"Bro just watch the dub" The dub in question:

Can ZSide Outperform Monero and Zcash? Paul Sztorc of @LayerTwoLabs Debates Bitcoin Privacy, Drivechains & Fungibility | Tune-in to a LIVE MoneroTalk episode TONIGHT 6/11 at 8:30PM-EDT! Watch here on X or on YT ➡️: youtube.com/watch?v=LHs8Efnf… Twitch ➡️: twitch.tv/monerotalk Rumble ➡️: rumble.com/user/monerotalk Thank you to our show sponsors @cakewallet & @StealthEX_io

NEW: SCALING #BITCOIN FOR 8 BILLION PEOPLE How should BTC be valued? @Truthcoin argues scarcity and demand aren't the best answers. We discuss: 📌 Why the store of value thesis is wrong 📌 How to value BTC based on TX revenues 📌 Why better tech could unlock $200 trillion Watch ⚡️

Breaking: @LayerTwoLabs eCash .com have raised $5 million, to [1] further our mission of "Making every transaction a Bitcoin txn", and [2] launch a new BTC-fork this August. We must rescue Bitcoin from its crisis of complacency and derangement. Our ideas are cutting-edge -- so they are often misunderstood. But actually -- they are quite popular (especially among OG Bitcoiners). You can look at: our podcast interviews, the Wednesday X spaces, the endorsements on the site -- real people love us. The only haters are bot farms -- and sheep who are easily misled. Unfortunately, Bitcoin is going through an era of great ignorance and cowardice (see "Derangements" below). That is why it is so important to fight back!

Lots of stuff will be coming to eCash.com , including news.ecash.com archive.ecash.com buy.ecash.com forum.ecash.com Some of it will remain Stealth , until the appropriate time But news.ecash.com is out now

Them: You have to provide a valid signature to claim satoshis coins! @Truthcoin: hold my Barolo

$1M Bitcoin in 2027 Everyone thinks @saylor and ETFs get us there. I think it’s @Truthcoin and the @eCashCom $BTC hard fork. I sat with Paul Sztorc who made me realise eCash could be one of the most important forks in bitcoins history, stimulating our greatest bullrun ever. The tldr is in August if you hold bitcoin you get the equivalent in eCash. Now eCash on its own merit is already interesting. It’s led by Paul Sztorc who has spent years campaigning to improve bitcoins mechanical utility. He’s a certified legit Bitcoin OG who wants to add functional layers on-top of Bitcoin to enable Bitcoin to be the rails for the broader world of commerce. He plans to achieve this with side chains that are sort of like L2s on Bitcoin. Imagine if Bitcoin had smart contracts and $btc was the currency for all apps in the world. 🤔so technically it’s already very compelling. You will get that for free just by owning Bitcoin. But that’s not all. Paul has figured out a way to finance new forks. I believe this will trigger a new season of fork innovations. Basically fork wars 2.0 only this time it’s based around experimentation and innovation instead of outright kill Bitcoin. Institutions have been all the craze recently but they have never been the source of crypto's biggest expansions. The people who built this industry were. The Cryptographers, the hackers, the builders and the cypherpunks. Everyone is focusing on @MicroStrategy selling Bitcoin, meanwhile the upcoming eCash hard fork from @truthcoin is being wildly underestimated. Technically, the idea of improving bitcoins mechanical utility is appealing but the event itself is also financially dramatic inducing a huge wealth effect for a whole new generation of Bitcoin holders and it may remind the market who actually drives innovation in this industry. Every major crypto boom began when a small group of weird, intelligent, highly-convicted people challenged the status quo and built something new. And while everyone thinks the next bull market comes from Wall Street, I think much more poetically it comes from the same place every other one did: The real Bitcoiners. Anyway, the interview is linked below. I highly recommend you watch it and I’ll be writing my thesis that goes over wealth effects, network effects, financial incentives, game theory and how this all spills over into a bitcoin and crypto bullrun like we’ve never seen before. youtu.be/TMEtLaz1KW0

Twitter Space in 82 mins! Featuring me! Bring your questions / complaints As always, it will be recorded, & uploaded to our new YouTube -- youtube.com/@ecashdotcom as well as eCash.com

Horseshoe Theory

We are bringing everything possible with Ethereum to Litecoin with a drivechain.

