that's exactly my position in this prior piece for WIRED, in which I cover exploitative and unscientific "treatments" for autism, ranging from dietary interventions to seriously dangerous things like chelation and bleach enemas
one of the points I keep trying to make in the LC space, though, is that the mind-body stuff simply DOES NOT get the same treatment as, say, cranio-cervical surgeries (!!!!) as an intervention for ME/CFS, or hEDS (which one ME/CFS advocate, Edwards, refers to as "being a bit bendy," I'd love to see him write an op-ed defending that! lol)
anyways, that's a wildly dangerous surgery, surely as dangerous as a mind-body therapy, but at best the skepticism is gentle, there isn't a mass movement trying to destroy the exploitative neurosurgeons offering these extremely expensive surgeries, or hounding the patients who get them, or who claim improvements from them
and that, I argue, is because such surgeries (and such recovery stories) don't threaten the legitimacy of the illness
wired.com/2015/04/alternativ…