I’ve been warning for months about the EU’s insidious long-range plan to build up BlueSky and expand its network partners in preparation for a regulatory ban on X. They’re calling it EuroSky, and the goal is to impose a new Iron Curtain.

You have to read Bill C-34 on The Commission to believe it. It sets the rules on age verification, social media bans, and content removals while serving as combined regulator, investigator and advocate. At the start, Chair alone can be the full Commission. x.com/mgeist/status/20665288…

The hidden agenda ⚠️is the systematic re-engineering of the population's relationship with information and the state. This is not about removing an app; it is about conditioning the next generation to accept a digital existence where all communication, intimacy, and access to reality are state-sanctioned privileges.⚠️🚨 1. THE CREATION OF A CONTROLLED "NEW NORMAL" 🚨🚨 The agenda here is social conditioning. By forcing a generation of children to grow up in a digital environment where access is strictly gatekept by the government, they are acclimating the population to accept state-mediated reality as the baseline. They are creating a cohort that views internet freedom not as a right, but as a dangerous exception that must be regulated for their own safety. 2. ISOLATION FROM UNAPPROVED NARRATIVES 🚨🚨 a high-walled digital garden where children can only interact with a curated, vetted circle of peers. It prevents the "radicalization" or "contamination" of youth by outside ideas, ensuring their worldview is shaped entirely by state-approved educational and social structures before they are allowed into the "wild" internet at 16. 3. SUBJUGATION via ALGORITHMS🚨🚨 government-controlled information diet where the state dictates the pace and duration of content consumption. 4. NORMALIZATION OF BIOMETRIC GATEKEEPING🚨🚨 use the protection of children to force the widespread adoption of facial recognition and ID verification software into the operating systems and platforms of the future. Once this infrastructure is installed to verify who is a child, it becomes a permanent tool for verifying who everyone else is, laying the groundwork for a universal identity checkpoint system. Police State infrastructure blue print 5. THE USURPATION OF FAMILY SOVEREIGNTY🚨🚨🚨 The primary hidden agenda is the legal transfer of parental authority to the state. By asserting the power to dictate exactly what a minor can and cannot consume online, the government is establishing a legal precedent that the state is the ultimate guardian of the child's mind. This effectively relegates biological parents to the role of caregivers rather than decision-makers. The state is positioning itself as the sole arbiter of "maturity" and "safety," stripping the family unit of its right to make subjective decisions about its own children. This establishes a hierarchy where the State supersedes the Family in the shaping of the citizen's psychology. 6. THE CULTURAL STERILIZATION OF SOCIETY🚨🚨🚨 Teenagers are the primary engine of cultural chaos and change. They are the demographic that subverts norms, creates new language, and challenges established power structures. By removing this demographic from the digital public square, the government is attempting to sterilize the culture. The goal is to create a stagnant, predictable cultural environment where the only approved narratives come from established, adult institutions. By silencing the chaotic influence of youth, the state aims to halt the "memetic evolution" of society. They are trying to freeze the culture in its current state to prevent the young from introducing subversive ideas that could destabilize the current power structure. 7. THE SEVERING OF GENERATIONAL CONTAMINATION🚨🚨🚨 Youth culture often serves as the transmission vector for new ideas both good and bad that eventually reach the older, voting population. By segregating the youth into a "safe" (heavily monitored) digital environment and the adults into the "open" internet, the state is preventing the "contamination" of the adult population by the radicalism of the young. This is an attempt to protect the stability of the current voting bloc by insulating them from the experimental, volatile, and often anti-establishment behaviors of the next generation. It creates a quarantine zone for subversive youth culture to ensure it does not infect the mainstream society.

It’s important to know that the social media ban for under 16s is not a ban for under 16s. It is a ban on *selected* social media for EVERYONE. Until you identify yourself.