Just a word to my new followers I’m at war with the world and everybody that’s in it (that’s on my good days best not ask about the bad ones😅) you are welcome but you are liable to get hurt (feelings etc) can’t be bothered explaining the obvious&arguing with fools Nuff said🙏🏽

The “Labour” government are working with the Zionist lobby to outlaw all criticism of Israel. crowdjustice.com/case/legal-… Donate to kick the IHRA definition out of public life in Britain for good!

Palestine Deep Dive is rigorous and groundbreaking Palestinian-led media preparing the ground for a world without Zionism Our brilliant new director Jehan Alfarra, alongside our top journalists, Ahmed Alnaouq and Hala Hanina, are all born and raised in Gaza We publish and profile the voices of Palestinians in Gaza, the West Bank and diaspora - as well as supporters around the world The genocidal Zionist entity is in terminal decline. Our journalism is working to hasten its demise Join us: palestinedeepdive.com/p/supp…

I fucking hope so But if they are not What do we do Only thing that works is massive direct action Hopefully a bloodless revolution of a kind and that’s difficult So heads might have to roll ., So be it that’s what I say 🙌🏾

This is not a loss. Palestine Action was so effective in disrupting the Israeli weapons industry, that the state threw all its might at us. By doing so, they've exposed how they prioritise the Zionist regime over its own citizens. As long as we continue to resist, we've won.

The judiciary has again proved itself to be an establishment lapdog. Upholding the Labour govt's appeal against the deproscription of Palestine Action is an offence against decency. How in God's name can trying to stop genocide be described as terrorism? thecanary.co/skwawkbox/2026/…

The BBC spins this story very dishonestly. What does 'shadow fleet' actually mean? Well it means sanctioned by Western Governments. Such sanctions have no standing in international law, they are simply threats issued by Governments. They use 'international sanctions' to make them sound legal Under international law, the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) all vessels - even foreign warships and submarines - have the right of unimpeded passage through the English Channel. There is a real danger here in that the more contempt the British Government shows for international law, the more it trashes the rights of foreign civilians, the more international law simply disintegrates and the greater risk they expose British citizens overseas to.

We need to push this crowdfunder. How many of you really believe in free speech?

- Michael Parenti

Meet Estelle Whalley. 51 years old. Penwortham, Lancashire. Convicted of attempted murder. Possession of a knife. Wounding with intent. Victim: a man in his 50s. Stabbed repeatedly outside The Black Bull Inn, Pope Lane. Sentenced to 10 years and two months at Preston Crown Court. The BBC did not mention her ethnicity once. Now Brierfield, Lancashire. 12 June 2026. 17-year-old girl. Stabbed in the back of the neck on Wood Street. 30-year-old man arrested on suspicion of attempted murder. BBC wrote “described him as a British man of Pakistani heritage.” Same force. Same offence. Same county. Same outlet. For Whalley, the BBC didn't mention her ethnicity. For the Brierfield suspect, they did. This isn't a one-off. It's a pattern, repeated until it becomes the public's default association: stabbing equals Muslim, equals Pakistani, equals threat. One ethnicity flagged. One ethnicity erased. Both times, by the same broadcaster. That's not neutral reporting. That's a choice. And choices repeated often enough stop being choices and start being policy. This is why we exist. We document every case, on every side, with the source attached. Report: Islamophobiauk.co.uk Keep us alive: ko-fi.com/islamophobiauk Substack: substack.com/@islamophobiauk

9 Years After Grenfell: 72 Dead. 0 Jailed. The System Worked Exactly As Planned

So @lisanandy says the govt is making cuts to increase so-called "defence spending." But that begs the question defending us from what? Britain isn't facing any military threats. It's just total bs. As Smedley Butler said in 1935 - WAR IS A RACKET. theguardian.com/politics/202…

Today marks 9 years since the Grenfell Tower fire. But 9 years on, there is still no justice. 9 years on & people still live in unsafe buildings. We must not forget those killed because of dishonesty and corporate greed.

Starmer is letting this public land theft event go ahead while sentencing young women and men opposing it as terrorists. The @metpoliceuk is a wing of the complicit British cabinet that has funded the genocide in Gaza. Such actions amount to complicity in war crimes and anyone working for them should face draconian consequences.

YeahListenMrMurray is dropping Bars🎙 Don’t believe DaGenocidal Complicit BritishGovernment Dem R fucking liars with blood on their hands West hate Russia cause they can’t beat them Russia don’t take no shit They have played fair with Ukraine Could/should ave destroyed them

Why is it that dumb white racists who come at me unloading their ignorance about Gaza/Hamas/ Filton4/ Terrorism/Genocide/ WhiteSupremacy never show their ugly faces, what they got to hide 🤔 some subconscious guilt about talking shit: Just Fuck Off You’s Not Worth my time/effort

If you're under the impression Filton activists attacked & smashed the spine of a policewoman with a sledgehammer, you've been thoroughly misled by the media you're reading. Perhaps ask yourself how many other lies you've been fed? For balance maybe follow @declassifiedUK etc

Two things I cannot get my head round being legal: 1. Charging young people 9 % p.a. interest on their student loan. 2. A judge sentencing young people as terrorists despite their never having been charged with terrorism.

There are lots of people on here drinking the security services Kool Aid over the sentencing of the Filton Four. They believe the judge was right to overturn the jury's decision to convict four anti-genocide activists of criminal damage and make it a terrorism offence instead, overturning centuries of legal precedent. Why? Because, they claim, the four activists broke / smashed / shattered a police woman's spine. But that obviously can't be the explanation because three of the activists had nothing to do with that incident and yet they were convicted as terrorists by the judge anyway. Even Samuel Corner, the activist who was convicted over this incident (which left the police woman with a minor fracture, according to the medical authorities who testified), shouldn't have been sentenced as a terrorist for it because that is not what the jury, which heard the actual evidence, decided. The jury convicted Samuel Corner of grievous bodily harm *without intent*. The prosecution had charged him with GBH *with intent* because they needed that as his conviction to build a public mood in support of the proscription of Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation. If Corner could be presented as having entered Israel's Elbit weapons factory with intent to commit violence, then the implication would be that the other activists were in on that plan – a conspiracy – and the government would be off the hook of violating fundamental legal norms by proscribing Palestine Action. By stripping out intent, the jury pulled the rug from under the government's feet. Judge Johnson's task was put the rug firmly back in place by riding roughshod over the jury's decision and sentencing them as terrorists anyway. The timing couldn't be more convenient. On Monday, the Appeal Court will be deciding on the government's appeal against the High Court declaring its proscription of Palestine Action unlawful. If you're peddling the "But they smashed the back of a police woman" line you've been fed by the Daily Mail and BBC, it's because that is exactly what the government needs you spouting as it upends our age-old rights to jury trials, as it stamps out an honourable tradition of direct action dating back to the Suffragettes and before, and as it gives itself cover for continuing complicity in a genocide. Stop being a cuck. Don't fall for this psy-op.

Aunque lo entierren hondo, aunque le cambien la cara, aunque hablen de esperanza y brille la mascarada, llegará su fantasma bien retratado en las balas. Al Che en sus 98 años, a Maceo a 181 años de su natalicio, y a quienes han dado su vida por la Patria: ¡Venceremos! 🇨🇺 #HLVS