Joined February 2009
787 Photos and videos
"President Donald J. Trump’s remaking of Washington, D.C., to reflect his personalized approach to power rather than the American people and their government has become a little too on-the-nose over the past week." Richardson for June 15, 2026 open.substack.com/pub/heathe…

12
John W. Farrell retweeted
It’s war.
Russia was behind arson attacks targeting UK PM Keir Starmer, BBC reveals bbc.in/3Q3lOy1
608
970
7,787
377,067
John W. Farrell retweeted
The United States has been defeated by Iran, and Sunday evening found Trump out on the lawn waiting for the rain to clear so he could begin his party. theatlantic.com/ideas/2026/0…
199
1,664
4,866
285,100
"The First Continental Congress, which met in 1774, refused to establish a standing army, afraid that a bad government could use an army against its people." Richardson for June 14, 2026 open.substack.com/pub/heathe…

19
John W. Farrell retweeted
SEN. KELLY: How many times have Vance and Rubio been to Ukraine? Zero. Has Trump been to Ukraine? No. He invited Putin to United States, but he still failed to send anybody at high level in his government to visit Ukraine. Have Kushner or Witkoff been to Ukraine? They have not.
355
5,740
24,142
437,609
John W. Farrell retweeted
Guards beat Russian mathematician Azat Miftakhov on the soles of his feet, threatened him with rape and shocked him with electricity in Kharp, the Arctic prison where Navalny died. His global fame both shields him and marks him as a target inside — The Moscow Times. 1/
9
465
1,743
52,981
John W. Farrell retweeted
Crimea is Ukraine.
For the first time in 12 years I genuinely believe Ukraine will liberate Crimea. It is inevitable.
575
2,074
19,226
316,345
John W. Farrell retweeted
This is a good summary. The US and especially Trump for electoral reasons needs the war to stop. But Iran gained a lot from the conflict while the US achieved nothing. Trumps price was to stipulate an agreement to negotiate on nukes. But that’s what the US and Iran were doing before the war started. So the nuclear component certainly looks like a fig leaf to give Trump some plausible deniability about how badly this went for the United States. As Dan notes, the US has no real credible threat of force left, certainly not before midterms. This end game was basically inevitable from the first hours or days of the conflict. But we waited three plus months because Trump couldn’t face the reality of the scale of his defeat. And there’s still a good chance this falls apart because he still can’t come clean on that. Altogether, just a great job.
Until the text of the US-Iran deal is signed and released, there is going to be a lot of spin on both sides. But here is my initial take. This war was a mistake, and it needs to end. The President thought that the Iranian regime would collapse quickly, but it did not. In fact, it has been strengthened strategically by its survival against a heavy US-Israeli assault and carrying out some effective counterstrikes. Many countries in the region are now courting Iran and looking to deescalate and rebuild ties. A sign of which way the wind is blowing. Getting the Strait of Hormuz open is the most important outcome of this MOU. Of course, the Strait was open before the war. Now we are paying to reopen it with sanctions relief. Iran has taken a theoretical point of leverage and turned it into a very real and powerful one, imposing costs across the global economy and rattling President Trump. As for the nuclear issues, there really is no agreement, other than to negotiate over the HEU stockpile and an enrichment moratorium. Iran knows how to drag out those negotiations, and try to pocket concessions along the way. It is possible that no deal will every be reached, and very likely that if one is reached, it will be worse than what we could have achieved through diplomacy before the war. Iran is not likely to take seriously that the US would return to war, certainly before the US midterms. So that means we will be conducting diplomacy without a credible threat of force. If any agreement ultimately reached actually safely puts Iran's nuclear ambitions out of reach, I'll acknowledge it. It's just too early to make that judgment. Trump is mainly focused on comparing his deal favorably to the JCPOA. But we are a long way from being able to make that comparison, and it may end up no better, or weaker than that deal. But in some ways, Trump's deal and the JCPOA are already similar. Nothing on ballistic missiles, nothing on proxies, nothing on weakening the regime or helping the Iranian people. And plenty of sanctions relief that will strengthen the regime, and be poured into the missile program and proxy network. Honest critics of the JCPOA will not twist themselves into pretzels to defend Trump's approach. Israelis are deeply disappointed in this outcome, but they should not be surprised. After some initial overlap of Trump's and Netanyahu's interests, there was a strong divergence. The United States needed this war to end. Netanyahu wanted to continue. Trump's claim to include Lebanon in the ceasefire and his harsh shutting down Israeli attacks on Hezbollah is also a win for Iran. After the JCPOA was signed, Obama and Netanyahu worked together to strengthen Israel's campaign of strikes in Syria to intercept Iranian weapons shipments to Hezbollah in Lebanon. So let's hope we see the removal of Iran's enriched uranium and a long-term suspension of enrichment, with full verification. But to achieve those goals, Trump's team is going to need to engage in far more sophisticated diplomacy, backed by qualified experts, than they have to date. If it is a phase one splash with no follow-up on implementation of later phases, like in Gaza, we will be much worse off after, and because of, this war.
22
179
787
164,929
John W. Farrell retweeted
At the start, Europe and the United States had the capabilities to fight but not the will. Ukraine had the will but not the capabilities. Now Ukraine has both and Russia is screwed.
O'BRIEN: Trump believed Ukraine had no cards, that he could bully Ukrainians into giving Putin very good deal. He didn't understand that Ukraine was developing their own capabilities and their willingness to fight. So, Trump failed for two reasons. First, Ukrainians adapted, and that wasn't expected by him. You can see there have been some changes in his rhetoric lately, where he has to grudgingly admit that Ukraine has actually done better. The United States completely underestimated Ukrainian resilience. Secondly, Trump thought Europeans would bully Ukraine along with him because they would be afraid of United States leaving NATO. He thought he could use NATO to push Europeans to force Ukraine to take a bad deal. Europeans eventually helped Ukraine more than he thought. They seem to understand that it's actually better for them to have Ukraine fight the war the way Ukraine wants. Trump didn't understand what Ukraine was capable of and he misjudged what Europeans would do.
103
1,504
7,030
134,071
"Today was the deadline set by Judge Christopher R. Cooper of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia for Donald Trump’s name to come off the John F. Kennedy Memorial Center..." Richardson for June 12, 2026 open.substack.com/pub/heathe…

