Molecular neuroscientist. PET Shop Boy and emotion researcher. CEO for Nummenmaa Oy. Professional science writer and speaker. Porsche aficionado. Trumpet geek.

Joined May 2013
910 Photos and videos
Pinned Tweet
How do we organize the contents of our consciousness? Check the new map of human feeling space in @PNASNews (open access)! Another nice one with @aivoaalto and @eglerean! pnas.org/content/early/2018/…
8
134
356
True also in many other countries 👇. I have had a luxury of having scientifically merited bosses for most of my career (and also right now!), yet when this was *not* the case, the results have been consistently horrific.
"The incentive structure of the modern American university encourages relatively unsuccessful scholars, those who fail to establish fruitful research programs early in their careers, to pursue administrative positions, where they wield authority over more successful colleagues, who actually generate educational value. As a result, the American university is disproportionately governed by relative academic failures."
6
424
Lauri Nummenmaa retweeted
Throwing more money at public schools, even doubling teacher salaries, has virtually no effect on student outcomes.
Elon Musk: Trillionaire Jeff Bezos: Billionaire Public School Teachers: Can anyone help me get some pencils for my students?
112
1,042
8,351
419,338
Lauri Nummenmaa retweeted
Tässä on hyvä artikkeli degrowth ”tutkimuksista”. Ovat pääosin tarkoitushakuista julistusta, joissa lopputulos on päätetty ensin ja sen ympärille on rakennettu heikko tieteelliseltä vaikuttava kehikko. Näitähän pääsee yllättävän paljon myös julkaisuihin, vertaisarviointi on yleensä murskaavaa. Tätä samaa voisi sanoa useimmista postkeynesiläisistä, MMT- ja muista vaihtoehtoisen taloustieteen julkaisuista.
Peer-reviewed literature review on degrowth: ◼️Almost 90% of “studies” are opinions rather than analysis. ◼️Few of them use quantitative or qualitative data; even fewer use formal modelling. ◼️Most of them offer subjective policy advice without policy evaluation. ◼️Most “studies” focus on small, local cases without a clear implication for the whole economy. Source: sciencedirect.com/science/ar…
1
12
76
4,826
Fact check: if you give your money to @elonmusk they multiply. If you give (against your will) your money to the government, they will disappear: google.com/finance/beta/quot…
Elon Musk just became the world's first trillionaire. The typical American household would have to work more than 11 MILLION years to make Elon Musk's level of wealth. We need a wealth tax.
1
4
22
479
Lauri Nummenmaa retweeted
"... the political left has long had a remarkable lack of interest in how wealth is created. As far as they are concerned, wealth exists somehow and the only interesting question is how to redistribute it." — Thomas Sowell
259
922
9,931
339,647
Leftwards ideological bias in US academia per @TheFIREorg is almost unbelievable. It's not that the faculty would be JFK / Obama -style democrats. It's all the way to Sanders / Ocasio-Cortez level "eat the rich and seize the means or production" leftism.
2
9
45
13,504
Which is really weird because investing heavily to developing your abilities should allow you to think clearly & do thriving business to actually help people with their lives, but this does not seem to happen at the unis.
2
12
540
Rejecting the notion of heritable intelligence is obviously a stupid thing, which kinda proves the point about intelligence - some people absolutely fail to understand how the world works, and that's what intelligence really is about.
This is a very crazy thing to believe and definitely shuldn't be the basis of ed policy decisions nymag.com/intelligencer/arti…
4
2
20
866
Kaikkien koululaisten pitäisi osata Suomessa samat asiat, joten standardoitu testaaminen olisi jopa välttämätöntä laadunvarmistusta. Data olisi myös helppo julkaista anonyymisti koulutasolla demografiatiedoin. Jostain syystä molempia vastustetaan ankarasti.
Harvardin tähti­professori: Romahtaneita Pisa-tuloksia ei saada korjattua, jos opettajista ja oppimisesta ei kerätä dataa yle.fi/a/74-20230643
7
13
200
28,088
Välillä miettii että onko näiden yhdistysten tiedotteet tarkoituksellista sumutusta vai onko siellä talousosaaminen nollatasoa. Osingonmaksuhan on vain rahan siirtämistä omistajan taskusta toiseen, jolloin se ei lisää eriarvoisuutta (mitä se sitten tarkoittaakaan) sentin vertaa!
