The InvasiBES team investigated the consistency of invasive species' risk assessments
We used data from 1,742 impact assessments 😯of 60 terrestrial, freshwater and marine IAS
We found:
1⃣ High consistency across assessments (67%!!)👍
2⃣ Variability across individual species 👍
What does this mean?
@RBernardoMadrid "These results are encouraging as they suggest that IAS risk assessment protocols are valid to support decision making in the face of worrying forecasts of increasing biological invasions and their damages" 🤓
As well as threatening wildlife, invasive alien species are estimated to cost economic damage of at least €12.5 billion a year in Europe.
The #BewareOfAliens awareness campaign focuses on key messages for key audiences. Download free materials from
easin.jrc.ec.europa.eu/easin…
With the support of @AFProbert Lara Volery @RBernardoMadrid Sandro Bertolino @vane_cespe@FranzEssl1 Thomas Evans, Laure Gallien @BelinGallardo Pablo González-Moreno Marie Grange @CangHUI_Ecologytelios Jonathan Jeschke @SKatsanevakis @KuhnIngolf ...
wait, there's more!
Native #biodiversity can be negatively or positively affected by alien species; however the existing EICAT scheme only assesses negative impacts. The proposed new EICAT scheme enables positive impacts to be categorized @InvasiBES#PLOSBiologyplos.io/3A5vfAK
With the participation of @BelinGallardo, Montserrat Vilà and led by master student @Gio_Perez__ 👏👏👏
Funded through the 2017-2018 Belmont Forum and @BiodiversaPlus joint call for research proposals, under the BiodivScen ERA-Net COFUND programme