We must not let a “social media ban” become Digital ID by the back door. Protect privacy. Protect the open internet. @Keir_Starmer #DontIDTheInternet dontidtheinternet.com

Too Young for TikTok, Old Enough to Vote? dailysceptic.org/2026/06/17/… via @LD_Sceptics

If Vladimir Putin changed the voting system days before an election to stop his opponents winning, every British journalist would call it what it is: rigging the rules. Tonight, Labour rammed through a last‑minute switch in the Lords so that if Andy Burnham wins Makerfield and quits as Greater Manchester Mayor, his replacement won’t be chosen on a simple first‑past‑the‑post ballot, but on the supplementary vote system instead. Why now? Because Labour knows the race to replace Burnham would be a straight two‑horse fight with Reform UK – and under FPTP, the candidate with the most votes wins, no second chances, no back‑room redistributions, no “stop Reform” stitch‑ups. Under SV, Labour gets a second bite of the cherry: if their candidate can limp into the top two, they can hoover up second preferences from every other party and magic a “majority” on the second count, even if Reform tops the poll on first preferences. This isn’t “modernising democracy”. It’s the governing party using its Commons majority and the unelected Lords to hurriedly doctor the rules of one specific contest because it’s terrified the voters might choose someone else. When the establishment preached to the world about “rules‑based order”, they forgot to mention one thing: in Britain, the rules are “based” on whether Labour thinks it might lose.

One of the ‘trans women’ openly boasting about going to the women’s pond and defying the law last week included Sarah Jane Baker, a man who served 30 years for kidnap and torture. This is who the GLP fights for…

🚨 Listen very carefully to what Tony Blair and Larry Ellison of Oracle are telling you. Everything about you will be centralised as data, run by AI, from your genome to your behaviour. You will be watched & monitored constantly. The Panopticon is being built without consent. And when it’s built they won’t need to bother asking you anything anymore. Why do you really think they need those data centres 🚨

Another example of Keir Starmer’s Stasi Britain. This street flies England flags up and down every single World Cup. This year the council have told them they’re not allowed, in case “it makes other people who aren’t perhaps from England feel uncomfortable and not welcome.” If seeing an England flag makes you feel uncomfortable or unwelcome… then do one and go back home! 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿

A blazing Sammy Woodhouse exposes a @GMB producer who told her not to mention the race or religion of the Pakistani Muslim men who raped and trafficked thousands of girls like Sammy. Exactly why the monsters got away with it for so long!

The Rape Gang Inquiry - what happens next. I intend to use my parliamentary privilege to name perpetrators and their enablers in the chamber. This will be done incredibly carefully with our legal team involved every step of the way to ensure that no future prosecutions are jeopardised. We are cooperating with the authorities in order to help cases be opened and reopened, but my faith in the system to independently deliver justice is not high... That is why we are pursuing private prosecutions and civil litigation. A target list has been identified, and it continues to grow. This all has to be handled very carefully, for obvious reasons, but I am determined to act. We have had enough talk, now we need to act. Our aim is straightforward. Put people in prison. Deliver justice. Finally. We will act. Not talk.

The Free Speech Union has serious concerns about the Government’s proposal to ban under-16s from some social media platforms (but not others). When the proposal was first announced, ministers cited supposedly 'harmful' platforms such as X, Facebook and YouTube, but made no mention of the left-leaning Bluesky. A selective ban, rather than a blanket one, means Ofcom will be tasked with enforcing the political preferences of whichever government happens to be in power. If there's a change of government, will X be taken off the banned list and Bluesky put in its place? Another concern is enforcement. How exactly does the Government intend to make the ban work in practice? In Australia — the model ministers appear keen to follow — many under-16s continue to access social media through VPNs. Will the Government’s next step be to ban VPNs as well? That would put the UK in the same company as Turkmenistan, Iran and North Korea. The Government has also failed to explain how this proposal can be reconciled with its duties under the Online Safety Act to protect content of democratic importance and journalistic content — duties that are due to come into force next month. This is particularly important given the Government’s intention to extend some social media restrictions to 16 and 17 year-olds and at the same time lower the voting age to 16. How can 16 and 17 year-olds be expected to participate meaningfully in the democratic process if the Government is restricting the content of democratic importance and the journalistic content they're able to access? The Free Speech Union will be keeping a wary eye on the Government’s plans 👇

