I recall when the old Golf Advisor lists used to get universally panned on here.
Just a reminder, we are not normal golfers. Most normal golfers love trees, conditions and the deal of the day.
Those of us on Golf X go a layer or 14 deeper on this. For us, the authorities for best courses are Golf Magazine, Golf Digest, Golfweek and Top100Courses. Each ranking has it's own merits and detractions.
I'd love to get to a place where the golfing masses are educated to the point where those lists, and the Golf Advisor ranking, or the google ratings, are one. But we're not there yet.
I love the idea of everyday golfer input like the old Golf Advisor. I would use it to check on course conditions prior to booking rounds. But everyday golfer input into actual “top in state, region, suburbs, etc.” lists leads to bad output like this.
This is a best of list from a Chicago suburbs based newspaper that solicited votes from readers. There’s probably 20 (or even more) public courses in the area I would suggest before those on this list.