Every time I drop the raw
@premierleague data (GW3 & GW5), accounts always appear out of thin air to βcontextualizeβ the numbers, with the sole intention of downplaying any optimism and steering the fanbase toward pure negativity.
The data is raw, and itβs compared against 19 other Premier League teams, each with their own context, game states, sample sizes, and all the other arguments people use to diminish positive metrics.
Everyone who watches the games knows the raw data never tells the whole story and thereβs still a lot of work to be done.
Use the data as you please, but I encourage everyone to actually watch the games as well. I see progress both in the data and on the pitch.
Hope this helps.
Premier League 25/26 updated data after GW5 π
ππ«π£πππ§ππ ππ’πππ¦ (π
π):
1οΈβ£ Man Utd β 9.7
2οΈβ£ Man City β 9.3
3οΈβ£ Crystal Palace β 8.3
π¦ππ’π§π¦ π’π‘ π§ππ₯πππ§:
1οΈβ£ Liverpool β 23
2οΈβ£ Man Utd/Chelsea β 21
3οΈβ£ Man City β 20
π¦ππ’π§-ππ₯πππ§ππ‘π πππ§ππ’π‘π¦:
1οΈβ£ Man Utd β 145 (29.00 p90)
2οΈβ£ Liverpool β 126 (25.20 p90)
3οΈβ£ Bournemouth β 122 (24.40 p90)
π§π’π¨ππππ¦ ππ‘ π’π£π£. ππ’π«:
1οΈβ£ Arsenal β 150
2οΈβ£ Tottenham β 144
3οΈβ£ Liverpool β 142
(Man Utd is #4 with 138 touches)
π£π₯π’ππ₯ππ¦π¦ππ©π πππ₯π₯πππ¦:
1οΈβ£ Liverpool β 124
2οΈβ£ Arsenal β 117
3οΈβ£ Man Utd β 111
π¦ππ’π§π¦ π£ππ₯ π΅π¬ π ππ‘π¨π§ππ¦:
1οΈβ£ Man Utd β 15.80
2οΈβ£ Liverpool β 14.00
3οΈβ£ Bournemouth β 13.40
π§πππππ π¦π¨ππππ¦π¦:
1οΈβ£ Sunderland β 69.7%
2οΈβ£ Fulham β 66.7%
3οΈβ£ Man Utd β 65.1%