“if a hospital has made it this long despite all of Trump’s actions and still is offer GAC to minors, then they’re not exactly “risk averse”.” This is a good point. Basically every time over the last year and a half that the federal government does something seemingly big regarding gender transition procedures that could put hospitals at risk, people are eager to say hospitals will just stop gender transition procedures all together to avoid the risks. But like, if they’ve made in this long and still haven’t stopped despite all the big risks, then they’re clearly not risk averse.

Maybe in the UK, but countries with self ID are still very far behind and will have a much harder time getting there, while some like Australia are going in the exact opposite direction. Even in the UK there’s still more battles that need to be won such as stopping the ‘conversion therapy’ ban etc. The battle is still far from over worldwide…

I think it’s important to note that medical gender transition procedures (for kids and adults) have been heavily restricted in Singapore for many years. So it’s not like they strongly supported it like some other countries but then suddenly changed their mind.

The Pediatric Endocrine Society addresses the panel at the Pediatric Academic Societies. 2 2=5

For those who thought PAS might be becoming more tolerant of different views:

The process is punishment. Even though this time this panel may be lucky, the next time another organizer may think twice before green lighting such a panel. When Erin Reed made the post, the punishment for scientific inquiry started. If you support academic freedom and integrity, you should condemn Erin Reed.