We notice that Archie Norman is very careful not to define what “woman” actually means at M&S. That’s both clever and disingenuous. In the past, M&S has told us that “the women’s fitting rooms are for women”, but when we asked them to clarify what they mean by “women,” they refused to confirm that it means biological women, thereby confirming they included men who ‘identify’ as women. If “women’s fitting rooms” are only for women, he should say so clearly and ensure that the policy is properly communicated with signs to inform customers. He also fails to mention whether this applies to M&S fitting rooms with “Try On” signs, which stores have told us are mixed-sex. Are they bringing back ‘womens’ and ‘mens’ fitting rooms, or hiding behind the ‘Try On’ sign? We’d love some definitive clarity on this, M&S!

This man is a monster and surrogacy needs to be banned.

🚨The BBC caught red handed. Remember the Question Time episode where illegal migrants were planted in the audience to lecture me and the country on our border policy? We now have *confirmation* the BBC PLANTED there and they were COACHED on what to say by a charity pushing for open borders. The CEO of this 'charity', Jenni Regan, was also in the audience and chosen to ask a question. Note, when I formally complained to the BBC about this and explicitly asked them if the audience members were coached, the BBC refused to answer. Now we know why. One of these men who broke into the country began reading a statement warning against Britain leaving the ECHR, even featuring the Northern Ireland protocol! One of them specifically attacked me and my family. Because they had been coached to do so. The BBC is morally bankrupt. To deliberately plant men who broke into Britain illegally in the audience, allow them to be told what to say and let them launch into attacks on Reform and lecture the British people is disgusting behaviour. To conceal it is even more outrageous. They should apologise immediately.

The victim testimony of Chloe from the rape gang inquiry is horrific - Abducted by a Muslim abuser - Raped her at 12 years old in a graveyard - Raped her with a whiskey bottle which broke off in her vagina - NHS removed the pieces but asked NO questions - Plied with drugs and drink - Told police she was having sex with adults but was dismissed as a child prostitute - Passed between men daily for years - Police found her with abusers but released men after no investigation - Chlamydia in throat/vagina, gonorrhea, warts, PID at age 13, clinic said NOTHING - A social worker suggested she audition for a TV role as a grooming victim instead of helping. As she got older: - Gang invaded her home, orally raped her on her sofa in front of others. - Raped with objects (cans, keys, baseball bat) - Forced to house and witness abuse of other children. - Spiked with heroin, leading to addiction and anorexia (weighed 5 stone/~70 lbs at 18). - Coerced into Islamic conversion and "marriage" to an illegal migrant abuser who beat her daily - gave birth to a child with health issues from her damaged body. This all happened in Britain In our country To our girls

Look at the state of the blue haired transvestite protesting outside of the Oxford Union tonight. A meme brought to life.

Net Zero Can Never Be Worth it dailysceptic.org/2026/06/17/… via @LD_Sceptics

Today Layla Moran MP, Chair of the Commons Health and Social Care Committee, will host a meeting with the surrogacy agency Surrogacy UK to lobby for law liberalisation. To object to relaxed surrogacy laws, send an email to your MP from our website- it takes under 2 minutes.

What Ed Miliband has done to the local economy in Aberdeen is absolutely disgraceful. He has choked off the oil and gas economy because of his net zero claptrap. Absolutely shameful.

This is the “quality” of @UKLabour MPs. How on earth do idiots like this one get through the day with reality?! 🤡

The idea society can’t have laws unless you have state enforcement officers checking every single person complies all the time with every single law is quite something. This MP is talking about single-sex facilities and services not being able to survive contact with reality 🤯

If you asked Sammy not to mention the race of her rapists, @GMB - can you tell us all why?