Oxfam: Euroopan suuryritykset kasvattavat eriarvoisuutta osinkojaan jakamalla dlvr.it/TSyQdW
5
11
139
8,150
Tarkalleen ottaenhan ainakin varallisuuserot *pienenevät* osinkoja maksettaessa, koska osingoista on pakko maksaa (tulontasaukseenkin käytettäviä) veroja, toisin kuin yritykseen jäävästä pääomasta
1
1
24
439
This is absolutely crazy - why put a cap on success? As in business, success follows success. This policy equals to prohibiting investing in successful companies and forcing to invest in less successful ones.
In other news, today the NIH proposed caping the maximum of grants at 2 per research lab, including collaborations. grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/… We're living in the upside down.
2
1
4
435
Lauri Nummenmaa retweeted
Jos asiantuntija laskuttaa 120 €/h, se kerrottuna 170 tunnilla tarkoittaa yli 20 tonnin kuukausilaskutusta. Silloin hänelle on varaa maksaa kymppitonnin kk-palkkaa niin, että ”firmalle” jää työstä vieläkin ihan kohtuullinen kate. Aika arvokkaita sihteerejä Migrillä hommissa.
Hei @ORostila , @MartinPaasi ja @TereSammallahti Migri pyytää minulta 4 800 € alv siitä, että saisin nähtäväkseni Nasima Razmyarin Viittakivi Oy:n vastaanottokeskussopimusten taustat. 120 € tunti, ja lisäksi väittävät ettei asiakirjoja ehkä edes löydy, vaikka tiedonhallintalaki velvoittaa ne rekisteriin. Ihanan kallista❤️ Käytännössä viranomainen siis hinnoittelee julkisten varojen valvonnan jopa kaltaiseni erityiskansalaisen ulottumattomiin. Mutta! Teillä on PL 47 § 3 mom. nojalla kansanedustajan tiedonsaantioikeus, jota ei voi torpata laskulla. Kyse on miljoonien eurojen julkisista sopimuksista, joissa hallitusjäsenenä istui samanaikaisesti istunut kansanedustaja. Voitteko pyytää Migristä Viittakivi Oy:n sopimukset, maksuerittelyn ja valvontaraportit? Lähetän mielellään tarkemmat yksityiskohdat. Tämä voisi olla käyttistä myös tulevia eduskuntavaaleja ajatellen🤷‍♂️
21
55
920
51,718
Lauri Nummenmaa retweeted
telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/06… Man attempts to behead another man in the street. "No evidence of terror at this stage, say police" If that isn’t terror, what is? How much more terrifying does it need to be to qualify as terror?
1,059
5,283
32,898
23,746,957
Lauri Nummenmaa retweeted
California made it illegal for any election in the state to require ID. This is nuts.
Costco checks ID. Meanwhile in California..
15,690
45,475
238,140
16,069,222
A large-scale meta-study shows that sex-related stereotypes are overall accurate: " [the results] favored accuracy with a mean correlation of .77" 👇 sciencedirect.com/science/ar…

Stereotypes are true and accurate: Alice Eagly and Judith Hall conducted a meta-analysis on the accuracy of stereotypes regarding differences between men and women. They confirmed that these stereotypes are highly accurate: 85% of the 673 estimates were in the correct direction. There is no reason to "fight against stereotypes" on principle. On the contrary, stereotypes are essentially truths about the world.
1
8
544
Lauri Nummenmaa retweeted
This unqualified bore says his secondhand opinions are “not up for debate.” Yes they are. At a university all opinions are up for debate. If you cannot defend your opinions rationally, either they are indefensible or you are too stupid to defend them. In either case you have no right to force them on students who have expressed their wish to attend a lecture by doing so. thetimes.com/uk/education/ar…
235
2,585
12,891
277,176
Lauri Nummenmaa retweeted
According to Google Scholar, Ed Bartlett's paper from 2001 has only been cited 10 times. It was a quantitative analysis of whether women were routinely excluded from medical research between the 1960s and 1990s. The results revealed that women were not routinely excluded from medical research during that time. Given all the attention this topic receives today in the media and academia, it is quite remarkable that Bartlett's paper has only ever been cited 10 times. The results simply do not fit the narrative. Journalists and academics either refuse to cite it or never bother to look in the first place.
Did Medical Research Routinely Exclude Women? An Examination of the Evidence Published in the journal Epidemiology in 2001. I have screenshotted the entire paper. Conclusion: "A review of sex-specific enrollments in medical research studies, and an examination of the number of epidemiologic studies and clinical trials that included men and women, point to two conclusions: 1) Historically, women were routinely included in medical research, and 2) Women have participated in medical research in numbers at least proportionate to the overall female population."
7
70
289
17,429