Day 2 of LIVE—Tampa focused on the nuances of deal structuring and due diligence.
@SMB_Attorney of
@smblawgroup walked the cohort through legal diligence and documentation. The three buckets of findings (deal killers, things to negotiate into the PA, things to fix post-close), why asset deals beat stock deals on successor liability, and the real reps and warranties framework SBA buyers actually live with.
@JermanMichael and Adam Webster of
@Hollywellteam ran through QofE. In their hundreds of engagements, can you guess how often they have seen EBITDA come in above the CIM? The QofE is your home inspector, and the line-by-line P&L review, WC scrub, and addback validation are what keep you from buying someone else's mess.
@drew_eckman tore apart addbacks with his 3-part question protocol: (1) one-time or recurring, (2) will the expense exist post close, and (3) can it be documented. Read more in his past thread here:
x.com/drew_eckman/status/198….
Drew,
@sbabmarks, and I ran a live modeling scenario using our financial modeling template where small groups pitched an actual deal, trying to find the price and terms that work for all four parties at the table: buyer, seller, broker, and lender. Watching searchers wrestle with DSCR thresholds and seller note standby periods in real time is where the playbook clicks.
Day 3 of Cohort #20 is officially underway.
Let's talk about addbacks in SMB transactions...
If you’ve looked at brokered deals, you’ve seen the wild claimed addbacks out there.
The real challenge is deciding (a) which ones are legitimate, and (b) which ones a lender will actually accept