The LEAD Mission To conduct ourselves in an open, transparent and accountable manner. Refusing to engage in short-sighted, politically motivated partisan politics while providing economic, environmental and social leadership in order to benefit LEAD, Zimbabwe and the world.

Your positive vibes light the world President!

#10thParliament Veruzhinji vanokokwa kumisangano inotevera:

Heads up, Manicaland "kumakomoyo", and Mashonaland West. Public Hearings on the Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment No.3 Bill are rolling into your provinces! Check the dates, mark your calendars, and be there! #Zimbabwe #ConstitutionAmendment

Munokokwa kuti muzopa miwono yenyu pandaa inoteera Bumbiro reMutemo reZimbabwe (Chigadziriso Nhamba 3) Bhiri. Mundimi dzakapaukana:

Public Hearings Alert! Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment No.3 Bill hearings are coming soon. Important: Entry is strictly prohibited for anyone in military uniforms, displaying ranks, flags, badges, or political party regalia.

Public Hearings Alert! Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment No.3 Bill hearings are coming soon. Important: Entry is strictly prohibited for anyone in military uniforms, displaying ranks, flags, badges, or political party regalia.

@LEADPartyZim supports reforms that reduce electoral violence, eliminate toxic campaign cycles, and create governance stability, including parliamentary election of the president and proportional representation for MPs. However, we reject any constitutional amendment that weakens institutional independence, expands unchecked executive control, fragments electoral management, undermines judicial transparency, dilutes security sector obligations, or dismantles gender protections. Stability must not come at the cost of democracy. #Zimbabwe

Response to Douglas Mwonzora on Opposition Unity While we welcome any sincere effort toward rebuilding a credible opposition, forgiveness alone is not enough to guarantee a formidable political force. Forgiveness without addressing the structural and ideological weaknesses that have repeatedly divided us will only recycle the same patterns that have weakened the opposition to date. Zimbabweans are suffering under economic collapse, unemployment, inflation, and the systematic erosion of democratic freedoms. They are not looking for political grandstanding or nostalgic appeals. My fellow country people are calling for tangible transformation that improves everyday life. A credible opposition must be grounded in: 1. Clear ideology An opposition without a coherent set of ideas and values risks being a loose collection of personalities instead of a movement committed to real change and progress. 2. Constitutionalism Respect for the rule of law, human rights, and the Constitution must be non-negotiable. Zimbabweans deserve representatives who uphold democratic principles, not just political convenience. 3. Accountability Leaders must be held accountable to citizens and to each other. Unity should not be an excuse to overlook past actions that weakened our collective struggle. 4. Focus on transformation, not wealth accumulation The opposition must prioritise policies that advance social justice, economic inclusion, and national development, not the primitive accumulation of wealth that has too often characterised leadership in our politics. As @LEADPartyZim , we remain on record calling for unity of purpose but that unity must be anchored in our diversity of thought, firm ideological grounding, constitutional respect, and genuine accountability to the people we serve. Only such unity can be truly formidable and worthy of the trust of Zimbabweans.

LEAD PRESIDENT’S COMMENT | RESPONSE TO RBZ BOARD STATEMENT ON “SINGLE-DIGIT INFLATION” While the Labour Economists and Afrikan Democrats (LEAD) take note of the Reserve Bank Board’s announcement on achieving single-digit inflation, we caution against the dangerous habit of celebrating statistical milestones that are disconnected from the lived realities of ordinary Zimbabweans. Inflation figures mean very little to a worker whose salary can not buy basic food, to a pensioner choosing between medicine and transport, or to a small business crushed by unstable pricing, taxes, and collapsing demand. Macroeconomic indicators must translate into tangible improvements in people’s lives. Today, Zimbabweans are still experiencing high food prices, unaffordable rentals, rising transport costs, collapsing purchasing power, and deepening poverty. Any claim of price stability that does not result in living wages, affordable basic goods, accessible healthcare, and functioning public services is cosmetic economics. LEAD maintains that true economic stability will only be achieved through: A people-centered currency and monetary system anchored on productivity, not propaganda. Living wages indexed to the cost of living for all workers. Binding social protection for pensioners, persons with disabilities, and vulnerable households. Transparent public audits of reserves, currency backing claims, and monetary operations. A developmental state that prioritises industrialisation, value addition, and job creation. Zimbabwe does not need public relations victories. Zimbabwe needs structural economic transformation. Until economic policy is measured by how well it feeds, houses, heals, and dignifies the people, @LEADPartyZim will continue to challenge elite self-congratulation and stand firmly with the struggling majority.

