@RisDeSmy I absolutely love the beautiful hand made ornaments & earrings Christine. I shall treasure them always xx

This is really disturbing. Labour are looking at VPN bans, overnight curfews and introducing total State control of the internet.

UK is a police state

Once again, UK police target a lone white British man at a protest. One officer makes a beeline for him, loses his hat in the rush, and they pile in with brutal force. Pure bullying, violence and victimisation. This is two-tier policing in action — patriots get hammered while invaders get a pass. The police have become the regime’s thugs. Time to clean house. 🇬🇧 (video courtesy of @W_L_M__U_K)

This is the video Andy Burnham doesn’t want you to see 👇

These two are members of @AntiRacismDay they helped attack him and then stole his stuff. Spread this around and hunt the fuckers down

This is the Man who assaulted and stole @YoungBobRB equipment Do your thing guys . Make him famous RT

This pair of bastards are stealing a 17 year old boys belongings after assaulting him.

Will be starting a thread for those involved in the Young Bob situation. Please feel free to pass on this information to the police. First up: Daniel (Jasmine) Rushby - transgender thing. SUTR Manchester, alleged to live in the Levenshulme area.

I DETEST KEIR STARMER. Repost if you do too.

Parliament is being asked to legalise assisted suicide. Again. This time, unless we make our feelings known, they can force it through - Click here: cgo.ac/scOwS1tbS

So let me get this ABSOLUTELY straight… The public are being told facial recognition cameras, Digital ID and eventually digital currency are all about “security” and “safety”. Meaning every payment, every document and every movement could one day be linked directly back to YOU. But here’s the part hardly anyone talks about… MPs and members of the Royal Family are reportedly exempt from parts of Digital ID systems for “security reasons”. So the very people creating and supporting these systems won’t necessarily have to live under them in the same way as everyone else. Ordinary people could end up being monitored through one vast digital network, while those at the top remain outside parts of it. Whether you support Digital ID or oppose it, surely the same rules should apply to everyone. Because the moment people believe there is one set of rules for MPs, the Royal Family and the political class, and another for everybody else, trust in government starts to disappear. And looking around Britain today, it’s not hard to see why so many people are losing faith. The real issue isn’t technology. It’s whether the people creating the system are willing to live under it themselves and if they aren’t then WHY and WHY should anyone else be expected to then.

🚨NEW: Social media app BlueSky, is absolutely FULL of accounts that claim to be a “minor attracted person” In other words, they are PROUDLY calling themselves a pedophile. BlueSky was also conveniently left off of Starmer’s under 16s social media ban list…… H/T: @Inevitablewest

It Took Eight Years to Listen to a Bereaved Father. It Took a By-Election to Act. Molly Russell died in November 2017. Her father has spent the years since asking governments of both colours to act on the algorithms that fed his fourteen-year-old daughter suicide content until she took her own life. Eight years. The most recent stage of that process was a three-month consultation that closed last month, attracting some 100,000 responses. The Prime Minister told bereaved parents gathered in Downing Street that responding properly would be challenging given the volume, and that he would move as fast as possible by the summer recess. That timeline has now collapsed to days. On Monday Starmer will announce what he calls a "game-changing" ban on under-16s using social media, complete with facial age scans, curfews for teenagers and restrictions on addictive features. The announcement lands three days before the Makerfield by-election, in which Andy Burnham, the man positioning himself to challenge Starmer for the Labour leadership, is standing as the party's candidate. Ian Russell does not believe this is a coincidence. He told the Telegraph there was "no reason other than maybe a by-election in Makerfield" for the sudden acceleration, and called it "political opportunism." From a man who buried his fourteen-year-old daughter and has spent eight years pleading with successive governments for exactly this kind of action, the word "disgraceful" carries weight no opposition politician could match. What makes the timing more damning is the evidence Russell is citing against it. Australia introduced its own under-16s ban in December 2025. Six months on, six in ten Australian under-16s remain on the banned platforms because the tech companies have failed to enforce it and children have found ways around it. Russell's own charity, the Molly Rose Foundation, has just published research showing 47 percent of girls aged 13 to 17 are still being shown high-risk content relating to suicide, self-harm and eating disorders every week, under the existing Online Safety Act that was supposed to have already fixed this. Ofcom admits nine in ten children aged 8 to 12 are using platforms with a minimum age of 13, because nobody enforces the limit that already exists. Russell's argument is not that nothing should be done. It is that the government is choosing a headline-grabbing ban it knows does not work, over the harder regulatory work, forcing platforms to redesign addictive features, that experts say would. He fears that when the ban unravels as it has in Australia, the Prime Minister will be left asking why nobody warned him in advance. They did. This week. There is a precedent for how fast this government can move when it chooses to. Liz Kendall's powers to remove "incendiary" online content during a "crisis" went from announcement to legislation within forty-eight hours. Jonathan Hall, the government's own terror watchdog, raised the national security implications of mass migration through proper channels and received silence that has now lasted for weeks, in the same period that Belfast burned. Eighty-seven thousand four hundred and fifty people sit in the asylum appeals backlog, a figure larger than the population of Carlisle, with no comparable urgency attached to it at all. Two different forms of harm to children and to the country. One produced legislation in two days. The other has waited eight years and counting, and finally moved only once a leadership rival's name appeared on a ballot paper. The question Ian Russell is too polite to ask directly is the one that matters most. What, precisely, does this government consider urgent, and for whose benefit? "Ian Russell does not believe this is a coincidence. He told the Telegraph there was "no reason other than maybe a by-election in Makerfield" for the sudden acceleration, and called it "political opportunism.""

🚨 YOU HONESTLY HAVE TO LAUGH AT THE ABSOLUTE HYPOCRISY. As I have been warning all week, Keir Starmer is desperately trying to lock down your internet and ban social media. But look at what he is doing behind closed doors today. 🤡 He is literally begging Donald Trump for a special exemption from the new American ban on Anthropic. Starmer wants to restrict exactly what you are allowed to see and say online, while demanding unrestricted access to the most powerful technology on the planet for his own government. It is one rule for the globalist elite and a digital prison for the rest of you. RT if you see right through Two-Tier Starmer and refuse to let them control us! 🇬🇧🔥

ADMIN POST Whilst our borders are open, whilst terrorist are coming in, Sudanese migrants are coming in trying to hack peoples heads off and rape our women and daughters, Tommy has been detained under the Counter-Terrorism and Border Security Act 2019 and had his personal possessions seized in order for the UK government to get intelligence. They likely want to see who he is talking to, and maybe find out who his sources are, sources who will expose politicians for their part in the rape of a generation of British girls. This is an attack on free speech, this is an attack on investigative journalism, nothing more nothing less. The Counter-Terrorism and Border Security Act 2019 is there to stop and investigate people who are travelling to plan, prepare and carry out hostile acts. So the UK government must think he's actually a terrorist planning to hurt British people, OR they don't want to be exposed for the child raping facilitators they are. What do you think?

Starmer, Lord Hermer & Shabana Mahmood have given free rein to the police to brutalise patriots 🇬🇧 protesting. Here, a boy aged 5 or 6 is bundled into a police 🚔 car. In another video, a man is thrown into a bollard, his head beating it. He's in a critical in hospital 🏥.