I am head of Economics and Politics at Bloomberg and host of the Trumponomics podcast . Also a QPR fan. But views are my own, and retweets are not endorsements.

Joined March 2011
32 Photos and videos
I and many many others have been a repeated subject of scam ads. It takes a surprisingly long time to get social media firms to take them down even when they are identical to previous proven fakes. Not great.
Dear @Keir_Starmer, you said to big tech: 'If you profit from harm & abuse, you lose the right to self-regulate' - yet you've done almost nothing to tackle scam ads? An Open Letter to the PM from @MoneySavingExp & @WhichUK highlighting Govt's repeated, ongoing, flaccid treatment of scam ads
3
21
75
49,415
Stephanie Flanders retweeted
I am looking to hire a chief economic advisor. As Reform prepare for government we are looking to expand our growing team of policy advisors. I’m after an exceptionally talented individual with a strong grounding in macro economics. If you’re passionate about getting growth again in the economy, and have ideas to shake up our stale economic debate, this role is for you. We have a once in a generation opportunity to build a new economic model that transforms this country for the better. If you have the energy and determination to do that with us, this role is for you. The job will involve: -policy development -modelling -in-depth research No experience in Westminster is required. Business experience is preferable. The pay is highly competitive, but variable depending on the candidate. Please email your CV and a cover letter to jenrickr@parliament.uk Applications close on the 29th May but will be reviewed on a rolling basis.
1,328
589
2,792
807,590
Stephanie Flanders retweeted
BREAKING: An ally of Wes Streeting - who came out publicly to call for Starmer to go - says Streeting has “blown it.” They say he has lost support today from MPs who might have backed him and that they now don’t think he has the numbers to get on the ballot.
***NEW: State of play this evening*** Keir Starmer has defied all expectations, surviving the day despite some 90 Labour MPs calling for his head and four junior ministerial resignations. A minister tells Bloomberg they are astonished Starmer has managed to get through it without being forced to announce a timetable for his departure, saying the day went better for him than anyone can have imagined. Starmer’s stance at cabinet effectively dared his rivals to come out and publicly challenge him. As of this evening, no one has. Streeting is speaking with Starmer tomorrow morning, as per @steven_swinford, after the PM blanked him post-cabinet. The health secretary’s allies say he won’t say anything to distract from the king’s speech. Labour MPs and aides think Streeting is conducting what one calls a campaign of attrition against Starmer by drip-feeding his supporters’ calls for the PM to go. His camp deny he is orchestrating a plot. Streeting’s supporters say they are divided about his strategy. Some are disappointed he has not yet gone over the top, fearing he could be seen as losing his nerve and being labelled a bottle job. However, others caution that pressure has to grow organically on Starmer before Streeting is able to challenge him, otherwise the soft-left will accuse him of a cynical move to force a contest before Andy Burnham is ready. One Streeting supporter says they fear his chances of becoming PM are decreasing. They say they’re struggling to see how he has a path to No10 because if he runs the soft-left will put someone up against him who is likely to be favoured by members. They say they’re coming to terms with what they see as the likelihood that Burnham will succeed Starmer. However so far Burnham is also still silent. He’s in London meeting MPs and discussing his options. His camp insist he has a plan to make it to parliament, but so far they’ve stopped short of announcing it. Labour is in a state of paralysis tonight. David Lammy says no one has come forward and no one seems to have the numbers against Starmer. Most in Labour don’t expect that to hold. They still think the PM will be forced to announce a timetable in the coming days if Streeting, Burnham and the cabinet move. But as of right now, he clings on. Story with great colleagues @EllenAMilligan @Joe_Mayes >>> bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
87
234
1,449
465,336
Stephanie Flanders retweeted
Argentina's free market experiment spearheaded by @JMilei has once again defied the doomsayers. The declining poverty rate shows how capitalism, not socialism, creates prosperity. Our latest, @PostOpinions: washingtonpost.com/opinions/…
94
348
1,586
153,280
Stephanie Flanders retweeted
Labour's growth plan is more investment. Most (80pc) is UK private sector. By driving up employment costs, it is pushing firms to invest. The numbers are improving. But the price is higher unemployment. UK is looking US these days, and more French bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
4
7
36
12,746
Excellent, thoughtful column.