Africa must choose sovereignty over silence. We can't afford neutrality in the face of this aggression. The continent’s history is a living archive of what happens when empires normalise resource control, regime interference, and economic coercion. African states that align with or defend U.S. actions against Venezuela must understand that today’s endorsement becomes tomorrow’s vulnerability. From oil in Nigeria, gas in Mozambique, cobalt in the Congo, lithium in Zimbabwe, to strategic ports and trade corridors across the continent, Africa remains firmly in the crosshairs of global power competition. This is the moment for African governments, regional bodies, and liberation movements to reclaim the anti-imperialist clarity that once defined the continent’s struggles. Silence is not neutrality, it is consent. Africa must stand with Venezuela, not out of ideology, but out of self-preservation.

However, Guaidó failed to take power because he never gained control of the military, security forces, courts, or other state institutions. All of these remained loyal to Maduro. As a result, Guaidó had "Western support" but no real power inside Venezuela, Maduro remained in charge. The crisis got worse when the United States expanded existing financial sanctions and imposed major oil sanctions. Maduro accused the United States of trying to effect regime change. In practice, the United States treated Maduro as an illegitimate leader, while Maduro described the U.S. as an imperialist enemy. From this history, you can see a clear pattern. The U.S. has, for many years, tried to exert influence over Venezuela. It first did so by backing a failed coup in 2002. When that failed, it hoped that the removal or death of Hugo Chávez would open the door to a different kind of leader, but that also did not happen. The United States then took advantage of the 2018 presidential election crisis by backing its preferred candidate, yet that effort failed as well. Now, the U.S. is using criminal charges to remove the head of state of a sovereign country by force. This amounts to a clear violation of international law. However, this is not the first time America has taken such an approach, nor is it likely to be the last. Similar actions have occurred in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, and Iran. Ironically, all these countries are rich in oil. The key difference this time is that America is no longer hiding behind diplomacy or propaganda. Donald Trump has openly stated that the U.S. will run Venezuela and generate profits for America while at the same time promising democracy and greater prosperity for the Venezuelan people.

This is Nicolás Maduro, the president of Venezuela. He and his wife were captured and flown out of Venezuela by the U.S military on Saturday morning. Shortly afterwards, Donald Trump announced that the United States had taken over and would run that country until a new leader is installed. Maduro is currently in the United States. He is facing charges related to drug trafficking and alleged links to gangs that are designated as terrorist organizations. Maduro denies all the charges. Venezuela’s Supreme Court has ordered that Maduro’s deputy, Delcy Rodríguez, should takeover as president to avoid a leadership vacuum. Who is @NicolasMaduro? Nicolás Maduro has been president of Venezuela since 2013. He rose from humble beginnings as a bus driver, later becoming a trade union leader. His political journey began in the 1990s when he joined the MBR movement formed by Hugo Chávez. ▪️In 1992, Chávez led a failed coup and was imprisoned. Maduro campaigned for his release and later became part of the movement that backed Chávez’s successful presidential bid in 1998. Around the same time, Maduro became an MP. ▪️By 2005, he had risen to become president of the National Assembly, a role similar to Speaker of Parliament. Maduro soon became a leading member in Hugo Chávez’s government. As you may know, Hugo Chávez positioned Venezuela firmly against U.S. influence and rejected external control over his country’s resources. For context, Venezuela has the world’s largest oil reserves. It is a major player in the global oil sector, though its role is diminished by low production. Chávez introduced very strict oil rules for foreign companies, and any company that refused these terms had its assets taken over by the state. This forms part of what Donald Trump means when he says America lost money in Venezuela. In 2002, the United States backed a failed coup against Chávez. This worsened relations and emboldened Chávez in his anti-imperialist fight. In this sense, he closely resembled Robert Mugabe in his emphasis on national sovereignty and territorial integrity. In 2006, Chavez famously called George Bush “the devil” at the UN General Assembly and described the U.S. as “the biggest menace to our planet.” Maduro was placed at the centre of this diplomatic conflict after being appointed foreign minister in 2006. At one point, he was briefly detained at a New York airport after refusing to be searched. U.S. officials later apologized, saying the airport staff were unaware at the time that he was Venezuela’s foreign minister. But Maduro would have none of it, calling the American government "racist" and "Nazi". By 2012, Maduro was widely viewed as Chávez’s chosen successor as Chávez battled cancer. After Chávez’s death in 2013, Maduro became interim president. A presidential election was held that year, and Maduro won by a very narrow margin. The opposition rejected the result, but Maduro was officially declared the winner. Two years later, Venezuela held parliamentary elections. The opposition coalition won a majority in the National Assembly, setting the stage for the crisis that followed. This meant that even if Maduro won the next presidential election scheduled in 2018, he would be forced to govern with a parliament dominated by the opposition. When the 2018 presidential election was held, Maduro was declared the winner, but just like in 2013, the opposition rejected the outcome. However, things were different this time around. The opposition controlled Parliament. It used that control to declare the presidency vacant. Under Venezuela’s constitution, the Speaker of Parliament assumes power in such cases. The speaker at the time was opposition leader, Juan Guaidó, who declared himself president. The United States quickly recognized Juan Guaidó as Venezuela’s leader and gave his team diplomatic recognition and control over some state assets held overseas.