ECASH is basically Bitcoin, except it has drivechains Which means there cannot be a successor, because any "successful blockchain" will just be another ECASH drivechain This used to be the vision for Bitcoin, but since they have abandoned all rationality, ECASH will be the last money of the world

.@Truthcoin spitting fire about $BTC Bitcoin Lightning Network.

THE #BITCOIN FORK THAT STEALS FROM SATOSHI eCash founder @truthcoin is cutting Satoshi's holdings on his new fork. Here he defends it. We discuss: ⚡️ Why all BTC forks disrespect Satoshi ⚡️ The negative community reaction ⚡️ Why Satoshi might believe in eCash Watch 👇

Shorting Lightning

Today -- Twitter space -- slightly later -- 5 PM to 6 PM Possibly extending to 6:30

$ecash to one gazillion

Below, I present "SimplePool" -- v 0.1 A key Bitcoin problem is **mining centralization** -- both the centralization itself -- but (more importantly) the misplaced FUD about it. Poor thought leadership, has derailed the mining conversation, as well as other much more important mission critical Bitcoin projects. This **disturbing lack of honesty**, may even kill off the BTC project as a whole -- eventually. Anyway, to fix that, I proposed that we create: 1. open source **pool** software, maintained as a community project 2. open source **pool hopper** software -- so that Hashers can just point their hash at the Pool Hopper -- which will automatically give them the best price, the healthiest blocks, w/ the least censorship 3. an incentive compatible, scalable, safe, non-custodial way for small miners (up to 8 billion individual miners) to safely collect $ from a pool We have now shipped a **preliminary** version, of this. It is brand new -- but let me give you an idea of where it is going. Important: I do **not** think this software will ever replace today's existing pools. Pools are **brands** -- so Foundry, Luxor etc aren't going anywhere. And they collect $ based on their **reputation**. But --hopefully-- we can (eventually) make the SimplePool software so good -- that it takes the software maintenance problem off of their hands. While also increasing overall pool competitiveness. Especially if we obsessively focus on revenue maximization (which we will). This is an effective way to punish censorship -- if a pool censors for too long, it will be starved of $ and hashrate. It is also an effective way to recover from a situation where there is only 1 pool (or only 2 pools or 0 pools) -- since [1] the open source pool software makes it easy to create a new pool, and [2] the hopper will automatically feed hash to this new pool (if it pays extra high $ "introductory rate" PPS). In general, we do not want "closed source" software in Bitcoin. Instead we want openness and transparency. ---- Unfortunately, most of the Bitcoin dev industry is lazy / corrupt. Most of their time is spent conspiring, to form monopolist guilds -- so as to further enhance their collective laziness. So they have negative productivity. Basically everything you hear on Twitter / on stage at conferences / on the mailing lists (these days) is a lie -- other than that, they are really great people, I guess. Here are some examples of deranged mining beliefs: 1. Luke/Ocean's misguided abandonment of PPS. Luke believes each miner should hand-craft each block -- and not outsource this task to the pool. But he is wrong. Efficiency, specialization of labor, and accountability are --by far-- more important. There is zero conflict of interest between the pool and hasher -- both want to maximize the block's txn fee revenue. So the whole issue is a total waste of everyone's time, and an enormous source of confusion -- all to prop up Luke's misguided pet project, Ocean. 2. Worse than that, a large portion of the bitcoin-dev mailing list believes that up is down. According to them, any extra $ flowing to miners -- (merged mining, heat reuse, business side deals [ercot credits]) is misinterpreted as "changing mining incentives". But that is wrong. The truth is: it has always been possible (and desirable) to pay miners $. We can pay them extra fees, or we can have a business contract with them, or an enemy could "bribe" them (etc). Satoshi invented merged mining, and was an ardent believer of the (common sense) idea that miners should make as much $ as possible. This keeps them loyal to us -- the users. 3. Most of the claims made by Statum V2 are untrue. Also, that project has been active for like 7 years ... why isn't it done yet?? More details below.