Tommy Robinson is holding a carol service today billed as a statement that "Britain belongs to the British people." The cross is being co-opted into culture wars. But the King and the Pope have a very different vision of what faith means. My column:- times-comment.com/king
3
1
21
35,413
Given the dilemma whether to tack left or right to reclaim supporters, the government seems to be choosing “both”. But hasn’t Reform been doing the same?
I’ve been working in politics a long time. I’ve seen some bonkers stuff. But having the Prime Minister blast an opponent’s policy as racist on Sunday, then getting the Home Secretary to announce the same policy on Monday is about the maddest thing I’ve seen at a party conference.
14
7,250
He has such good political instincts, it’s interesting to me that Farage doesn’t fear blowback from testifying against the UK in another country - and even offering tacit support for US countermeasures. Even 5 years ago it would have been v unpopular.
PM pours scorn on Farage, who’s missing PMQs as in Washington talking about free speech. Starmer says he has gone “to bad mouth and talk down our country” and champion sanctions on UK. Response to a likely planted question on the Online Safety Act
6
1
21
8,703
Stephanie Flanders retweeted
After six years of reporting in Hong Kong, and at eight months pregnant, I’m very sad to be leaving my colleagues, friends and the place I’ve called home.  fcchk.org/visa-denial-for-re… I’ll be out of office for a while on maternity leave. Wherever I land, catch you on the other side
41
94
331
49,112
Stephanie Flanders retweeted
24 Jul 2025
In which I join the @business Trumponomics podcast to discuss tariffs, inflation, and the Fed. Really enjoyed talking with @AnnaEconomist, one of the few honest brokers out there willing to say when the economics profession is just getting it wrong. bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
10
7
22
34,924
Is Trump right that the Fed is getting it wrong? The fear is that tariffs will stoke inflation, but that is not supposed to happen when inflation expectations are ‘well anchored’, as the Fed insists. So what gives? @oren_cass and @AnnaEconomist get into it shorturl.at/Hjtma
2
7
2,664
A double dose of podcast magic this week as I reunite with @peston to talk US tax cuts, the mad pace of politics and economics coverage today, Labour’s new tilt on immigration and much else. open.spotify.com/episode/4E4…

6
1
6
3,410
AND f you can’t get enough of this talk there’s Trumponomics - in which economist and Donald Trump fan Stephen Moore explains why he’s bullish about the US even though he’s not happy at all with higher tariffs. bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
2,946
Could China win this trade war with the US? Losing its biggest export market is a big deal, but as @nouriel explains, Xi Jinping has a higher pain threshold than Donald Trump - and more room to cushion the blow on the domestic economy shorturl.at/3TFhN
5
3
15
8,348
@nouriel: “The strike price for a Trump put is much higher than for the Powell put and also higher than for the Xi Jinping put. In other words: Trump is gonna blink before the Fed does and before Xi Jinping. “
2
2
12
3,192
Stephanie Flanders retweeted
Enjoyed discussing the new tariffs on @KQEDnews @KQEDForum show/podcast this morning with @WallachLori and @MyStephanomics, and Alexis Madrigal. You can listen at the link or wherever you stream podcasts. kqed.org/forum/2010101909473…
1
5
3,290
One of the more interesting historical parallels I’ve seen for the past week…Trump Isn’t the First President to Blow Up the Trading System thefp.com/p/to-understand-tr…
5
4
9
3,018
Not all economists agree on this topic, to be sure…(and yes there will exporters in 10% countries like the UK who may now see a greater capacity to compete against China in global markets).
2 Apr 2025
The new policies announced by President Trump today confirm the end of the disastrous WTO era and lay the groundwork for a new set of arrangements in the international economy that prioritize the national interest and the flourishing of the nation's working families.
3
1
3
5,466
Stephanie Flanders retweeted
Running bilateral trade surplus/deficits with different countries is the way it should be. Trying to eliminate each one is simply stupid. I have a trade deficit with my grocer, a trade surplus with my employer. I am not sure it would be a great idea for me to work for my grocer. (Even if the loss for the economic profession was minimal, I am not very good at packing groceries.) Same thing with countries. There are reasons why we sell more to one, buy more from another. Different tariff rates across countries imply reshuffling of deficits and surpluses across countries, but no obvious change in the overall trade deficit. To go back to the economist’s mantra (and the power of identities): If you want to reduce the overall trade deficit, increase saving (you might consider decreasing the budget deficit?) or decrease investment.
92
598
2,369
218,361