Lies of Candace Owens. This will be my thread 🧵 of her lies. It's in no particular order & I will continually add to it as things get revealed.

These people walk among us. 🤦🏻‍♀️ This is what happens when you let low IQ people enter the truther groups. They buy any conspiraslop that anyone with a mic says. They don't even realize how crazy they sound. 🤦🏻‍♀️

Please protect @MrsErikaKirk from this lunatic. Please seek to have her barred from entering the court house. @AndrewKolvet @BlakeSNeff @TPUSA @TPUSARapidRep @FBIDirectorKash @FBI_Response

Listen to Andrew Tate talk about who killed @charliekirk11 , but really he just defends @RealCandaceO. Listen to him blame racism & misogyny for why she is not taken seriously. You know it's not because her theories are crazy or lack evidence. Nope, if you don't take her seriously, it's because she's a black woman. Who knew he was such a defender of black women? 🤯 He says "she's right on the f'n money." But somehow, I can't picture him watching Candace for over an hour, 4 days a week, or any day of the week. I just feel like he's lying. Actually, I know, know he's lying and unlike Candace I got the receipt.

💥NEW: Stephen A. Smith: “I would give anything to be able to say something definitively in Karmelo Anthony’s defense. If there was a shred of innocence to the incident itself, I would say so. I don’t want to see another black young man going to jail.” “But I don’t give a d*mn about what your race or ethnicity is. Just because you’re white and young doesn’t mean you deserve to be m*rdered. And just because you’re black and young … doesn’t give you a license to m*rder someone.” “That’s what happened.”

So does this mean Erika is no longer mossad? 🤔 Or does it mean Charlie wasn't divorcing Erika for being pro-Israel?🤔 Or does it mean Erika didn't take out Charlie because he was leaving the pro-Israel cause?🤔 Or does it mean, Candace is full of 💩 & makes up stupid 💩 when her ratings are low? 🤔 Hmmm, the world may never know...

Congratulations. You managed to build an entire conspiracy theory from a facial expression while simultaneously misspelling the name of the person you were using as evidence. My name is James Kaddis. Not “Kaddish.” Ordinarily, that would not matter much. But in this case, it matters because you were not even primarily attacking me. You were trying to use me as a prop to attack Erika. You built an entire narrative around what you imagined I was thinking and feeling, then presented your imagination as evidence. That is a level of confidence completely detached from competence. You also claimed I was sitting right next to her. Wrong again. I was sitting in my own studio, in an entirely different location. So let’s review. Wrong name. Wrong location. Wrong conclusion. Yet somehow we are supposed to trust your interpretation of my internal thoughts, emotions, and motives. You could not correctly identify who I was or where I was, but you apparently believe you can identify what was happening inside my head. That is not analysis. That is imagination pretending to be insight. The truth is simple: you have no idea what I was thinking, no idea what I was feeling, and no idea what was happening off camera. Yet you presented your speculation as fact because facts were apparently less useful to your narrative than imagination. I was not annoyed with Erika. I was not frustrated with Erika. I was not sitting there thinking, “Here we go again.” The truth is exactly the opposite. I was emotional because I care deeply about my friend. A widow. A woman whose husband was murdered while faithfully serving his nation. A man whose courage, sacrifice, and leadership changed lives across this country. And a woman who stood faithfully beside him, carried burdens most people will never understand, and had far more to do with that impact than shallow critics will ever comprehend. What makes your post especially revealing is that instead of showing compassion toward a widow carrying that kind of pain, you turned her grief into content. You needed a villain for your story, so you invented one. You needed evidence, so you invented that too. And somehow a completely fabricated interpretation of my facial expression became part of the script. You turned the pain of a widow into content, invented motives for people you have never met, and called it analysis. That is not exposing anyone. It is exposing yourself. Because when someone gets the observable facts wrong while remaining completely certain about the unobservable facts, that is usually a sign they are not pursuing truth. They are protecting a narrative. One final piece of advice. I noticed your request for help regarding people supposedly trying to shut down your channel. Respectfully, I think you’re looking in the wrong direction. Your greatest threat is not the people criticizing you. Your greatest threat is the habit of presenting fiction as fact. When a person gets the name wrong, the location wrong, the circumstances wrong, and then confidently claims to know the thoughts and motives of complete strangers, the problem is not opposition. The problem is credibility. And no critic can damage credibility nearly as effectively as the person destroying it himself. If your channel is struggling, I would spend less time worrying about enemies and more time worrying about accuracy. You managed to misspell the witness, misidentify the location, invent the testimony, and then present the whole thing as evidence. That is not journalism. That is not discernment. That is fan fiction with a confidence problem. The irony is that the only conspiracy here is the one you created between your keyboard and your imagination.

Putin kissed the Koran that Kadyrov gave him & said it’s illegal to burn the Quran or mock Mohammed. The Russian Orthodox Church he controls says it has a spiritual duty to defend Islam. I would add that there’s an equally big red pill: Jeffrey Epstein’s links to Russia, which far outweigh anything connecting him to Mossad or the CIA.

This is so good. I love Zach.

Never forget

.@patrickbetdavid should really stop speaking on things to where he doesn’t even listen to entire conversations and then asks grok to analyze basic information for him. Like …….. he’s doing this more often; spreading lies and misinformation mostly because Vinny is retarded and he takes Vinnys word. Once again, Andrew never said it was AI. Him saying they were TROLLING with the audio is different than saying “we were trolling and used AI to do so.” Which he obviously never said. (This is why I said before, that Andrew should just stop talking) Are people becoming dumber? Stop using grok to analyze freaking conversations. It’s not your conscience and it should not replace your own human intelligence and objectivity.

Tucker admits he was visited a by a demon that left claw marks on his back. Since then he went pro-sharia law, pro Islamic Regime, lies & contradicts himself & is now an agent of destruction to destroy Trump, TPUSA, destroy Evangelical Christianity etc. He is not a builder, he has become a destroyer & a divider which shows he is operating under a satanic spirit.

Jon Lewis on Candace's knack for reality distortion... When Laura Loomer reported on George's wrecked truck, Candace denied that they'd ever owned the vehicle. Jon says he almost believed her before he remembered, "wait a second! I rode in that truck with George Farmer"

Easily the most ironic Freudian slip I’ve ever seen. We don’t know but we knowww. 👀

Smart dad. Adorable kids too.