just doesn’t want them reading about it on the internet

Once again, UK police target a lone white British man at a protest. One officer makes a beeline for him, loses his hat in the rush, and they pile in with brutal force. Pure bullying, violence and victimisation. This is two-tier policing in action — patriots get hammered while invaders get a pass. The police have become the regime’s thugs. Time to clean house. 🇬🇧 (video courtesy of @W_L_M__U_K)

17-year-old debater, Young Bob, has been assaulted. No young person should face violence for expressing their views or taking part in public debate. Those hood rats need to be identified and held accountable. Young Bob needs Sercurity protection urgently

Oh, Keir. The man who couldn't protect children from grooming gangs in Telford, Rotherham, and Rochdale now wants to protect them from TikTok. You let thousands of unvetted migrant men into hotel rooms next to schools. You called working-class parents "racists" for worrying about their daughters. Your CPS failed to prosecute rapists. And now you want a round of applause for banning Instagram? You're not a Prime Minister. You're a sad, lonely old man no one listens to anymore. You're nothing. A placeholder. A man who watched children be raped by the thousands and thought the problem was the parents' tone. Keep spreading that hate, Keir. It suits you. Hate for parents who speak out. Hate for anyone who notices your failures. Hate disguised as protection while you open the borders to the actual danger. Children don't need their childhoods "back" from social media. They needed protection from the rapists you welcomed. They needed justice from the CPS you ran. They needed a leader who cared more about their safety than his approval ratings. You couldn't protect them from men with knives and hammers. But you'll protect them from memes. How brave. How strong. How utterly, predictably, tragically you. And I can't wait to watch you avoid Trump for the next few days. The man who actually leads will be in the room. You'll be hiding in the corridor, checking your polls, wondering how it all went wrong. Keep posting, Keir. Each one writes the obituary of your credibility.

My son has been asked to wear a Vote Labour t-shirt for 2 weeks as part of a social experiment to see how people react. So far he has been spat on, punched and had a bottle thrown at him. I'm curious to see what's going to happen when he leaves the house.

Media apps have responded to Keir Starmers social media ban: YouTube: “YouTube is a vital resource for young people, educators and parents. Blanket bans push kids out of such curated, supervised, beneficial experiences and towards anonymous, less safe services.” Meta: (Instagram, Facebook) “As we’ve seen in Australia, bans risk isolating teens from online communities and information, and driving them to unregulated alternatives that lack built-in protections and parental controls.” Snapchat: “Because the majority of time spent on Snapchat is in private messaging between friends and family, an outright ban that disconnects teens from those relationships doesn’t make them safer – it may simply push them to less safe platforms.” Elon Musk: (X) “This censorship law is a wolf in sheep’s clothing. The real goal is to enable the UK government to track everyone.” He also said today that the UK is a police state.

I am simply not prepared to be a bystander when the safety and happiness of our children are at stake. We will ban social media access for under 16s, and give children their childhoods back. Read more about it here: keirstarmer.substack.com/p/g…

UK is a police state

🚨 A "BIG MOMENT FOR OUR COUNTRY." Good morning to the millions of everyday Brits waking up to a new digital prison. Keir Starmer has just officially announced his blanket ban on social media for teenagers! He literally stood at a podium, rambled on about his childhood in the 1970s, and claimed he is doing this to keep your kids safe. 🤡 You honestly have to laugh at the sheer delusion. He completely refuses to protect our actual streets from violent criminals, but he is completely obsessed with policing your family's phones. Do not be fooled for a single second! To enforce this ban, every single adult in Britain will now be forced to upload a passport or digital ID just to browse the web! This is not about child safety. It is a massive Trojan horse for total state surveillance. RT if you see right through this scam and refuse to let the Labour elite control us! 🇬🇧🔥

Thumbs up if you agree?