Hater of all things yeet

Joined March 2021
122 Photos and videos
Mik retweeted
If you’re a parent who wanted the government to ban social media for kids what was stopping you from doing your job as a parent?
51
127
1,184
14,672
Mik retweeted
My 17-year-old daughter: “I’m confused. We’ve always been taught not to share personal information or anything that identifies us online because it isn’t safe. Now they want us to do exactly that to access social media.”
814
6,668
36,577
798,279
"90% support it" Yeah in the same way dictators "win" elections - its a made up stat; the survey was publicly available and there was NO way to say no lol
Jun 14
People will attack this policy, but after extensive government consultation, 90% of the parents of under-16s support it. They have watched social media consume huge portions of their children’s lives, so have a very different perspective. Social media amplifies narcissism, materialism, envy and division at an age when young minds are still developing. It keeps children trapped in a digital ecosystem designed to maximise engagement at the expense of real-world experiences, time outdoors, hobbies, independence, and learning how to socialise and build genuine friendships. Perhaps most damaging of all, it encourages constant comparison. Children are measuring themselves against carefully curated versions of other people’s lives every hour of every day. It creates feelings of inadequacy and anxiety on a scale that older generations simply never experienced. There will be much outrage about this, but this policy is truly about protecting children, and anyone who cares about the future of society should support it.
Community note
Said consultation didn't have an option for those who don't support it, only five different versions of yes and "don't know" x.com/i/status/20665…
85
2,954
25,508
441,531
Mik retweeted
It is not an under sixteen ban. It is the universal enforcement of digital identity required to use social media. Do these puppet dullards really think we don't see what they are doing? Or do they just not care anymore?
BREAKING: Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has announced a social media ban for under-16s. Live updates: trib.al/AaXv2Tr
22
96
405
8,950
Mik retweeted
the depressing thing about this all is unironically every 40 year old is committed that this is an incredible win and hasn't thought about it in the slightest nor noticed ID data being stolen en masse from verification services
BREAKING: Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has announced a social media ban for under-16s. Live updates: trib.al/AaXv2Tr
12
78
844
8,705
Sir Lord goes INSANE
The Aardman founders have been knighted ⚔️ They are now Sir Peter Lord and Sir David Sproxton
2
28
Reminder. A social media ban was NOT in Labour's 2024 Manifesto. Neither was Digital I.D. Oh, or State Suicide. Or binning the two child benefit cap.
24
407
2,245
17,364
Mik retweeted
The Royal Society for Blind Children and the National Deaf Children's Society have both come out against the Starmer social media ban. "Internet bad" is a trendy, upper-middle-class opinion for people with extracurricular budgets that ignores legions of people who rely on it.
79
2,523
7,474
166,795
🚨UPDATE : Not only may Keir Starmers social media ban be in breach of Article 8 it may now also be in breach of Article 10 of the ECHR. And yes the ECHRs rights extends to children.
🚨 BREAKING : Could Keir Starmer’s under-16 social media ban breach Article 8 of the ECHR? Some people have claimed that the ban will directly breach privacy laws/rights that come from the European Convention on Human Rights.
232
4,712
16,524
323,994
Mik retweeted
UK ‘public consultation’ on the social media ban notice how they didn’t give the option to say no? Illusion of democracy.
61
828
4,647
54,206
🚨🇬🇧 BREAKING: Petition to stop the social media ban. kids are having none of it. Let’s get some signatures on this petition to stop the social media ban. Anyone with half a brain knows this isn’t about child safety it’s about sneaking in Digital ID through the back door. Please sign and share 🙏🏼 🇬🇧🫡❤️ Petition: Do not ban social media for under 16s petition.parliament.uk/petit…
243
1,996
4,237
97,790
Mik retweeted
yeah so this is a social media ban for everyone in the uk btw. unless you want to hand a copy of your personal identification to the company behind every app you use
🚨 SUMMARY: The UK's social media ban for children from early 2027: - "User-to-user" apps where people create, share and interact with content (e.g. TikTok, Instagram, Snapchat, YouTube, X, Facebook) will be banned for under-16s - WhatsApp, Signal and YouTube Kids will be exempt - Under-16s will also be banned from livestreaming, messaging strangers on gaming apps like Discord and using disappearing messages - 16 and 17 year olds will face nightly social media curfews and limits on infinite scrolling with more details next month - AI "romantic companion" chatbots will be banned for under-18s - Adults can still access social media through age checks like facial recognition, digital IDs, passports and credit cards
29
839
8,465
144,649
Mik retweeted
People *need* to understand this: the under-16 bans hit adults too. Whether you’re 15 or 55, your ability to speak freely and anonymously online is at risk. This. Isn’t. Just. About. Teens.