Americans create a crisis, fix the crisis and become saviours of the same crisis, and ensure elections are won by their puppets who will be worse than the so-called dictator they would have removed. We now know this playbook... #FreeMaduro

Now, this is what we call a patriotic opposition...

Actually, the US props up dictators using a well-documented imperial playbook, refined over decades and repeatedly deployed against nations that dare to assert sovereignty over their resources, political systems, and development paths. The US imperial playbook, "creates, captures, controls". The pattern is painfully familiar. US creates or exploits a crisis through sanctions, covert operations, propaganda, economic strangulation, or support for internal destabilisation. Thereafter, they declare humanitarian concern and frame the crisis as a moral emergency caused by a “dictator,” “strongman,” or “regime.” The Us then intervene as saviours militarily, economically, or politically, under the banner of democracy, human rights, or security. Sadly, the world never learns. Engineering of elections or regime change then installs compliant leaders or systems that prioritise Western interests. Finally, they extract resources, abandon the people leaving behind chaos, weakened institutions, and leaders far worse than those removed. (Refer to the fall of Gadaffi and current state of Libya) This is not accidental at all, it's structural imperialism. Gaddafi's ultimate crime Wlwas independence. Muammar Gaddafi’s real crime was not authoritarianism considering that many US allies are authoritarian. His crime was economic and political independence. He nationalised Libya’s oil. He used oil wealth for free education, healthcare, housing, and infrastructure. Gadaffi pushed for a gold-backed African currency, threatening the dollar and euro. He championed African unity without Western mediation and Libya had the highest Human Development Index in Africa before NATO intervention. After his removal, there is militia rule, open-air slave markets, a collapsed state, and western oil companies are quietly returning. Gaddafi’s fall was not liberation. It was punishment for sovereignty. Other leaders who put their nations first paid the price. ▪︎ Patrice Lumumba (DRC) was assassinated for insisting Congolese control their minerals. ▪︎Thomas Sankara (Burkina Faso) was killed for rejecting IMF debt traps and Western dependency. ▪︎Hugo Chávez (Venezuela) was relentlessly demonised for nationalising oil and prioritising the poor. ▪︎Salvador Allende (Chile) was overthrown for challenging U.S. corporate interests. ▪︎Saddam Hussein (Iraq) was invaded after moving away from dollar-denominated oil. ▪︎Iran’s Mossadegh was ousted for nationalising oil in 1953. In every case, resource control and geopolitical dominance, not democracy, were the real motives. Why is nationalism a crime except when America practices it? America openly declares: ▪︎ “America First” ▪︎Protection of U.S. strategic interests ▪︎Military intervention to secure resources ▪︎Sanctions to force compliance Yet when African, Latin American, Middle Eastern, or Asian leaders say: “Our resources belong to our people” They are branded dictators, threats to global security, human rights violators and enemies of democracy Why is American nationalism patriotism, but African or Global South nationalism tyranny? The answer is simple, the Empire can't tolerate equals. Elections are tools, not principles. Elections are not sacred to empire, they are instrumental. If elections produce leaders aligned with U.S. interests, they are “free and fair.” If they don’t, they are “rigged,” “illegitimate,” or grounds for sanctions and intervention. U.S.-backed leaders often privatise national assets, suppress workers, serve foreign corporations and enrich elites while deepening poverty. They are frequently worse than the so-called dictators they replaced, but they are obedient.

