Met @StevenOgg today, at @comconliverpool with @RevDead2 #GTA

I must apologise for the political tweets of late. I'm a horror gamer, I want to talk about that, but my country is rapidly descending into 1984. I cannot stay silent when people are losing rights to a tyrannical government.

Having attended our inquiry hearings, spoken with so many survivors, read our report? I have never been more convinced that the very worst rape gang offenders should not be deported. A Restore British Government, with the British people’s approval, will put them to death.

The ban on social media for children under 16 is an idea that has merits. But the way it is being done is simply a way to force everyone, including adults, to identify themselves online, creating the most powerful surveillance and censorship architecture in human history.

Not sure prison time is a suitable punishment…

🚨NEW: The rape gang inquiry, carried out by Rupert Lowe, mentions the NHS recording genital injuries, STIs, and pregnancies in children as young as 11, then discharging them back to their abusers the same night

The cabbage was better. Cabbages are incapable of lying.

RT @NatalieGABand: “A social media ban is good for kids! They’ll read more!” Same person in 6-8 months: Why is the weather app asking me f…

Classic narcissistic dictator behaviour

Check out some early explorations on how #Spyro might evolve to take on new challenges in #ARealmBeyond

Surely that’s illegal?

If Digital ID is so safe and secure, why would MPs and members of the Royal Family need exemptions?

No. You’re the one making people unhappy, you insufferable cunt.

just drive through it you thick cunts, why does everyone stop?😂😂

SHOCKING 😱 — A British man put on a full burqa and walked past police officers to demonstrate a loophole in facial recognition and stop-and-search enforcement. He revealed anyone wearing a burqa in the UK gets the “Infinite Freedom Glitch.”

Just don’t comply with it, let Keir Starmer rage and cry. Wait for him to be voted out and then laugh at him.

Happy birthday, Jürgen 🎂

The Left is pushing for identification to use the internet while pushing for no identification to vote. Think about that.

I’m actually a child online safety expert and was one of the pioneers in this space with Club Penguin and so I feel uniquely positioned to critique this. The groomer problem is real but it’s also vastly overstated. The far larger issue we saw at Penguin was suicidality or reports of sexual abuse in the home. There is no solution for lazy/bad parenting. You can implement all the ID laws you want but if parents are going to just hand kids their phones unlocked, those kids will have access to all the same things the parents have unfettered. What I found is that these draconian safety laws actually make it harder to be an honest operator of kids apps because on one hand it’s so much legal risk and so much user friction that it simply becomes uninvestible as a business. Parents will just lie to let their kids use the unfettered internet. For example, I have a friend who works in mobile gaming who has two kids, one above and one below the age limit but separated by just 2 yrs, and the two wanted to play and chat together on Roblox - which is reasonable. To do this, he just verified that his younger kid is old enough for the chat feature when he’s not. This happens all the time and will happen with these laws to. How far do we want to go with this? Scan the face of the user in real-time to make sure it’s not a kid using the device? We could do that but it feels like a massive unwanted intrusion of privacy. That’s how you know this law isn’t about kids. COPPA and GDPR-K and so forth already make it illegal to allow chat and other grooming vectors to kids. What’s really being done here is trying to eliminate online anonymity. And this is a far bigger issue that goes to core speech rights because if you cannot criticize the govt anonymously and if wrong speech is a crime then it becomes easy to identify all the detractors of the govt in power, and ban, fine or jail them for speech crimes. Starmer has already been doing this and he wants to do it at a much bigger scale. Starmer won’t even acknowledge the problem of actual grooming gangs in Britain’s neighborhoods but he’s worried about online grooming? No he’s not, and this hypocrisy gives away the game. What he wants is to kill online anonymity so he can enforce censorship of his unpopular policies. No politician should have this power.

Nigga you already have lower approval ratings than Hitler at the end of World War 2, why are you still actively trying to piss people off still.

I’ve been making YouTube videos since I was 14 years old and it’s because of that that I am where I am today. But let’s be real: this is really just about forcing through Digital ID. UK Gov tried before and public revolted, U-turning and making it optional. This time, they’re forcing it through using child safety as a smokescreen.