JUST IN: UK Government clarifies adults will still be able to use social media by verifying their identities with digital IDs, facial recognition, passports and credit cards.
191
2,747
14,408
169,618
Mik retweeted
“Giving children their childhood back?” So reopening the 2,000 youth clubs closed under neoliberalism? The 1,000 children’s centres? Recreating the 10,000 playing fields lost? Or the 800 playgrounds lost in the last 10 years? The 1,000 libraries? The after-school clubs closed?
We are banning social media access for under 16s. These days kids must find their feet in a world where technology intrudes into every area of their life. I just can’t let that go on anymore. So we’re giving children their childhoods back.
Community note
The UK Government's 'careful review' of the research found a small correlation between children's use of social media and wellbeing, but no evidence of a causal effect: gov.uk/government/pub… assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/696e0b46…
38
2,481
14,592
208,059
Mik retweeted
Why did Spain accept this 😭😭
81
1,386
48,191
508,144
i don't even care if you think this is right or wrong, this is political suicide
BREAKING: Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has announced a social media ban for under-16s. Live updates: trib.al/AaXv2Tr
63
292
6,495
86,193
Mik retweeted
I’m helping a disabled client verify his age with @PlayStation @Sony. He can't use their standard methods, and they have ignored requests for reasonable adjustments under the Equality Act 2010. This breaks UK law. @Ofcom please look into this or I'll take legal action.
So, @PlayStation is basically unusable for me now. The UK Online Safety Act means I have to hand over a face scan or government ID just to use basic features. My PAYG mobile isn't accepted, and I’m not giving biometrics to a company with a history of massive data breaches. #Ps5
61
749
8,173
471,002
Hilarious thing is that if this was for under-13s it would be far more reasonable, banning fifteen year olds from watching youtube is mental 😭😭😭
We are banning social media access for under 16s. These days kids must find their feet in a world where technology intrudes into every area of their life. I just can’t let that go on anymore. So we’re giving children their childhoods back.
Community note
The UK Government's 'careful review' of the research found a small correlation between children's use of social media and wellbeing, but no evidence of a causal effect: gov.uk/government/pub… assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/696e0b46…
22
196
2,934
47,880
Mik retweeted
The last sentence is the real meat and potatoes of this. What's being promoted as a 'social media ban for children', is really an ID check for every adult.
🚨 SUMMARY: The UK's social media ban for children from early 2027: - "User-to-user" apps where people create, share and interact with content (e.g. TikTok, Instagram, Snapchat, YouTube, X, Facebook) will be banned for under-16s - WhatsApp, Signal and YouTube Kids will be exempt - Under-16s will also be banned from livestreaming, messaging strangers on gaming apps like Discord and using disappearing messages - 16 and 17 year olds will face nightly social media curfews and limits on infinite scrolling with more details next month - AI "romantic companion" chatbots will be banned for under-18s - Adults can still access social media through age checks like facial recognition, digital IDs, passports and credit cards
423
2,630
13,996
642,607
Mik retweeted
that’s the question isn’t it. what WILL she do? there are no youth clubs for her to attend. food, cinema tickets, any sort of third space activity is all too expensive. their parents are underpaid, saturday jobs don’t exist any more, children have truly been abandoned by the govt
BBC: “What was your screen time?” Student: “Nine hours.” BBC: “You’re gong to have a lot more time to fill. What will you do?” Student: “Stare at a wall.”
590
16,932
160,835
3,571,247