Joined June 2012
1,111 Photos and videos
Despite considerable cultural, financial, and social momentum/support, video games have produced surprisingly few artifacts of moral or aesthetic significance.
What gaming take will you defend like this?šŸš€
17
Reject the man cave. Embrace another bedroom for more kids.
Reject the man cave. Embrace the personal library.
1
42
There's no way for this not to sound rude, but y'all need to go read an actual poem by a human. This machine poem is awful, and it's embarrassing that you like it. x.com/emollick/status/206476…
Fable: "write me a rhyming poem with six four line stanzas, each stanza removes another vowel. the first has no u, the second no u or i, etc."
7
3
22
9,696
I had this exact experience as well!
As a kid I thought ā€œtwo’s company, three’s a crowdā€ meant it’s more fun to have more people. So I’d always invite a third person along somewhere and go ā€œthree’s a crowd!ā€ Wasn’t until I was like 17 that my mom told me it’s meant to be a bad thing. Sorry I’m an extrovert at heart.
1
3
777
I know this is all engagement bait or whatever, but why does Dostoevsky always get put down as some kind of depressing nihilist, when his two most famous works are about everlasting love and the potential of mankind?
Reviving my greatest artistic creation. Tag yourself, I’m ā€œSad Hates Everyone.ā€
1
1
114
I mean the answer probably is that most people only read ā€œThe Grand Inquisitorā€ chapter but still
39
This will include papers from @SterlingCLife's own Chair of Language and Literature, Dr. @LukeBrake and familiar IFF faces @GCSalter and Elizabeth Jennings, as well as a wonderful reflective paper from Dr. Wilhelm.
Today, at 3pm (CT) some of our presenters from our Spring conference will be reprising their papers for this encore event entitled "Sterling Treasure". All are welcome to join the zoom call whether you want to hear the papers again or for the first time! facebook.com/share/17RqbYY93…
1
4
84
I do not mind the Disney Adult too much (not my cup of tea, but it seems fine). I am pretty tired of how threatening some public spaces are to my children in terms of public indecency, especially with pornographic images on t-shirts/cars.
Okay. Ban childless adults from Disney World and other kid-centric spaces and let’s have a chat. And while we’re at it, let’s talk about the number of times I’ve had to sit next to a table of adults loudly spewing profanity, which has become more common than a free bread basket.
1
1
58
This is anti-human and anti-culture and neglects the real culprit of the decline of low end dining: gigantic TVs
No one wants a romantic dinner ruined by a screaming child at the next table. According to a new survey, 75% of Americans say restaurants should offer some kind of adults-only dining experience to avoid unruly kids. That includes child-free sections, restrictions during late-night hours, and quieter dining environments focused more on the experience than family-friendly chaos.
Community note
The 75% support figure for adults-only dining is from a multi-country consumer survey across the US, Canada, UK, France, Germany, Netherlands, and Belgium—not US-only. lightspeedhq.com/news/75-of-con…
46
Luke Brake retweeted
Need the Pope to release an encyclical against Teams calls
78
5,202
32,497
613,449
Luke Brake retweeted
Church coffee hour depends on complementarity. For the parents, an Apollonian hour of conversation and swapping prayer request. BECAUSE For the kids, a Dionysian hour of donuts, running around like dervishes, and screaming.
2
7
144
7,464
Zeus, who guided men to think, who has laid it down that wisdom comes alone through suffering.
Let’s be honest. All these people upset about college students using AI are just jealous they didn’t have it when they were in college. They just want them to suffer like they did. It’s an old story: ā€œWell if I suffered, they should too.ā€ It’s also a morally repugnant position.
52
Luke Brake retweeted
We can solve the fertility crisis by showing people charts and then yelling at them for not having enough babies
54
201
3,320
80,486
Genuinely hopeful that this discourse resolves the extremely embarrassing citation bloat in academic journals. It’s unnecessary, vain, and needlessly discourages grad students.
Replying to @tdietterich @arxiv
So this means you expect every author to check every citation and make sure that every citation is real and accurate? What if it's beyond the ability of one of the authors to verify one of the citations because that citation is in a language he doesn't know or concerns technical material he doesn't understand but another author on the paper does?
Community note
Yes. Academics (like Miller himself) are responsible for the work they produce, including accurate citation practices and thorough vetting of sources. Miller’s previous and current institutions have policies about this: smith.edu/your-campus/of… college.uchicago.edu/student-servic…
37
Lots of mean stereotypes about Tech researchers getting validated rn
Replying to @octonion
No, you are supposed to obsessively check everything line by line after any of your coauthors make any update to any of your papers. Major PIs will author more than 15 papers a year with several tens of coauthors. Now they are supposed to check everything line by line at every single update without failure rate. If the failure rate of any of this is 0.5-1%, a PI who publishes 15 papers a year or more will likely be banned in a few years at best
33
Luke Brake retweeted
The reactions of many researchers on finally being held responsible for having read the very paper they submitted are... something.
352
1,185
11,846
598,598
Luke Brake retweeted
I barely survived ā€œtelling writers they have to read is gatekeeping,ā€ I don’t think I can live through ā€œtelling writers they have to write is gatekeepingā€
šŸ’ÆA lot of AI hate is thinly veiled gatekeeping.
47
2,895
25,279
434,128
Luke Brake retweeted
the real question is how often in Nolan’s Odyssey we will see Matt Damon burn thigh bones wrapped in fat for the gods
1
3
28
2,000
I guarantee you’re a better writer than ChatGPT. Never butcher your own writing or relinquish your own voice to put your name on the dead-eyed, mechanical hallucinations of a bunch of 1s and 0s. People who know good writing and AI have no trouble recognizing AI-generated garbage.
20
738
3,705
115,862
Look I know this is a tired conversation, but I am still baffled how people could have seen Rings of Power and thought "this is designed to make you hate Tolkien." It was more aligned with Tolkien's vision than Jackson's work by a country mile.
The purpose of Christopher Nolan’s take on The Odyssey is to make you hate Homer, just like The Rings of Power was designed to make you hate Tolkien. Ad fontes!
5
206