I trust this tweet was made on good faith, but I’m sorry I just struggle to take this argument seriously.
There is much to say, but I’ll just make 3 points:
One, the SBC defines cooperation around “secondary” issues because it is formed around secondary issues. Baptism defines our denomination, but it is a secondary issue. The play to dismiss “secondary” as if it is unimportant just misunderstands (or misrepresents) how denominations work. We need to define these issues clearly because the SBC is formed by these issues as well as the primary issues.
Two, the idea that talking about ecclesiology is a distraction from the ‘real mission’ is simply foolish. We can talk about ministry and practice ministry at the same time. We do this all the time! We can talk about church polity while practicing it at the same time. We can talk about counseling or evangelism or leadership or variety of topics, and none of us think that precludes us from acting on the things we discuss. This objection is frankly so absurd, it feels disingenuous.
Three, the mission we’re called to involves both planting churches and teaching people to observe all Jesus has commanded - this is actually part of the Great Commission! Both of these tasks involve us talking about, clarifying, and then implementing our beliefs on the issue of who serves in pastoral ministry and preaches to the gathered congregation. Our shared mission through our SBC entities demands clarity on these issues precisely because we want to carry out the mission. It is because of the mission that we talk about these things.
In sum, it is just silly to try and paint the issue this way. Nothing we’re doing distracts from the mission. Nothing. We can walk and chew gum at the same time.
I urge you who are reading this to reject these arguments and attempts to emotionally manipulate you into not supporting the Mohler Amendment. No one is against the mission - rather we clarify for the purpose of mission.
Don’t be steered by bad arguments. Be busy about the mission to reach people and plant churches and teach them to observe Christ’s commands. Do ALL of the mission. It’s also ok to discuss and debate these issues while we’re busy doing the work of ministry. We can do both - heck, we do it all the time!
I left Orlando with a simple thought:
The SBC is at its best when we’re talking about reaching the lost, planting churches, sending missionaries, training leaders, and seeing people baptized.
For those wondering, I voted no—not because I reject complementarianism or male eldership, but because I believe our confession already addresses the issue, our processes already enforce it, I think clarity should actually clarify, and our cooperative mission is too important to continually make this our loudest conversation.
I believe in male eldership.
I believe our confession already says so.
I believe our churches know it.
And I believe our cooperative mission is too important to allow secondary fights to become primary conversations.
The world is too lost.
The gospel is too good.
The mission is too urgent.
Let’s get back to reaching people with Jesus.
#SBC26