Joined October 2014
110 Photos and videos
I didn't die! Against all odds, I emerged victorious with a score of 2,573,790 a new PR. I've been waiting for a score like this for ages. Can't believe I finally hit it βœ–οΈπŸŽ² @dontdiegame
1
7
120
There's something really unique about @dontdiegame Seriously every single run I get has a crazy intense moment. The swings of emotion are HUGE in Don't Die That's what makes the game fun and stupidly addicting. Your strategy creates your luck and it goes crazy mode
3
3
8
230
You too can have moments like this. In fact it happens REGULARLY. Come try Don't Die and feel the rush for yourself - Tournament Season 1 is currently live with over $5k USDC in the prize pool
1
1
74
I have 30 more videos just like this, and that's just the stuff I recorded. Incredibly exciting battles. Things that break the game. 10,000 poison, infinite block, 1 million points, and more and more and more Could bull post all day - but gameplay is what makes games exciting. Come experience it for yourself
2
51
I've never felt so much tension in a game as when I was navigating this @dontdiegame 9x $10 run. What a rush
2
1
7
162
But it's the culmination of all your risks, all your decisions that lead you to that final precipice. Should you lock in your shot at $90 or should you risk it all for glory I chose safety. But I regret that choice tbh. I should have rewound the battle to try for more points.
1
2
61
There is no other game out there right now that gives you this tension. It's only possible with a game of skill and decisions that lasts more than 10 minutes. The culmination of the journey is what creates that tension. It's the build, the growth, the volatility, the close calls, the risk. It's not a simple rock paper scissors, and it's not trying to be It's dice building - your decisions create your fate
1
4
81
nickmetzler.eth (βœ–οΈ,🎲) retweeted

6
6
18
1,111
Players always need to feel Hope and Agency when playing a game. Super critical I tried to put this into every decision point in @dontdiegame. It's a dice game, where your decisions matter Thanks for having me on @GamingDailyx, was a pleasure!
Nick points to hope and agency as the core of a great game. Players stay when they feel they can win and their decisions matter. That’s what brings people back for another match.
4
244
You have one job: Don't Die. Play free now, so that you won't die in the Season 1 USDC Tournament, Feb 23rd
You have one job: Don’t Die. Don’t Die is a casual yet strategic roguelike played with Dice. Defeat monsters, upgrade your dice, and build game-breaking combos that defy the odds. But most importantly, Don’t Die. Win up to 10x in 30 mins or less🧡:
1
4
147
Easy to dismiss it when quite literally 95% failed. The data shows, inarguably, that the people don't want web3 gaming But they don't want web3 gaming as it was previously designed. Most of the designs of yesteryear were unsustainable ponzinomics with business models incompatible with the realities of game design. Luke from pixels wrote a great article about this. That doesn't mean it's completely dead though, just that it didn't work in the way everyone initially expected. I know of several models that are currently working. Hell, I'm working on 2 of them and they're both super different from each other. Data shows you what has already happened, but not what was missing. For that, you need insight. That said, haseeb is right that it wasn't regulation that killed this past slew of games. Frankly, it was the requirement to include a token. That was really stupid. You should only launch a token if you absolutely need one for the system to work. Most web3 games will not need this. NFTs in games work great, just in specific situations, not everything. That's why I'm still here, and building @dontdiegame and @glitchbombgame because I'll show you the answers with gameplay rather than write articles about them (no hate to article writing, I just dislike writing)
With all due respect to Chris, I completely disagree with this take. Chris argues that "web3," particularly crypto-powered gaming and media, failed due to scams and regulation, and that better regulation will unlock these non-financial cases. OK, think about this for a second. Does this pass the smell test? Do you think web3 gaming failed because of Gary Gensler? Do you think web3 media plays failed because the scammers crowded out the honest media innovators? Really? If this is true, why didn't they kill financial crypto, which had WAY more of both? Financial use cases were right in the crosshairs of the regulatory harassment, and they also attracted way more scams. Why shouldn't we instead accept the more obvious answer: non-financial use cases for crypto have failed because no one wants them. Let's just admit it. They were bad products. They failed the market test. It was not Gensler or SBF or Terra that caused these things to fail, it was that no one wanted any of it. Pretending otherwise is cope. Enormous sums of capital and talent explored these ideas, and we should acknowledge what we learned. That lesson is not "if we just had better laws, then finally people would finally be using decentralized Spotify" or whatever. Call a spade a spade. Every single use case in crypto that has worked at scale has been financial in nature. 2008: Bitcoin - non-sovereign store of value 2014: Tether - stablecoins 2015: Ethereum - programmable money 2017: ICOs - capital formation 2018: Prediction markets (Augur, later Polymarket) 2020: DeFi - literally finance is in the name 2021: NFTs - non-fungible financial assets (to the extent they worked) 2024: RWAs (the year BUIDL took off) All this stuff was adopted bottoms-up. We as investors discovered that people wanted to do these things with crypto. The web3 consumer stuff, on the other hand, was primarily conjured up by investors and pitch decks, ZIRP accelerationism, and "wouldn't it be crazy if" blog posts. This was the opposite of the "what smart people are doing on their weekends" thesis. In fact, if you go back to the Ethereum white paper from 2014, almost every single Ethereum use case Vitalik describes is financial in nature: token issuance, stablecoins, derivatives, on-chain treasuries/DAOs, on-chain savings, insurance, price feeds, escrow, gambling, prediction markets. It's all in there. This is nothing to be ashamed of. Finance is almost 10% of GDP. It's an enormous part of the world economy, and banks are some of the lowest NPS score companies in the world. People hate their banks and the outdated financial architectures their money runs on. It's literally why Bitcoin was created. There is so much to innovate in the realm of finance, and I truly believe we are only at the beginning of that displacement. You don't need to assume anything more to project the next 10x in crypto. The old saying goes "crypto will do to finance what the Internet did to every other industry." I respect Chris's optimism. But 18 years in, we should not be propagating this meme about consumer web3 use cases as though they're inevitable. If you are hanging around the rim hoping that crypto is going to disrupt media and gaming, you should know the history and look at it with clear eyes. Now if you as a founder believe that despite that, you know the secret to cracking this market--I respect that, and I certainly don't begrudge anyone to follow their convictions. But I think it's important that investors be honest that all the evidence points the other way.
1
7
389
Excited to be joining @cartridge_gg and Tarrence as an advisor to bring this vision to the masses. @glitchbombgame is just the beginning
0/ We spend more waking hours in digital spaces than physical ones. In those spaces we’re guests not owners. We build identities on accounts we don’t control. We create value that flows to a few digital landlords. We have the tools to take it back. Guest thread by @tarrence
1
8
472
Dice are loaded Time to roll some crits
πŸ”Ίszn loading… stay alive fr
1
4
97