Are migrants taking our jobs? Between 2022 and 2025 the statistics show that 927k additional in employment. Of those, Indians in employment increased by 337k, blacks increased by 544k, all non white combined increased by 1157000. Whites decreased by 219k ons.gov.uk/employmentandlabo…

Let's build the full picture of what the UK government has announced this month. Every device in the country: scanned for nudity. Signal: ordered to build a backdoor. Every stolen iPhone: remotely disabled by law enforcement on request. children: banned from disappearing messages, VPNs, livestreaming, romantic AI. though Bluesky is exempted actually. and now: every adult who wants to use social media must verify their identity with a passport, credit card, facial recognition, or government digital ID. Your face. to tweet. A registry of every adult in the country who uses the internet, tied to their real identity, held by platforms that have already sold data to Cambridge Analytica, already been fined billions for privacy violations, already shared data with governments on request. Scans your device. Knows your face. Knows your real name behind every account. Can disable your phone. Has a backdoor into your messages. This is not about children.

1) it is realy about forcing adults to ID online so they can be de-anonymized and scare them out of dissent. 2) social media is beneficial for children overall 3) it is parents responsibility not government 4) it is about controlling what children see politically and socially

Bad parenting isn't a justification for mass surveillance.

The rigged consultation. ⬇️

Why does London price squeeze high-skilled taxpayers into shared flats or out to the commuter belt, while handing subsidised homes to low-skilled, welfare-dependent migrants from incompatible cultures in prime locations? Baffling. Enraging. Awful for growth & attracting talent.

The council house swapping Facebook groups and websites are very eye-opening. There are 6- and 7-bedroom properties on offer in Zone 2 at ~£750 a month. Private rents for similar properties would be £6,000 . Enormous subsidies are being distributed in the worst possible way.

These are a selection of taxpayer-funded charities pushing to bring more migrants into your communities and how much they received from the government: Action Foundation: £1,130,580 Asylum Aid: £837,000 Asylum Welcome: £2,881,770 Belong Nottingham: £446,910 Breaking Barriers: £3,037,800 Bristol Refugee Rights: £510,260 British Red Cross Society: £417,960,000 British Refugee Council: £41588,000 Celebrating Sanctuary: £205,420 City of Sanctuary Sheffield: £574,680 Herts Welcomes Refugees: £47,729 Indo American Refugee and Migrant Organisation: £1,112,460 Kanlungan Filipino Consortium: £511,140 Kent Refugee Action Network: £397,340 Learn English at Home: £172,570 Migrant Help: £153,592,000 Migrants Organise Ltd: £405,130 Migrant Training Company: £2,119,910 Nottingham and Nottinghamshire Refugee Forum: £2,347,000 Music Action International: £84,240 Peterborough Asylum and Refugee Community Association: £1,661,870 Portsmouth City of Sanctuary: £38,170 Refugee Action: £16,765,000 Refugee Education UK: £700,190 Refugee and Migrant Justice: £3,196,440 Refugee Resource: £444,680 South London Refugee Association: £505,270 The Coventry Refugee and Migrant Centre: £4,538,710 Welsh Refugee Council: £4,819,990 York City of Sanctuary: £120,000 These organisations should be stripped of their funding and banned.

Fantastic overview for @owenjonesjourno The Belfast Attack Exposes Britain’s Immigration Doom Loop - Integral Views youtube.com/watch?v=tlZCVuiv…

My friend just created a website that tracks every single immigration NGO in the west with their funding $ numbers, phone number, names and addresses asylum.ngo

Same is happening in Cornwall. In fact, a builder told me yesterday, its now such a problem in Cornwall, that they cant actually sell properties off plan to pay for the new builds because nobody wants to buy a new build where hundreds of migrants are being housed. A lot of building has been halted because they're not being sold.

just found out somalia has not printed ANY banknotes since the collapse of the government in 1991 lmfao

i can’t believe i found this!😭🤯#british #brit #meme #lol

Giant octopus grabs the diver and pulls him straight into the water... Never turn your back on the ocean 😱🐙

Our statement on the UK government’s demand that all content on all devices sold or used in the country be scanned, on the presumption of nudity, using a dystopian combination of age verification and content scanning. This proposal will not safeguard children. It endangers us all. signal.org/blog/pdfs/2026-06…

wow YouTube is at 20 year old video recommendations now

“I’ve raised horses for 30 years in Ohio — I’ve never seen ticks like this.” “Whatever Bill Gates is funding with these tick projects, something isn’t right.” Lyme cases are climbing. New tick species are spreading. Gates funds tick biotech research.

Anyone else having AI slop in their dreams now?

Ed Miliband’s obsessed with cutting carbon dioxide by 87%. But CO2 is the gas of life and feeds earth’s plants. It also warms the climate a bit - another plus. Instead of junking CO2 we should junk Ed Miliband

All the new automated weather stations are being fitted with solar panels to provide the energy for real time weather data transmission . The problem is that the solar panels themselves can reach a temperature of 65.6 Celsius when the sun is shining. Many of the latest heat wave records being recorded in Europe are bogus.

A staggering 7 to 8 billion solar panels have been deployed globally—but up to 90% of them are currently on a direct trajectory toward disposal. While modern solar panels are technically made of roughly 95% recyclable materials (glass, aluminum, copper, and silicon), recycling currently runs at a steep economic loss. * The cost: Processing runs $500–$1,000 per tonne ($10 to $40 per panel). * The yield: The value of recovered materials doesn't even cover the transport fees. Compared with minimal landfill fees, economics dictate that burial is the default option. But the world is rapidly running out of room, and governments are beginning to panic. We are already seeing a preview of this crisis in the wind sector, where an expected 43 million tonnes of turbine blade waste by 2050 has led several European nations—including Austria, Germany, Finland, and the Netherlands—to actively ban decommissioned blades from landfills. Solar is hitting the same wall. Panels built over two decades ago are reaching the end of their 20-to-24-year lifespans, while many more become economically obsolete and are replaced long before that. This has created a massive regulatory catch-22: To prevent heavy metals like lead and cadmium from potentially leaching into groundwater, jurisdictions like Victoria, Australia, have implemented strict bans on putting solar panels into landfills, classifying them as hazardous e-waste. Yet, with recycling remaining economically non-viable, we are creating an impossible bottleneck. While industry bodies like the IEA maintain that leaching risks from broken panels are negligible and within safety limits, the sheer volume of impending waste tells a different story. If it costs too much to recycle, and it is illegal to landfill, where do several billions of panels go? The 'clean energy' solution is rapidly staring down the barrel of a multi-generational hazardous waste problem. Image: Last year, the world built more new solar capacity than every other power source combined - Shutterstock.