STATEMENT ON RECENT MARKET SPECULATION
We are aware of recent social media discussions concerning STBL, its team, and ecosystem activities. As always, we welcome healthy scrutiny grounded in facts and transparency, and would like to clarify a few key points for our community and partners.
1. Team and investor allocations
No STBL team or investor wallets have sold or transferred tokens to exchanges, as reaffirmed in our previous transparency update:
x.com/stbl_official/status/1ā¦
All allocations remain subject to the published vesting schedules, fully verifiable on-chain.
$STBL Tokenomics:
docs.stbl.com/tokenomics-andā¦
The project maintains disciplined supply management, with less than 5% of unlocked tokens expected to be used for operations this quarter, a structure designed for long-term alignment and deflationary net circulation through buybacks and burns.
We would also like to clarify that STBL is not associated in any way with Wintermute or any entity referenced in recent speculation.
Neither STBL nor its affiliated entities have sold any tokens; in fact, the team has continued to accumulate on-market positions to reinforce long-term confidence.
2. USST collateralization and status
USST is a dollar-denominated, RWA-backed stable asset, currently in the final stages of launch. Minting Module and the Multi Factor Staking (MFS) Module are both undergoing external audit and final testing.
Subject to successful completion, STBL will:
- Go live with USST/YLD minting on
dapp.stbl.com, using tokenized RWAs on October 10, 2025
- Launch Multi Factor Staking by October 24, 2025
- Initiate USST mints targeting $100 million, starting with USDY, OUSG and iBENJI as primary collateral
- Begin
$STBL buybacks of up to $1 million per month from October 31, 2025
USST is backed 1:1 by tokenized U.S. Treasuries and money-market funds, held with regulated tier-1 custodians.
Comparing $STBLās market capitalization to early-stage USST collateral is therefore a category error!
$STBL is a governance and value-accrual token, not a stablecoin itself.
3. Community and communications integrity
We have grown through verified organic engagement across DeFi, stablecoin, and RWA communities.
Our independent audits consistently show a healthy and legitimate follower base.
We continue to work with recognized analytics and reputation partners to maintain transparency and data integrity.
4. Independent analysis of recent events
We are engaging an independent third-party blockchain intelligence firm to analyze the recent orchestrated attack campaign and associated wallet activity.
Their findings, along with all verifiable on-chain data, will be made available to the community once the review is complete.
This initiative reflects our continued commitment to fact-based transparency and to protecting the integrity of the STBL ecosystem.
5. Partnerships and marketing programs
STBLās partnerships and marketing initiatives are strategic and transparent, with all material collaborations disclosed through official channels.
Our focus remains on institutional integrations, ecosystem development, and product-led growth, not speculative promotion.
Recent campaigns have prioritized awareness ahead of protocol readiness milestones, aligning communications with tangible progress.
6. Leadership and long-term vision
Our founding and leadership teams have built and scaled multi-billion-dollar businesses in digital assets, fintech, and payments.
We remain focused on building the programmable foundation for ecosystem liquidity, with USST as the stable, yield-backed asset and STBL as the tokenized value layer that powers and accrues from it.
We encourage all participants to verify data on-chain and rely on primary, verifiable sources rather than anonymous commentary.
Our commitment remains unchanged: to build the worldās most credible, transparent, and institutionally aligned stablecoin infrastructure.
Onward and upward š
IMPORTANT UPDATE ON STBL TGE
We have come across certain speculations on social media with respect to dumping of tokens at TGE and we would like to address and reiterate the following:
We have not observed any unusual selling activity apart from the normal liquidity provisioning
that takes place during an upward market.
Market makers are partners that are under contractual requirements to maintain long-term liquidity, which shows the structure is designed to support market health, not quick exits and they are incentivised accordingly to align interests. To give an example, market makers are delta neutral that operate without their own capital and make their revenue out of the spreads between bid (sell) and ask (buy) orders. Market Makers are expected to maintain liquidity depths on order books and an uptime to facilitate a smooth trading experience on the venue that they are providing services on.
Our approach has been to manage float as per our project trajectory. We have a promising roadmap and roll out plans on partnerships, listing venues and utility for STBL ecosystem and are focused on building the best product for the users and community.
We have just started on our journey to build the best stablecoin infrastructure and are in it for the long run, cashing out meaninglessly by dumping tokens neither aligns with our long term goals nor does it justify the value that we are creating.
The event on TGE
Speculation relating to addresses/activities by our market maker, Auros Global
The supply did originate from our market maker, however after detailed review, we have come to a conclusion that the speculation is incorrect.
The wallet address 0x7654D09b4Ead2eB6119a974c74071942Cc56866C does not belong to Auros or any person affiliated with STBL and is an exchange hot wallet.
The movements between wallets that some observers are construing as sales, are related to
operational flows and transfers INTO venue related wallets. These movements, including some MM allocations, are for liquidity provision at exchanges to ensure smooth, two-way trading and stability for all participants around launch.
Additionally, this exchange related wallet address then would be the address from which exchange withdrawals would occur. What some users are conflating is that tokens that were sent there for the purposes of liquidity provision are connected to the subsequent withdrawals from the venue. This is incorrect.
Considering the amount of demand seen at launch on exchange venues, our best guess is that
these activity(ies) may have been carried out by users to trade on the price differences
between the exchange and on chain venues. That is, market participants were possibly buying
on centralised venues, withdrawing and selling on chain to take advantage of price dislocations.
This regularly occurs during periods of high demand market activity at launch, where there is a
significant price difference for a newly launched token which has been deployed across venues.
This is a standard trend that is observed in the market and is ultimately offset by deeper liquidity
provided across all venues the token is available to trade to ensure price harmonisation.
We would like to highlight that the intention of these transactions reflect our best estimate as we are not specifically aware of any coordinated price action. Neither STBL nor Auros are associated with these activities.
Our aim along with our market makers is to facilitate a healthy trading experience across venues and we will continue to strive towards that. We encourage all community members to remain vigilant and verify information before sharing, helping us prevent the spread of misinformation.
Onward and upwards! š