Joined March 2020
- Tweets 4,666
- Following 292
- Followers 194
- Likes 15,052
70 Photos and videos
Pinned Tweet
5 Aug 2024
The left radical remains mired in the puerile, wishful Law of the Heart;
The bourgeois remains repressed, in bad conscience;
Only the fascist is a whole man.
1
5
7,798
โIf only Remus had been forewarned, resurgent Troy might not have avenged itself on the Danaansโ.
4
โGolly โฆ itโs almost as though the radical right is just โฆ right, and the word โideologyโ is applicable only to the rest of the spectrum ๐ฎโ
Fascism is just authentic, unsentimental, lucidly positivistic sociology,
9
Donโt look in anger; look forwards with rage.
#Belfast #NorthernIreland
111
Liberalism is driven by its internal logic to marginalize and pathologise men *for having veridical perceptions about the nature of external reality, and drawing logical implications from them.*
Does that sound like a sign of a viable political philosophy to you ?
45
Racism is a univocal concept.
It makes no more sense to distinguish it from โracialismโ than it does to distinguish existing from subsisting.
x is a racist if and only if x believes that racial differences exist, and are substantial, significantly heritable, and strongly socially impactful.
As such, racism is not an ethical concept. It is not some sin against liberal dogma. It is not merely behavioral-dispositional; It has cognitive-propositional content, and hence a truth value.
Therefore, racism neither implies nor is implied by any emotional attitude towards any race, whether hate, love, or whatever.
Whining about โanti-white racismโ is liberalism. Racism is true : be racist.
#Belfast #NorthernIreland #Sudanese
1
49
Reminder : Rupert Lowe is still a civ-nat boomer Thatcherite.
No amount of radical-seeming posturing to outflank Reform changes the fact that under a Lowe government, we still get replaced.
His posturing is merely quantitative, โIโll deport even more!โ
He represents no substantial, qualitative philosophical alternative.
There is no solution until we embrace eth-nat corporatism.
Insofar as Lowe remains a Thatcherite, he remains committed to free movement of labour.
His in-group is not the British people, it is the economically servile and useful.
Hence, he is not a nationalist.
He will not deport non-whites qua non-whites, he will deport whomever he can of those not useful to capital.
Under him, non-whites will continue to immigrate legally, as well, no doubt, as illegally, and non-whites will continue to outbreed us. We still get replaced.
Even the rate wonโt slow down, since heโll only deport those illegals he can lay his hands on, primarily criminal illegals. Itโs legal replacement thatโs the real threat.
The logic of civ-nat boomer-Thatcherism implies replacement, negating nationalism in favor of an ethnically-indifferent politics of class.
#Belfast #NorthernIreland #Sudanese
79
How low does your IQ have to be for you to still not be a racist in 2026 ? Whatโs the threshold fallen to by this point?
The rightward shift of the Overton window just is the gradual filtering of racism down the IQ hierarchy.
#Belfast #NorthBelfast #NorthernIreland
1
1
824
Any form of rightism which does not call itself fascism is either :
embarrassed, inauthentic fascism in bad conscience resorting to euphemism; or
conservatism = right wing liberalism.
Fascism alone is by virtue of meaning the authentic antithesis to liberalism : the negation of liberalism in its essence.
All our social problems stem from liberalism.
No form of rightism short of fascism can resolve our social problems.
Youโll get there in the end.
#Belfast #NorthBelfast #NorthernIreland
97
What happened to @WorldbyWolf ? Iโm a bit uncomfortable about the fact that the most effective critic of Lowe and Restore just suddenly disappeared.
4
1
2
409
I swear if this guy pops up again just after the by-election, we bloody well know what happened.
80
Greek ฮฑฯ
ฮณฮฎ (light of sun, beam, ray) and Gothic augo (eye) derive from the same Aryan root.
In Greek literature, (e.g the Homeric hymn to Hermes) ฮฑฯ
ฮณฮฎ is sometimes still used for eye.
ฮฯฮธฮฑฮปฮผฯฯ appears to have been borrowed from the substrate.
The poetic uses of ฮฑฯ
ฮณฮฎ as eye might be argued to be purely metaphorical, but they could just as well show that the word long retained a deep traditional usage as eye.
The deep semantic connections of eye, light, beam, ray, sun, sun as eye, eye as beam go back to the steppe, and forth to early modernity. @Tom_Rowsell
127
Because sex is a true binary,
โx is a woman implies x is a sexual objectโ (hereafter p)
is a strong example for those who believe in essences.
โx is an objectโ means x can be the value of a variable, such that things can be predicated of x; โx is sexualโ means x can reproduce by combining genetic material with a member of the opposite sex.
โx has a heart implies x has kidneysโ admits counter-examples at boundary cases; p does not.
โx is human implies x is mortalโ is an inductive generalization; p is not.
Intersex conditions give no counter-example, since you can either deny that the sufferer is a woman, irrespective of whether he is a sexual object, or admit that he is a woman, and maintain that she is a sexual object. Either way, the conditional p holds.
Unattractive women give no counter-example, since, qua woman, x is still defined as a sexual being, irrespective of her lack of appeal relative to other women.
p is true not merely by virtue of meaning, but because real, biological sex is binary.
p is comparable to โx is blue implies x is coloredโ.
Iโm inclined to think p is analytic ร priori in spite of being more than merely conventional. We construct our class of women, construct our classes of females of other species, and note analytically that all these classes are subsets of a now constructed class of sexual objects.
Hence there must be analytic propositions that are more than merely conventional; hence there must be essences.
Some might argue p is synthetic ร priori, since p is knowable ร priori, (say to some monk whoโs never seen a woman but knows what one is), yet p is not merely linguistically trivial or conventional, like โx is a bachelor implies x is unmarriedโ. p gives real information about a real class of objects. I think synthetic ร prioricity is best rejected if possible, and I think it is possible to reject it.
Iโm not afraid of essences. I even quite like them.
1
1
129
Consider this contrast : โx is a woman implies x is a sexual objectโ (p), as opposed to โx is a rabbit implies x is a lagomorphโโ.
It is very easy to imagine a community that knows rabbits, but constructs no class of lagomorphs; it is harder to imagine a community which knows women, while being unaware of them as sexual objects.
Of course Iโm aware of the Trobrianders, who were apparently innocent of any predicate equivalent to โis a sexual objectโ in any sense like the one I used above, involving some knowledge of biological mechanisms.
As such, it is necessary to distinguish that cognitive-biological sense of being a sexual object from a phenomenological sense, as โobject of sexual desireโ. Even the Trobrianders were not innocent of that. Yet on that definition, the case for p being synthetic ร priori perhaps becomes stronger, since sexual desire is transcendental (belongs to the analytic of Dasein).
I would still want to stress that the Trobrianders are exceptional, such that p is generally understood, even if somewhat pre-thematically, by most human communities. Thatโs why p as originally understood seems like a stronger candidate for a proposition of essence than other cases of class inclusion.
105