The Nonsense We Are Raising You see it. Ignore it and think it's love. You know your child is nonsense. Because of your own childhood trauma you don't want to discipline him/her. You witness the disrespect, the cultivated laziness, the arrogance worn like a badge. You see the hours bled away on TikTok, the priority placed on appearance over character, the hollow core disguised by brand-name clothes. Yet you look away and whisper, “It’s just a phase.” Let us be clear: it is not. Rot does not magically become fruit. A cracked foundation can not bear weight simply because you hope it will. Here is the hypocrisy: You raise nonsense, yet you pray for a “normal” son-in-law or daughter-in-law. You raise a son who can not manage his own mess, but expect him to find a wife who will serve as his maid. You raise a daughter devoid of basic skills, respect, or self-discipline, yet dream for her a husband of substance, discipline, and wealth. You are, in essence, hoping to outsource your spoilt creation as another family’s burden. This is not love. It is selfishness, perfected. So what are we raising? A generation soft as undercooked eggs that is fragile, slippery, collapsing at the slightest heat of reality. They can't endure failure, hear correction, or accept “no.” The world must contort to their moods, their tantrums, their fragile egos. What do we reap? Adults in grown bodies with the minds of children. Marriages that shatter at the first real challenge. Friendships discarded over imagined slights. Men numbing themselves because responsibility is a weight they were never taught to carry. Women trading integrity for Instagram validation because depth was never demanded. Then the parents act surprised. As if the nonsense plaguing our society sprouted from alien soil and not from the gardens we neglected in our own homes. We pampered. We made excuses. We defended the indefensible. We told teachers, “Don’t be so strict.” We told coaches, “Go easy on them.” We assured ourselves, “They’ll learn.” Now, the world is teaching them with the harsh curriculum of broken relationships, stunted potential, and profound regret. Understand this: you can't plant weeds and expect a rose garden. You can not cultivate irresponsibility and expect a spouse to reform it. You can not nurture arrogance and pray for humility to bloom in marriage. If you raise nonsense, nonsense is your legacy to the world. The tragic truth? The debt will not be paid by your child alone. It will be paid by the spouse who inherits them. By the grandchildren they will confuse. By the community they will diminish. Parenting is not about shielding your child from every hard truth. It is about forging them into people whose character does not become a toxin to those around them. Wake up. Before your child becomes another family’s regret.

Lies have short legs. Venezuelans want their President back!!!

The contradiction is glaring, the United States champions sovereignty and free markets at home, yet appears comfortable denying both abroad when strategic resources are at stake. Putting one’s nation first is praised when America does it but criminalized when others attempt the same.

This is pure evil...

Gold production is rising, but who is really benefiting? On paper, Zimbabwe’s gold production figures look impressive. Record highs, surpassed targets, and glowing narratives of “strong prices and government support.” Yet behind these numbers lies a far more uncomfortable truth: increased extraction has not translated into improved livelihoods for ordinary Zimbabweans. Gold output reaching 46.7 tonnes should, in a functional economy, mean a stronger currency, better-funded public services, improved wages and working conditions, and visible national development. But none of this is reflected in the lived reality of citizens. Instead, we see persistent currency instability, chronic underfunding of health and education, artisanal miners criminalized while politically connected elites accumulate wealth and communities displaced, rivers poisoned, and land degraded with little accountability The key question is not how much gold is produced but who controls it, who sells it, and where the proceeds go. RBZ-reported data alone can't mask gold leakages and smuggling, weak beneficiation, and value addition, opaque contracts and elite capturea and the failure to translate mineral wealth into broad-based economic justice. Zimbabwe does not suffer from a lack of resources. It suffers from a governance deficit. Until transparency, community ownership, fair taxation, and beneficiation are prioritized, rising gold figures will remain a public relations statistic and not a development milestone. Gold should be a national blessing, not an elite windfall. Production without justice is not progress.