Do not use the AI's to form an opinion on BIP110. Learn from the people that support it directly and from those that oppose it. I asked @Grok a question and he only referenced two anti bip110 sources then spewed a bunch of nonsene.

Bitcoiners that signal for BIP-110 are just maxis from 2022.

BIP-110 (Reduced Data Temporary Softfork) is a proposed 1-year Bitcoin consensus soft fork. It adds temporary rules to limit arbitrary data in transactions—capping most new outputs at 34 bytes (OP_RETURN up to 83 bytes), data pushes/witness items at 256 bytes, and restricting certain Taproot features. Goal: reduce data "spam" (Ordinals, large embeds) to ease node load and refocus Bitcoin on monetary use. Pre-activation UTXOs are exempt; rules auto-expire after ~52k blocks. Signaling is live on some nodes. Full details: bip110.org and the draft BIP.

A recap of the last eight months of Bitcoin Core: ⚠️ 30 blew OP_RETURN open, 80b to 100KB. "Ethereum on Bitcoin." ❌ 30 and 30.1 could delete every wallet on the node during migration. 😱 31 reveals your IP to peers. Core is reduced to spam relay, deletion and doxxing. #BIP110

Unpopular opinion: Core isn't enabling "data use case" to support miners. Core is enabling "data use case" to weaken the monetary use case. The only use case that the banking cartel has an issue with.

Running RDTS on Bitcoin Knots version 29.3.1 on one of the two nodes that I manage as of today. Bitcoin is a monetary network, not an arbitrary data storage network.

Gold: test it, weigh it, assay it, trust the experts. Bitcoin: run a node.

Of the 130M taproot OP_IFs on-chain, 99.6% of them are hardcoded never to run. They are of the form: If 0 = 1, execute X Zero never equals one, so X is never intended to be executed If taproot is designed to execute code, OP_IF is 99.6% a system hack GitHub and plain text 👇

RDTS (BIP-110) is coming in August! Make sure you are running the latest Knots! Just say NO to spam/scams on Bitcoin! Help each other out, and feel free to reach out for assistance. github.com/bitcoinknots/bitc…

I think I’ve finally read and heard enough of the BIP-110 pro/con arguments and I just don’t find those against it very compelling at all given what it does. And I don’t think apathy is an appropriate response to the issue either. Bitcoin lives because node runners always choose

“Pruning is fine… nodes are mainly for you, not for the network.” This mindset quietly pushes Bitcoin toward centralization: let big companies and large operators run the real full archival nodes while everyone else prunes or relies on them. The hard reality in 2026 is that a regular working person already struggles to run a proper full archival node (Knots indexes ~1.18 TB on my setup). Hardware, electricity, and bandwidth aren’t trivial. Not everyone has the same economic reality. That doesn’t mean the solution is “just depend on corporations” or accept a bloated chain. BIP-110 exists precisely to keep verification accessible for normal people on modest hardware — not turn it into another luxury for those who can afford big iron. Sovereignty shouldn’t be gated by wealth. Run Knots. Support BIP-110.

Where do nodes get the initial block download from? From full archival nodes Where do nodes that were unplugged for an extended period of time get the missing blocks from? From full archival nodes Don't trust [spammers], verify.

When running nodes becomes too expensive for the average user, the decentralized p2p network will become a centralized network.

A mined Core v30 block vs A mined Knots BIP110 block

For the bitcoiners saying: "don't worry about the price, bitcoin's fundamentals haven't changed!". Sorry, it has, it's becoming a shitcoin👇👇👇

Some Bitcoiners act like this is a hard decision😂

Bitcoin’s fundamentals are under attack by Core v.30, LibreRelay, and Miner Cesspools. Bitcoin is resilient, but not invincible… we have to defend the monetary properties of the Network with best effort. Run Knots RDTS DATUM Ocean to help get Bitcoin back on track.

Run a BIP110 node if you want to keep hardware requirements low.

„The root problem with Bitcoin Core v30 is all the trust that’s required to make it work. Bitcoin Core developers must be trusted to preserve Bitcoin as peer-to-peer electronic cash, but the history of Bitcoin development is full of breaches of that trust.“ - Run @BitcoinKnots