Two of the bigger questions for the
#pcaga regarding an AI study committee is 1) do we as the PCA need to do this? and 2) why can't we simply use other available resources? I believe the answer to these questions lie within the advice from the Administrative Committee's advice.
"Again, we recognize that Artificial Intelligence is a significant part of learning, life, and work. Our goal is not to discourage its ethical use in professional or administrative contexts, nor to suggest that its use is inherently problematic, however, the Church must understand when a data processing tool acts as a helpful aid and where it oversteps its functional bounds. To that end, we affirm the following essential distinction:
We adhere to Scripture as the sole source of ultimate truth.
AI is a tool for work; AI is not a tool for truth.
Hence there is a need for direct engagement with the Bible. Because AI possesses extraordinary retrieval and processing capabilities, it may be viewed by some as an interpretive authority, acting as a sort of middleman between the believer and the Word of God. We should be cautious that the convenience of AI-generated summaries does not replace the believer’s direct, meditative engagement with the Word of God or the Spirit’s work through the historical witness of the Church."