1
108
Trump never thought the views of his supporters were relevant.
Fiona Hill: Autocracies see the state as strong and society as irrelevant. Individuals have no real role. The fundamental difference with democracies is that societies still matter and in Ukraine, society has shown extraordinary resilience. 1/
1
46
Video of the Day
A raccoon figured out that if he blocks the drive-thru, they’ll give him a donut to make him leave
41
John W. Farrell retweeted
.@JamesTalarico: There's been a lot of talk in this race about what it means to be a real man. Recently on the campaign trail I told the story of my adoptive dad, Mark Talarico. Every Saturday morning, he would mow our lawn, and then without anyone asking him to, he would go next door and mow our neighbor's lawn because she was a widow. My dad never talked about it — he just did it, because that's what a man does. A man takes responsibility, upholds his commitments to his family and his neighbors, and does what's right, even when no one is watching. Here's what real men don't do. They don't lie and cheat their way through life, sell their soul to the highest bidder, or steal from other people in order to enrich themselves. Real men serve others. Weak men serve themselves. I welcome this debate about what it means to be a man, and I don't think Ken Paxton or Ted Cruz are in a position to tell anybody what a real man is.
919
4,036
17,261
420,936
John W. Farrell retweeted
Why did Hegseth, on D-Day, ignore the invasion of Ukraine while decrying an "invasion" of immigrants across the Mediterranean? Because Trump's focus isn't on Russian aggression. It's on "keeping Muslims and Africans out of Europe and the United States." thebulwark.com/p/sorry-thats…
2
13
55
5,045
John W. Farrell retweeted
Sportswashing is a standard tool of authoritarians, put on a grand stage at the Berlin Olympics in 1936. Like the IOC, FIFA doesn’t "stick to sports" when it does this; it provides a propaganda platform. This year's hosts are democracies, but Trump knows the game. My latest:
"To host a World Cup, a nation need only be as democratic as the Argentine junta (1978), as transparent as Qatar (2022), and as peaceful as Russia (2018)." Read @Kasparov63 on Trump, FIFA, and the World Cup: thenextmove.org/p/the-trump-…
9
263
931
44,389
John W. Farrell retweeted
Military historian Phillips O’Brien: There have been no U.S. peace efforts in Ukraine. There have been efforts to get Putin a very good deal, forcing Ukrainians to give up more territory and people. That is not peace. That is Washington trying to deliver Putin a success. 1/
67
2,313
7,410
171,799
"Later, he called into the Fox News Channel to say: “Look, my preference has always been take Kharg Island…." Richardson for June 11, 2026 open.substack.com/pub/heathe…

47
"Today a report from the Department of Labor showed that inflation in May hit its highest level since early 2023, reaching an annual rate of 4.2%, up from 3.8% in April." Richardson for June 10, 2026 open.substack.com/pub/heathe…

11
John W. Farrell retweeted
Становится всё более очевидным, что Путин — это полный провал. Всё большее число россиян тоже так считает. - Больше границ с НАТО, чем когда-либо. - Больше стран — членов НАТО, чем когда-либо. - После Украины в дверь ЕС стучатся также - Азербайджан и Армения. - Изоляция в Европе. - Сокращение продаж ископаемого топлива вдвое. - 1,4 миллиона убитых и искалеченных на войне. - Сокращение экономики. - Большая часть золотого запаса взорвана в Украине. - Потеряны самые близкие союзники. - Россия деградировала до вассала Китая. - Профессиональные армейские подразделения обескровлены. - Проблемы со снабжением в Донбассе и в Крыму. - Черноморский флот обескровлен. - Русского языка и влияния в Украине меньше, чем когда-либо. - Влияние русской культуры в Украине упало до минимума за последние 100 лет. - Советские армейские запасы сильно истощены. Имидж государства-изгоя. - Преступления против человечности. - Полная потеря доверия из-за чрезмерной пропаганды в гибридной войне. - Массовый импорт мигрантов. - Больше убийств, заключённых и агрессии, чем в Европе. - Взрывной рост коррупции из-за войны.
444
2,041
6,940
265,842