Critics are calling progressive District Attorney Jose Garza’s policy, which requires all officer involved shooting cases to go to a grand jury, outrageous. It comes after reports that the 3 officers who heroically shot and killed the Austin mass shooter would likely face a grand jury.
This never implied that the District Attorney was ever pursuing criminal charges. Rather, it is a requirement for all officer-involved shooting cases to be presented to a grand jury in Travis County under the progressive DA Jose Garza (and in many other Texas jurisdictions that I have covered).
I just spoke with the attorney hired by the Union to represent the Austin PD officers if the case goes to a grand jury. DA Garza said his office is not pursuing criminal charges and called any counterclaims politically motivated. However, he did not say whether the case will still be presented to a grand jury, as per policy, and the union also remains unsure. The DA office has not responded to my emails requesting clarification.
But it is now raising questions about the bigger picture—whether this blanket policy should even be in place. Attorney Doug O’Connell explains that DA Jose Garza instituted this policy after taking office in 2021, reportedly at the direction of Wren Collective, a criminal-justice reform group that provides financial support to progressive prosecutors. He also claims there is no legal basis for the policy and notes that it adds stress to an already stressful job for officers. “Every time they are dispatched to a violent criminal call, they have to be thinking, I could end up dead or indicted,” he said.