Resonating with a discussion
@nesta_uk 's PolicyLive hosted on 'Data-Driven Missions':
Throwing more of 'the same' at the problem isn't necessarily the way to get different (and/or better) outcomes, as Tom puts FAR more eloquently .
Hit the target, miss the point?
New blog: I have written about “same but more-ism”, a discourse in public policy which means big dogs in their field often ask for more of the same resource (PhD students, “Bobbies on the beat”, etc).
What does this mean if you want to do structural reform?